El papel del CSIC en el grado de apertura de la estrategia de innovación de las empresas españolas

  1. Valmaseda-Andia, Oihana
  2. Albizu-Gallastegi, Eneka
Revista:
Revista española de documentación científica

ISSN: 0210-0614,  1988-4621

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 40

Número: 1

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3989/REDC.2017.1.1365 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de documentación científica

Resumen

Las empresas, cada vez más, utilizan una estrategia de innovación abierta que les posibilita la realización y comercialización de sus innovaciones. En este trabajo se analiza cuál es el grado de apertura (amplitud y profundidad) de la estrategia de innovación seguida por 787 empresas españolas y el papel que juega el CSIC dentro de estas estrategias. Los resultados obtenidos sugieren la existencia de una clara asociación entre esta estrategia y el desempeño innovador de las empresas que conforman la muestra. Asimismo, se pone de manifiesto cuál es el diferencial del CSIC en relación con el resto de los actores que interactúan con las empresas en sus procesos de innovación. Más concretamente, este organismo se distingue significativamente por la aportación de conocimiento efectuada a las empresas a través del apoyo tecnológico o consultoría y las investigaciones bajo contrato. Finalmente, se establecen las implicaciones derivadas del estudio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arora, A.; Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 38 (4), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098345
  • Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, vol. 37 (7), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X511990
  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 13 (1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(95)00090-9
  • Bayona, C.; García-Marco, T.; Huerta-Arribas, E. (2003). ¿Cooperar en I+ D? Con quién y para qué. Revista de Economía Aplicada, vol. 31(11), 103-134.
  • Bianchi, M.; Cavaliere, A.; Chiaroni, D.; Frattini, F.; Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, vol. 31 (1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Chesbrough, H.; Crowther, A.K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, vol. 36 (3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  • Christensen, J.F.; Olesen, M.H.; Kjaer, J.S. (2005). The industrial dynamics of open innovation: evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Research Policy, vol. 34 (10), 1533-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002
  • Cohen, W. M.; Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99, 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  • Dahlander, L.; Gann, D.M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research Policy, vol. 39 (6), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
  • Enkel, E.; Gassmann, O. (2008). Driving open innovation in the front end The IBM case. Working Paper University of St. Gallen and Zeppelin University; St. Gallen y Friedrichshafen.
  • Enkel, E.; Gassmann, O.; Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, vol. 39 (4), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x
  • Fasnacht, D. (2009). Open Innovation in the financial services: growing through openness, flexibility and customer integration. Springer Science & Business Media. Heidelberg.
  • Fetterhoff, T.J.; Voelkel, D. (2006). Managing open innovation in biotechnology. Research Technology Management, vol. 49 (3), 14–18.
  • Fey, C.F.; Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, vol. 31 (4), 597-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272346
  • García-Carpintero, E.; Albert-Martínez, A.; Granadino, B.; Plaza, L.M. (2014). Análisis de la colaboración entre las empresas biotecnológicas españolas con actividades de I+D y el sistema público de I+D. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 37 (2), e041. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.2.1106
  • Gassmann, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, vol. 36 (3), 223- 228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
  • Giannopoulou, E.; Yström, A.; Ollila, S.; Fredberg, T.; Elmquist, M. (2010). Implications of Openness: A Study into (All) the Growing Literature on Open Innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, vol. 5 (3), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242010000300012
  • Helfat, C.E.; Quinn, B. (2006). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 20 (2), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2006.20591014
  • Henkel, J. (2006). Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux. Research Policy, vol. 35 (7), 953-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.010
  • Huang, F.; Rice, J. (2012). Openness in product and process innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 16 (4), 1250020-1-1250020-24. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919612003812
  • Huizingh, E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, vol. 31 (1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
  • Ili, S.; Albers, A.; Miller, S. (2010). Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&D Management, vol. 40 (3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00595.x
  • Keupp, M.M.; Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, vol. 39 (4), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x
  • Laursen, K.; Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?. Research Policy, vol. 33 (8), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  • Laursen, K.; Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27 (2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  • Laursen, K.; Salter, A.J. (2014). The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, vol. 43 (5), 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
  • Lee, S.; Park, G.; Yoon, B.; Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs - An intermediated network model. Research Policy, vol. 39 (2), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
  • Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: Past research, current debates, and future directions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 25 (1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2011.59198451
  • Love, J. H.; Roper, S.; Vahter, P. (2014). Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 35 (11), 1703-1716. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2170
  • Miotti, L.; Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, vol. 32 (8), 1481-1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
  • Olmos-Pe-uela, J.; Castro-Martínez, E. (2014). ¿Cómo interaccionan los investigadores de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del CSIC con otros agentes sociales fuera de los cauces institucionales?. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 37 (4), e072. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1165
  • Pearson, K. (1911). On the probability that two independent distributions of frequency are really samples from the same population. Biometrika, vol. 8 (1/2), 250-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331453
  • Poot, T.; Faems, D.; Vanhaverbeke, W. (2009). Toward a dynamic perspective on open innovation: a longitudinal assessment of the adoption of internal and external innovation strategies in the Netherlands". International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 13 (2), 177– 200. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960900225X
  • Reichstein, T.; Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 15(4), 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl014
  • Santamaria, L.; Rialp, J. (2007). La elección del socio en las cooperaciones tecnológicas: Un análisis empírico. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 31, 65-94.
  • Santamaria, L.; Surroca, J. (2011). Matching the goals and impacts of R&D collaboration. European Management Review, vol. 8 (2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01012.x
  • Sarkar, S.; Costa, A.I. (2008). Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 19 (11), 574-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.006
  • Sherwood, A.L.; Covin, J.G. (2008). Knowledge Acquisition in University–Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 25 (2), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x
  • Tether, B.S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, vol. 31 (6), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
  • Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44(5), 996– 1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443
  • Valmaseda-Andia, O.; Albizu-Gallastegui, E.; Fernández- Esquinas, M.; Fernández de Lucio, I. (2015). La relación entre las empresas españolas y el CSIC: Motivaciones, mecanismos y beneficios desde la perspectiva empresarial, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 38 (4), e109. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2015.4.1263
  • Van De Vrande, V.; De Jong, J.P.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; De Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, vol. 29 (6-7), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  • Van de Vrande, V.; Vanhaverbeke, W.; Gassmann, O. (2010). Broadening the scope of open innovation: past research, current state and future directions. International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 52 (3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035974
  • West, J.; Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, vol. 36 (3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x
  • Whitley, R. (2002). Developing innovative competences: the role of institutional frameworks. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11 (3), 497-528. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.497
  • Zahra, S.A.; Nielsen, A.P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet