El efecto de los valores profesionales y la cultura organizativa en la respuesta de los auditores a las presiones de tiempo

  1. Marcela Espinosa-Pike 1
  2. Itsaso Barrainkua 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Economía Financiera I, Universidad del País Vasco
Revista:
Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

ISSN: 0210-2412

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 46

Número: 4

Páginas: 507-534

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1080/02102412.2017.1298304 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Revista española de financiación y contabilidad

Resumen

Este trabajo estudia la respuesta de los auditores a las presiones derivadas de los presupuestos de auditoría ajustados, así como el efecto que los valores profesionales de los auditores y otros factores organizativos tienen en su comportamiento. El estudio, llevado a cabo entre 103 auditores españoles, revela que las presiones de tiempo y competencia influyen en la falta de dedicación de tiempo suficiente a los procedimientos de auditoría y en la decisión de no revelar la totalidad de las horas dedicadas al encargo, comportamientos ambos considerados disfuncionales. Los resultados muestran además que la aceptabilidad ética de estas prácticas, la orientación hacia el cliente y la cultura ética organizativa influyen en dichos comportamientos disfuncionales. De este trabajo se derivan implicaciones para las firmas de auditoría, los organismos reguladores y la profesión en su conjunto. En concreto, los resultados apoyan las medidas adoptadas a nivel internacional que promueven la asignación de recursos suficientes, la formación ética y la implantación de criterios de evaluación que reconocen el compromiso con los principios éticos.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Agoglia, C. P., Hatfield, R. C., & Lambert, T. A., (2015). Audit team time reporting: An agency theory perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 44, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.03.005
  • Alderman, C. W., & Deitrick, J. W., (1982). Auditors’ perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: A replication and extension. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 1, 54–68.
  • Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K., (2000). In the name of the client: The service ethic in two professional services firms. Human Relations, 53(9), 1151–1174. doi:10.1177/0018726700539003
  • Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K., (2001). Tests of time: Organizational time-reckoning and the making of accountants in two multi-national accounting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(2), 99–122. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00019-2
  • Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K., (2005). Helping them to forget.’: The organizational embedding of gender relations in public audit firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 469–490. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.003
  • Barrainkua, I., & Espinosa-Pike, M., (2015). New insights into underreporting of time: The audit partner context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(4), 494–514. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-02-2014-1618
  • Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L., (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 1–20. doi:10.2307/2491243
  • Bonner, S. E., & Pennington, N., (1991). Cognitive processes and knowledge as determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Literature, 10, 1–50.
  • Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J., (2010). Traditional accountants and business professionals: Portraying the accounting profession after Enron. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 360–376. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.002
  • Carrera, N., Gutiérrez, I., & Carmona, S., (2001). Gender, the state and the audit profession: Evidence from Spain (1942–88). European Accounting Review, 10(4), 803–815. doi:10.1080/09638180120088277
  • Castrillo, L., Calderón, E., García, M., Ortiz, J., & Pérez, M. J., (1995). Análisis multivariante del comportamiento ético de los auditores españoles. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting /Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad, 24(84), 667–696.
  • Cianci, A. M., & Bierstaker, J., (2009). Auditors’ efficiency motivated evaluation. Advances in Accounting, 25(1), 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2009.03.002
  • Cook, E., & Kelley, T., (1988). Auditor stress and time budgets. The CPA Journal, 58(7), 83–86.
  • Cooper, D. J., & Robson, K., (2006). Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 415–444. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.003
  • Davenport, L., & Dellaportas, S., (2009). Interpreting the public interest: A survey of professional accountants. Australian Accounting Review, 19(1), 11–23. doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2008.00041.x
  • DeZoort, F. T., & Lord, A. T., (1997). A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 28–85.
  • Donnelly, D. P., Quirin, J. J., & O’Bryan, D., (2003). Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: An explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 87–110. doi:10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.87
  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N., (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121. doi:10.1023/A:1012261900281
  • Ernstberger, J., Koch, C., & Tan, H. T., (2015). What dimensions of lead auditor expertise matter for audit quality and audit fees? In Working paper. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2574639. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2574639
  • Espinosa-Pike, M., & Barrainkua, I., (2016). An exploratory study of the pressures and ethical dilemmas in the audit conflict. Revista De Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 19(1). doi:10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.10.001
  • Ettredge, M., Fuerherm, E. E., & Li, C., (2014). Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 247–263. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.04.002
  • Gable, M., & Dangello, F., (1994). Locus of control, Machiavellianism, and managerial job performance. The Journal of Psychology, 128(5), 599–608. doi:10.1080/00223980.1994.9914917
  • Guiral, A., Rodgers, W., Ruiz, E., & Gonzalo-Angulo, J. A., (2015). Can expertise mitigate auditors’ unintentional biases? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 105–117. doi:10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.11.002
  • Hanlon, G., (1996). Casino capitalism and the rise of the commercialised service class–An examination of the accountant. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 7, 339–363. doi:10.1006/cpac.1996.0038
