Intervención en el bullying y cyberbullyingEvaluación del caso Martín

  1. Maite Garaigordobil 1
  2. Vanesa Martínez-Valderrey 1
  3. Juan M. Machimbarrena 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco, España
Journal:
Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

ISSN: 2340-8340

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 4

Issue: 1

Pages: 25-32

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes

Abstract

Intervention in bullying and cyberbullying: Assessment of Martin’s case. The study had the following goals: (1) To assess the level of bullying/ cyberbullying in a 14-year-old adolescent aggressor; (2) To implement a program to prevent/reduce bullying/cyberbullying “Cyberprogram 2.0”; and (3) To assess the effects of the program in the reduction of this adolescent’s violent behavior and in other social and emotional variables. The research design was a quasi-experimental single-case study. At the beginning of the school year, a pretest assessment was performed, applying the Cyberbullying test, a screening of peer harassment (Garaigordobil, 2013) along with other instruments to measure different socio-emotional variables (social behavior, conflict-resolution strategies, self-esteem, empathy). Subsequently, we administered the Cyberprogram 2.0 (Garaigordobil & Martínez-Valderrey, 2014a) a group program that consists of one weekly one-hour intervention session for an entire school year. Finally, the posttest assessment was conducted by administering the same assessment battery as at pretest. The results showed that, at pretest, Martin had high scores in perpetration of bullying and cyberbullying, high levels of impulsive/premeditated aggression, high use of aggressive conflict-resolution strategies, an average level of self-esteem, and very low empathy. After participating in the Cyberprogram 2.0, Martin significantly decreased his level of perpetration of bullying/cyberbullying, and aggression, he used fewer aggressive strategies to solve interpersonal problems, and showed an average level of empathy. The study shows the effectiveness of a group intervention program to reduce perpetrators’ peer violence.

Bibliographic References

  • Aftab, P. (2006). Ciberbullying. Guía práctica para madres, padres y personal docente. Bilbao: Fundación EDEX http://www.edex.es
  • Álvarez-García, D., Dobarro, A., & Núñez, J.C. (2015). Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de cibervictimización en estudiantes de Secundaria. Aula Abierta, 43, 32-38. doi:10.1016/j.aula.2014.11.001
  • Álvarez-García, D., Núñez, J.C., Rodríguez, C., Álvarez, L., & Dobarro, A. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Violencia Escolar Revisado (CUVE-R). Journal of Psychodidactics, 16(1), 59-83. doi:10.1387/RevPsicodidact.1146
  • Andreu, J.M. (2010): CAPI-A: Cuestionario de Agresividad Premeditada e Impulsiva en Adolescentes. Madrid: TEA.
  • Bryant, B. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53, 413-425. doi: 10.2307/1128984
  • Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128-1135. doi:10.1016%2Fj.chb.2010.03.017
  • Cerezo, F., Calvo, A.R., & Sánchez, C. (2011). El programa CIP: Concienciar, Informar y Prevenir, para la intervención específica en bullying. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Chaux, E., Velásquez, A.M., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2016). Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program Media Heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 157–165. doi: 10.1002/ ab.21637
  • Ferguson, C.J., San Miguel, C., Kilburn, J.C., & Sánchez, P. (2007). The effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice Review, 32, 401-414. doi: 10.1177/0734016807311712
  • Gámez-Guadix, M., Villa-George, F., & Calvete, E. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Cyberbullying questionnaire (CBQ) among Mexican adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29(2), 232–247. doi:10.1891/0886-6708. VVD-12-00163R1
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2011). Prevalencia y consecuencias del cyberbullying: una revisión. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 233-254.
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2013). Cyberbullying: Screening de acoso entre Iguales. Madrid: TEA.
  • Garaigordobil, M. (2015). Cyberbullying in adolescents and youth in the Basque Country: Prevalence of cybervictims, cyberaggressors, and cyberobservers. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 569-582. doi:10.1080/13676261.2014.9923 24.
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2014a). Cyberprogram 2.0. Un programa de intervención para prevenir y reducir el ciberbullying. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2014b). Effect of Cyberprogram 2.0 on reducing victimization and improving social competence in adolescence. Journal of Psychodidactics, 19, 289-305. doi:10.1387/RevPsicodidact.10239
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2015a). Cyberprogram 2.0: Effects of the intervention on “face-to-face” bullying, cyberbullying, and empathy. Psicothema, 27, 45-51. doi:10.7334/psicothema2014.78
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2015b). The effectiveness of Cyberprogram 2.0 on conflict resolution strategies and self-esteem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(2), 229-234. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.04.007
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Martínez-Valderrey, V. (2016). Cyberprogram 2.0: Impact of the program on different types of school violence and premeditated/ impulsive aggressiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 428. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2016.00428
  • Garaigordobil, M. Martínez-Valderrey, V., Páez, D., & Cardozo, G. (2015). Bullying y Ciberbullying: Diferencias entre colegios públicos-privados y religiosos-laicos. Pensamiento Psicológico, 13(1), 39-52. doi:10.11144/ Javerianacali.PPSI13-1.bcdc
  • Garaigordobil, M., & Oñederra, J.A. (2010). La Violencia entre iguales: Revisión teórica y estrategias de intervención. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Kymsey, W.D., & Fuller, R.M (2003). Conflictalk: An instrument for measuring youth adolescent conflict management message styles. Conflict Resolution Quartely, 21(1), 69-78. doi: 10.1002/crq.49
  • Mestre, M.V., Tur, A., Samper, P., & Malonda, E., (2012). Programa de educación de las emociones: la con-vivencia. Tirant lo Blanch: Valencia
  • Monjas, M.I., & Avilés, J.M. (2006). Programa de sensibilización contra el maltrato entre iguales. Valladolid: Consejería de Educación. Junta de Castilla y León.
  • Moraleda, M., González, J., & García-Gallo, J. (1998/2004). AECS. Actitudes y estrategias cognitivas sociales. Madrid: TEA
  • Olweus, D. (2007). Olweus bullying Questionnaire. Center City, MN: Hazelden Foundation. Recuperado de http://www.violencepreventionworks.org/ public/olweus_program_materials.page
  • Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780. doi:10.1146/ annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516
  • Olweus, D., Limber, S.P., Flerx, V.C., Mullin, N., Riese, J., & Snyder, M. (2007). Olweus bullying prevention program: Schoolwide guide. Center City, MN: Hazelden Foundation.
  • Piñuel, I., & Oñate, A. (2006). AVE. Acoso y Violencia Escolar. Madrid: TEA.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image, 11(2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature an impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 7610.2007.01846.x
  • Stewart, R.W., Drescher, C.F., Maack, D.J., Ebesutani, Ch., & Young, J. (2014). The development and psychometric investigation of the Cyberbullying Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2218–2238. doi:10.1177/0886260513517552
  • Ttofi, M.M., & Farrington D.P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27-56. doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
Data source: Dialnet