La declaración unilateral de aceptación de la competencia de la Corte Penal Internacional (artículo 12.3 del ECPI). De la formulación estatutaria a su puesta en práctica (Costa de Marfil, Uganda, Palestina, Ucrania...)
ISSN: 1697-5197
Year of publication: 2016
Issue: 31
Type: Article
More publications in: Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI)
Abstract
The article 12.3 of the International Criminal Court’s Statute allows the States not party of the treaty to make a unilateral declaration accepting the competence of the Court, without expressing their consent to be bound to the Statute. This paper addresses the survey of the provision in the light of the practice arisen from its statutory formulation and the interesting matters that its implementation has brought up regarding aspects such as the entitlement to issue the declaration, the material, temporal, territorial and subjective scope thereof, the procedure after its submission before the Secretary of the ICC and the problems derived from the possibility that a State may withdraw the trust placed in the ICC in the form of a declaration. The declarations issued until now on behalf of Côte d’Ivoire, Uganda, Palestine, Ukraine and even Egypt, and the response given by the ICC to the different matters mentioned above, allow to have a glimpse of a provision full of possibilities, not only for the States that have not ratified the treaty yet, but also for the 124 States that already did.
Bibliographic References
- ABELLÓ JIMÉNEZ, A.E., “El ‘margen protector’ de la Corte Penal Internacional”, Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal, Vol. 3, 2015
- AKANDE, D., “ICC Prosecutor Decides that He Can’t Decide on the Statehood of Palestine. Is he Right?”, disponible en http://www.ejiltalk.org/icc-prosecutor-decides-that-he-cant-decideon-the-statehood-of-palestine-is-he-right/
- AKANDE, D., “Palestine as UN Observer State: Does this Make Palestine a State?”, disponible en http://www.ejiltalk.org/palestine-as-a-un-observer-state-does-this-make-palestine-a-state/.
- AKHAVAN, P., “The Lord’s Resistance Army Case: Uganda’s Submission of the first state referral to the International Criminal Court”, AJIL, 2005, Vol. 99-2, pp. 403-421
- AMBOS, K., “Palestine, UN Non Member Observer Status and ICC Jurisdiction”, disponible en http://www.ejiltalk.org/palestine-un-non-member-observer-status-and-icc-jurisdiction
- ANDRÉS SAÉZ DE SANTAMARÍA, M.P., Sistema de Derecho Internacional Público, Ed. Civitas-Thomson Reuters, 2014 (3ª Ed.), pp. 118-119
- BOLLO AROCENA, M.D., “La impunidad de los Estados frente a las violaciones de los Derechos Humanos y del Derecho Internacional Humanitario. Algunas reflexiones al hilo de los ataques israelíes contra la franja de Gaza (diciembre de 2008-enero de 2009), Cursos de Derechos Humanos de Donostia-San Sebastián, Vol. X, 2009, pp. 59-88.
- CHAN, J., “Judicial Oversight over Article 12(3) of the ICC Statute”, FICHL Policy Brief Series, Nº 11, 2013, p. 2, disponible en http://www.fichl.org/fileadmin/fichl/documents/FICHL_Policy_Brief_Series/FICHL_PB11.pdf.
- FREELAND, S., “How Open Should the Door Be? – Declarations by non-States Parites under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court”, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 211-241.
- GUTIERREZ ESPADA, C. y CERVELL HORTAL, M.J., El Derecho Internacional en la encrucijada. Curso general de Derecho Internacional Público, Ed. Trotta, Madrid, 2008, pp. 263-264
- HELLER, K.J., “Yes, Palestine Could Accept the ICC’s Jurisdiction Retroactively” en el blog Opinio Juris, 29 de noviembre de 2012, disponible en http://opiniojuris.org/2012/11/29/yes-palestine-couldaccept-the-iccs-jurisdiction-retroactively
- HELLER, K.J., “Wich Organ of the ICC Decides Whether Palestine Is a State?” en el blog Opinio Juris, disponible en http://opiniojuris.org/2012/04/04/which-organ-of-the-iccdecides-whether-palestine-is-a-state/.
- KEARNEY, M., “The situation in Palestine”, en el blog Opinio Juris, disponible en http://opiniojuris.org/2012/04/05/the-situation-in-palestine/
- KONTOROVICH, E., “Israel/Palestine – The ICC’s Uncharted Territory”, JICJ, 2013, Vol. 11 Nº 5, pp. 979-999
- LÓPEZ DE JACOISTE DÍAZ, M.E., “El reconocimiento de Palestina como "Estado observador no miembro" en las Naciones Unidas y sus efectos jurídico-políticos”, REDI, Vol. 65, Nº 1, 2013, págs. 270-276
- PELLET, A., “The effects of Palestine’s Recognition of the International Criminal Court’s Jurisdiction”, en C. Meloni y G. Tognoni (eds), Is There a Court for Gaza?, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2012, pp. 409-428, disponible igualmente con ese mismo título en http://www.icccpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/D3C77FA6-9DEE-45B1-ACC0-B41706BB41E5/281927/PelletENGCLEAN1.pdf
- PIERNAS LÓPEZ, J.J., “Estudio de la práctica de la Corte Penal Internacional en materia de investigaciones preliminares a la luz de la reciente remisión de la Unión de Comores”, Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 327-361 disponible en http://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/37335/1/201412%20AEDI%2029%20%282013%29%20- %208.pdf
- REMIRO BROTÓNS, A., RIQUELME CORTADO, R., ORIHUELA CALATAYUD, E., DÍEZ HOCHLEITNER, J., PÉREZ PRAT DURBÁN, L., Derecho Internacional. Curso General, Ed. Tirant lo Blanc, Valencia, 2010, p. 176.
- SHANY, Y., “In Defence of Functional Interpretation of Article 12(3): A Response to Yaël Ronen”, en C. Meloni y G. Tognoni (eds), Is There a Court for Gaza?, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, 2012, pp. 497-512, p. 503.
- SCHABAS, W., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 3ª Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, pp. 76-77)
- SCHABAS, W.A., The International Criminal Court. A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 277-292.
- SOROETA LICERAS, J., “Una visión del conflicto palestino: bloqueo histórico, colapso jurídico, fracaso político”, Cursos de Derecho Internacional y Relaciones Internacionales de Vitoria Gasteiz 2009, Servicio Editorial de la UPV/EHU, Bilbao, 2010, pp. 282-332.
- STAHN, C. “Why some Doors may be Colsed Already: Second Thoughts on a ‘Case-by-Case’ Treatment of Article 12(3) Declarations”, Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 243-248
- STAHN, C., EL ZEIDY, M.M., OLÁSOLOR, H., “The International Criminal Court’s ad hoc jurisdiction revisited”, AJIL, 2005, Vol. 99 (2), pp. 421-431
- TOMUSCHAT, C., “Article 36”, en ZIMMERMANN y otros (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice, 2006, p. 628
- VACAS, F., “El reconocimiento de la jurisdicción y la ratificación del estatuto de la CPI por el Estado de Palestina: un proceso complejo con importantes consecuencias jurídicas”, REEI, Nº 30, 2015, DOI: 10.17103/reei.30.12, concretamente pp. 10-11.
- VAUGHAN LOWE, Q.C., “Legal Opinion on the Article 12(3) Declaration in the Egypt Situation”, 18 de marzo de 2013 (referencia incluida en https://www.icccpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1831527.pdf)
- VIDMAR, J., “Does General Assembly Resolution 67/19 Have Any Implications for the legal status of Palestine?, disponible en http://www.ejiltalk.org/does-general-assembly-resolution-6719-have-anyimplications-for-the-legal-status-of-palestine/.
- WILLIAMS, S.A., y SCHABAS, W.A en TRIFFTERER, O., Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Observer’s Notes, Article by Article, Baden Baden: Nomos, 1999 pp. 547-562.
- EL ZEIDY, M.M., “Ad hoc Declarations of Acceptance of Jurisdiction. The Palestinian Situation Under Scrutiny” en The Law and Practice of the International Criminal Court (STAHN, C., Ed.), Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 179-209, p. 189-190
- EL ZEIDY, M.M., “The Legitimacy of Withdrawing State Party Referrals and Ad hoc Declarations under the Statute of International Criminal Court”, en The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (STAHN, C., SLUITER, G., Eds), Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009, p. 76
- ZIMMERMANN, A., “Palestine and the International Criminal Court Quo Vadis?, Journal of International Criminal Justice 11 (2013), pp. 303-329