  • Harteis, C., & Billett, S., (2013). Intuitive expertise: Theories and empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 9, 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.001
  • Herrbach, O., (2001). Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract. European Accounting Review, 10(4), 787–802. doi:10.1080/09638180127400
  • Herrbach, O., (2005). The art of compromise? The individual and organisational legitimacy of “irregular auditing”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 390–409. doi:10.1108/09513570510600756
  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2014). A framework for audit quality. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved 20January 2014. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/framework-audit-quality-key-elements-create-environment-audit-quality.
  • Kelley, T., & Margheim, L., (1990). The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(2), 21–42.
  • Knechel, W. R., (2015). Audit research in the wake of SOX. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(8/9), 706–726. doi:10.1108/MAJ-08-2015-1233
  • Lee, B., (2002). Professional socialisation, commercial pressures and junior staff’s time-pressured irregular auditing—A contextual interpretation. The British Accounting Review, 34(4), 315–333. doi:10.1006/bare.2002.0214
  • Lightner, S., Leisenring, J., & Winters, A., (1983). Underreporting chargeable time. Journal of Accountancy, 155(1), 52–57.
  • Liyanarachchi, G. A., & McNamara, S. M., (2007). Time budget pressure in New Zealand audits. University of Auckland Business Review, 9(2), 60–68.
  • Martinov-Bennie, N., & Pflugrath, G., (2009). The strength of an accounting firm’s ethical environment and the quality of auditors’ judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 237–253. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9882-1
  • McNair, C. J., (1991). Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 635–653. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(91)90017-9
  • McPhail, K., (2006). Ethics and the individual professional accountant. A literature review. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
  • Meneces Montenegro, T., & Antunes Bras, F., (2015). Audit quality: Does gender composition of audit firms matter? Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting /Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad, 44(3), 264–297. doi:10.1080/02102412.2015.1035578
  • Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J., (1996a). Auditor time budget pressure: Consequences and antecedents. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 31–58. doi:10.1108/09513579610109969
  • Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J., (1996b). The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practise & Theory, 15(2), 65–84.
  • Paino, H., Ismail, Z., & Smith, M., (2010). Dysfunctional audit behaviour: An exploratory study in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 18(2), 162–173. doi:10.1108/13217341011059417
  • Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B., (2003). Auditor responses to cost controls. Irish Accounting Review, 10(1), 45–68.
  • Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B., (2004). Cost–quality conflict in audit firms: An empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 415–441. doi:10.1080/0963818042000216794
  • Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B., (2010). The relationship between demographic variables and ethical decision making of trainee accountants. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 79–99. doi:10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00404.x
  • Ponemon, L. A., (1992). Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(1), 171–189. doi:10.1111/care.1992.9.issue-1
  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2010). Report on observations of PCAOB inspectors related to audit risk areas affected by the economic crisis (Release No. 2010-006).Washington, DC: Public Company Oversight Board.
  • Raghunathan, B., (1991). Premature signing-off of audit procedures: An analysis. Accounting Horizons, 5(2), 71–79.
  • Rest, J., (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Preager Publishers.
  • Rhode, J. G., (1978). The independent auditors’ work environment: A survey. Commission on auditor’s responsibilities (Research Study No. 4). New York, NY: AICPA.
  • Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S., (2011). Effects of organizational ethical culture on the ethical decisions of tax practitioners in mainland China. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(5), 647–668. doi:10.1108/09513571111139139
  • Shapeero, M., Koh, H. C., & Killough, L. N., (2003). Underreporting and premature sign-off in public accounting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(6/7), 478–489. doi:10.1108/02686900310482623
  • Sierra Molina, G., & Orta Pérez, M., (2005). La experiencia y el comportamiento ético de los Auditores: Un Estudio Empírico. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española De Financiación Y Contabilidad, 34(126), 731–754. doi:10.1080/02102412.2005.10779561
  • Sierra Molina, G., & Santa María, P. M., (2002). Audit professional judgements: The auditor’s individual differences. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad, 5(10), 179–203.
  • Svanberg, J., & Öhman, P., (2013). Auditors’ time pressure: Does ethical culture support audit quality? Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(7), 572–591. doi:10.1108/MAJ-10-2012-0761
  • Svanberg, J., & Öhman, P., (2014). Auditors’ identification with their clients: Effects on audit quality. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2014.08.003
  • Svanström, T., (2016). Time pressure, training activities and dysfunctional auditor behaviour: evidence from small audit firms. International Journal of Auditing, 20(1), 42–51. doi:10.1111/ijau.12054
  • Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., & Pierce, B., (2010). The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 531–551. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0237-3
  • Sweeney, B., & Pierce, B., (2006). Good hours, bad hours and auditors’ defence mechanisms in audit firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 858–892. doi:10.1108/09513570610709908
  • Treviño, L. K., (1990). A cultural perspective on changing and developing organizational ethics. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 195–230.
  • Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L., (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476. doi:10.2307/3857431
  • Willett, C., & Page, M. A., (1996). A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. The British Accounting Review, 28(2), 101–120. doi:10.1006/bare.1996.0009
  • Windsor, C. A., & Ashkanasy, N. M., (1996). Auditor independence decision making: The role of organizational culture perceptions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 80–97.