Una propuesta de diseño, evaluación y rediseño de secuencias de enseñanza-aprendizaje en Física introductoria

  1. Jenaro Guisasola
  2. Kristina Zuza
  3. Jaume Ametller
  4. José Gutierrez-Berraondo
Revista:
UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

ISSN: 1135-1438,  2385-4731

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 2019

Páginas: 109-122

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.17345/UTE.2019.2.2660 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

In this article we present a proposal for the design and evaluation of Sequences of Teaching-Learning (SEA) for secondary and University. Relevant contributions are taken into account in the design of teaching sequences based on the Design-Based Research methodology and we will discuss how the SEAs, designed according to our proposal, relate to the progression of students in learning. An iterative methodology is presented that allows the evaluation and redesign of SEAs. The proposed evaluation strategy focuses on three aspects: a) evaluation of the activities of the SEA; b) evaluation of the learning achieved by the students in relation to the objectives set forth and c) a document that allows compiling the difficulties identified when implementing the SEA that serves as a guide for the teachers. The discussion of this guide with external teachers provides comments that serve to redesign the SEA. The context of our implementation and evaluation is an innovative physics course for first year engineering students at the University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU).

Referencias bibliográficas

  • D. Psillos, D. and Kariotoglou, P. (Eds.), Iterative design of teaching-learning sequences: Introducing the science of materials in European schools (Springer, Drodrecht, The Netherland, 2016)
  • K. Kortland and K. Klaassen (Eds), (2010). Designing theory-based teaching-learning sequences for science education (CDBeta Press, Utrechet, 2010)
  • Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
  • K. Ruthven, C. Laborde, J. Leach and A. Tiberghien, Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences, Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329-342 (2009)
  • R. Duit, H. Gropengießer, K. Kattmann, M. Komorek and I. Parchmann, (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction - A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science, in Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective edited by D. Jorde and J. Dillon (Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherland) pp. 13-38
  • Leach, J., Scott, P., Ametller, J., Hind, A., & Lewis, J. Improving Subject Teaching: Lessons from Research in Science Education. Routledge, 2006).
  • Savinainen, A., Mäkynen, A., & Nieminen, P. (2017). The Effect of Using a Visual Representation Tool in a Teaching-Learning Sequence for Teaching Newton ' s Third Law. Research in Science Education, 119-135..
  • M. Méheut, M. and D. Psillos, Teaching-learning sequences: aims and tools for science education research, International Journal of Science Education, 26:5, 515-535 (2004)
  • Y. Chevallard, La transposition didactique (Didactical transposition) (La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble, France, 2nd ed. 1991)
  • C. Buty, A. Tiberghien and J. Le Maréchal, Learning hypotheses and an associated tool to design and to analyse teaching-learning sequences, International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 579-604 (2004)
  • A. Tiberghien, J. Vince and P. Gaidioz, Design-based Research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2275-2314 (2009)
  • K. Juuti and J. Lavonen, Design-Based Research in Science Education : One Step Towards Methodology. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4, 54-68 (2006)
  • J. Leach, J. Ametller and P. Scott, Establishing and communicating knowledge about teaching and learning scientific content: The role of design briefs, in Designing Theory-Based Teahing-Learning Sequences for Science Education edited by K. Kortland & K. Klaassen (CDBeta Press, Utrechet, 2010) pp. 7-36
  • Easterday, M., Rees Lewis, D., & Gerber, E. (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications, in Proceedings of International Conference of Learning Sciences edited by J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee, and L. D'Amico ( International Society of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO) pp. 317-324`
  • Trna, J., & Trnova, E. (2014). Design-based research as an innovation approach in the construction and evaluation of IBSME. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Mathematics and Science Education Research Conference 1-3 May 2014, Famagusta, North Cyprus, (May), 187-191
  • C. Hirn and L. Viennot, Transformation of didactic intentions by teachers: The case of geometrical optics in grade 8 in France, International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357 - 384 (2000)
  • B. Andersson and F. Bach, On designing and evaluating teaching sequences taking geometrical optics as an example, Science Education, 89(2), 196-218 (2005)
  • P.L. Lijnse, "Developmental research" as a way to an empirically based "didactical structure" of science, Science Education, 79(2), 189-199 (1995); P.L. Lijnse, Didactical structures as an outcome of research on teaching-learning sequences?, International Journal of Science Education, 26:5, 537-554 (2004)
  • D. Psillos, An epistemological analysis of the evolution of didactical activities in teaching-learning sequences: the case of fluids. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 555-578 (2004)
  • L. McDermott, P.S. Shaffer and Washington Physics Education. Tutorials in Introductory Physics (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) (2002).
  • B.M. Sebastià and J.M. Torregrosa, Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the Sun-Earth model: A proposal of a teaching-learning sequence. Astronomy Education Review, 4(1), 121-126 (2005)
  • J. Ametller, J. Leach and P. Scott, Using perspectives on subject learning to inform the design of subject teaching: an example from science education, Curriculum Journal, 18(4), 479-492 (2007)
  • The Design-Based Research Collective. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry, Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5-8 (2003)
  • P. Bell, On the theoretical breadth of design-based research in education, Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243-253 (2004)
  • J. Gutierrez-Berraondo, K. Zuza, G. Zavala and J. Guisasola, University students' ideas about the relation between work and enegy in Mechanic at introductory physics courses, Revista Brasileira de Fisica 40,1 (2018).
  • J. Leach and P. Scott, Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning, Studies in Science Education, 38:1, 115-142 (2002)
  • N. Nieveen, Formative evaluation in educational design research edited by T. Plomp and N. Nieveen An introduction to educational design research (Enschede: SLO, 2009) pp. 89-101
  • A. H. Schoenfeld, How can we examine the connections between teachers' world views and their educational practices?, Issues in education. Contributions from Educational psychology, 8 (2), 229-232 (2002)
  • B. A. Sherwood, Pseudowork and real work, American Journal Physics 51, 597-602 (1983)
  • B.A. Lindsey, P. R. L. Heron and P. S. Shaffer, Student ability to apply the concepts of work and energy to extended systems. American Journal of Physics 77 (11), 999-1009 (2009).
  • ] J.W. Jewett. Energy and the Confused Student I: Work, The Physics Teacher 46, 38 (2008)
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet