Zer da lehenago, aditzoina ala partizipioa? Oharrak euskararen kronologiarako

  1. Blanca Urgell 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo: International journal of basque linguistics and philology

ISSN: 0582-6152

Argitalpen urtea: 2018

Alea: 52

Zenbakia: 1-2

Orrialdeak: 777-816

Mota: Artikulua

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo: International journal of basque linguistics and philology

Laburpena

In this work I hope to look more deeply at the relationship between the root and the participle of Basque verbs. We will see with the help of a range of evidence that the opposition between them has more nuances diachronically speaking than it seems to have from the synchronic point of view and that basically what we see in historical Basque cannot simply be assumed to be the case in Proto Basque. Therefore, I will attempt to prove a stronger hypothesis i.e. that the historical verb root is a consequence of the morphologization of the irregularities which brought about the phonetic changes that altered the point of merger of compounds and derivatives prior to the first medieval documents. Apart from attempting to shed some light on some other hitherto unexplained phenomena such as the type of *emanite verbal nouns proposed by Trask (1990), this hypothesis also gives us the opportunity to increase our understanding of the birth, nature and chronology of other phenomena related to the make up of the historical verbal system such as the periphrastic perfect and the pleonastic participles in -itu.