A formal Anthropocene is compatible with but distinct from its diachronous anthropogenic counterparts: a response to W.F. Ruddiman’s ‘three flaws in defining a formal Anthropocene’

  1. Zalasiewicz, J.
  2. Waters, C.N.
  3. Head, M.J.
  4. Poirier, C.
  5. Summerhayes, C.P.
  6. Leinfelder, R.
  7. Grinevald, J.
  8. Steffen, W.
  9. Syvitski, J.
  10. Haff, P.
  11. McNeill, J.R.
  12. Wagreich, M.
  13. Fairchild, I.J.
  14. Richter, D.D.
  15. Vidas, D.
  16. Williams, M.
  17. Barnosky, A.D.
  18. Cearreta, A.
Journal:
Progress in Physical Geography

ISSN: 0309-1333

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 43

Issue: 3

Pages: 319-333

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1177/0309133319832607 GOOGLE SCHOLAR