Predictors of Beliefs in Intergroup Forgiveness in a Chilean General Population Sample

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aguilar P., Balcells L., & Cebolla H. (2011). Las actitudes de los españoles ante las medidas de justicia transicional relativas a la guerra civil y al franquismo [Spaniard’s attitudes towards civil war and francoism’s transitional justice measures]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69, 59–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/ris.2009.06.30
• Avruch K. (2010). Truth and reconciliation commissions: Problems in transitional justice and the reconstruction of identity. Transcultural Psychiatry, 47, 33–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363461510362043
• Bar-Tal D. (Ed.) (2011). Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: Social psychological perspective. Hove, UK and New York, NY: Psychology Press: Frontiers of Social Psychology Series.
• Baumeister R. F., Exline J. J., & Sommer K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological principles (pp. 79–106). Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
• Bellelli G., Leone G., & Cursi A. (1999). Emoción y memoria colectiva. El recuerdo de los acontecimientos públicos [Emotion and collective memory. The memory of public events]. Psicología política, 18, 101–124.
• Beristain C. M., Páez D., Rimé B., & Kanyangara P. (2010). Psychosocial effects of participation in rituals of transitional justice. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193450
• Brahms E. (2009). What is a truth commission and why does it matter? Peace and Conflict Review, 3, 1–14.
• Brounéus K. (2008). Truth-telling as talking cure? Insecurity and Retraumatization in the Rwandan Gacaca Courts. Security Dialogue, 39, 55–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010607086823
• Brown R., González R., Zagefka H. Manzi J., & Cehajic S. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt and shame as predictors of reparation for historical wrongdoing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.75
• Brown R., & Cehajic S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.466
• Cárdenas M., Páez D., & Rimé B. (2013a). El impacto psicosocial de los procesos transicionales en Chile: Evaluación de los efectos de las Comisiones Nacional de “Verdad y Reconciliación” y “prisión política y tortura” [The psychosocial impact of transitional processes in Chile: Assessing the impact of the National Commissions on “Truth and Reconciliation” and “Political Imprisonment and Torture”]. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 145–156.
• Cárdenas M., Páez D., & Rimé B. (2013b). Transitional justice processes, shared narrative memory about past collective violence and reconciliation. In R. Cabecinhas & L. Abadia (Eds.). Narratives and social memory: Theoretical and methodological approaches (pp. 61–75). Braga, Portugal: University of Minho.
• Cárdenas M., Páez D., Rimé B., Bilbao A., & Asún D. (2014). Personal emotions, emotional climate, social sharing, beliefs, and values among people affected and unaffected by past political violence. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 452–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000038
• Cárdenas M., Páez D., Arnoso M., & Rimé B. (2013). Percepción del clima socioemocional y la confianza institucional en víctimas de violencia política: Valoración del impacto de la comisión nacional de verdad y reconciliación [The perception of the socio-emotional climate and institutional trust in victims of political violence: Impact assessment of the national commission of truth and reconciliation]. Psykhe, 22, 111–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.22.2.572
• Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (1991). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación [Report of the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation]. Santiago, Chile: Andros Impresores.
• Comisión Nacional de Prisión Política y Tortura (2014). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Prisión Política y Tortura [Report of the National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture]. Santiago, Chile: Author. Retrieved from http://www.comisionvalech.gov.cl/InformeValech.html
• De Rivera J., & Páez D. (2007). Emotional climates, human security, and cultures of peace. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 233–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00506.x
• Devos T., Silver L. A., Mackie D. M., & Smith E. R. (2002). Experiencing intergroup emotions. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 113–134). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Dresler-Hawke E., & Liu J. H. (1996). Collective shame and the positioning of German national identity. Psicología Política, 32, 131–153.
• Etxeberría I., Conejero S., & Pascual A. (2011). La culpa en contextos de violencia política [Guilt in contexts of political violence]. In D. Páez, M. Beristain, J. L. González, N. Basabe, & J. de Rivera (Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo cultura de paz [Overcoming collective violence and building a culture of peace] (pp. 39–68). Madrid, Spain: Fundamentos.
• Fehr R., Gelfand M. J., & Nag M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019993
• Fredrickson B. (2009). Positivity. New York, NY: Crown. Hayner P. B. (2001). Unspeakable truths: Confronting state terror and atrocity. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2003). Censo 2002. Síntesis de Resultados. [Census 2002. Summary of Results] Santiago, Chile: La Nación SA. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl/cd2002/sintesiscensal.pdf
• Jelin E., & Langland I. (2003). Monumentos, memoriales y marcas territoriales [Monuments, memorials and territorial markings]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Siglo XXI.
• Kaminer D., Stein D. J., Mbanga I., & Zungu-Dirwayi N. (2001). The truth and reconciliation commission in South Africa: Relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights violations. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 373–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.178.4.373
• Kanyangara P. (2008). Justice et verite après un genocide: Impact psychosocial sur le pardon et la reconciliation [Justice and truth after genocide: Psychosocial impact on forgiveness and reconciliation]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculte de Psychologie. Louvain, Belgique.
• Kanyangara P., Rimé B., Philippot P., & Yzerbit V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in Gacaca tribunals and the assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00515.x
• Lira E. (2010). La reparación a las víctimas: Una responsabilidad del Estado [The reparation to victims: A state responsibility]. Mensaje, 59, 6–11.
• Lira E. (2011). Verdad, reparación y justicia: El pasado que sigue vivo en el presente [Truth, justice and reparation: The past is still alive in the present]. In Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos. Contribución de las políticas de verdad, justicia y reparación a las democracias en América Latina [Contribution of policies of truth, justice and reparation for democracies in Latin America] (pp.85–127). San José, Costa Rica: IIDH.
• Mackie D. M., & Smith E. R. (Eds.) (2002). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Manzi J. (2006). Memoria colectiva del golpe de estado en Chile [Collective memory of the coup d’etat in Chile]. In M. Carretero, A. Rosa, & M. F. González (Eds.), Enseñanza de la historia y memoria colectiva [Teaching history and collective memory]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
• Manzi J., Ruiz S., Krause M., Meneses A., Haye A., & Kronmüller E. (2004). Memoria colectiva del golpe de Estado de 1973 en Chile [Collective memory of the 1973 military coup in Chile]. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 38, 153–169.
• Manzi J., & González R. (2007). Forgiveness and reparation in Chile: The role of cognitive and emotional intergroup antecedents. Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 71–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0094025
• Morton T. A., & Postmes T. (2011). Moral duty or moral defense? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of in-group perpetrated harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 127–134.
• Mullet E., Nann S., Kandiangandu J., Neto F., & Pinto M. da C. (2011). Hacia una política positiva: El caso del perdón en el contexto intergrupal de África y Asia [Towards a positive policy: The case of intergroup forgiveness in the context of Africa and Asia]. In D. Páez, M. Beristain, J. L. González, N. Basabe, & J. de Rivera (Eds.), Superando la violencia colectiva y construyendo cultura de paz [Overcoming collective violence and building a culture of peace] (pp. 377–398). Madrid, Spain: Fundamentos.
• Nadler A., & Schnabel N. (2008). Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation (pp.37–56). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Nadler A., Malloy T. E., & Fisher J. D. (2008). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Noor M., Brown R., & Prentice G. (2008). Prospects for intergroup reconciliation: Social-psychological predictors of intergroup forgiveness and reparation in Northern Ireland and Chile. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Páez D. (2010). Official or political apologies and improvement of intergroup relations: A neo-Durkheimian approach to official apologies as rituals. Revista de Psicología Social: International Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 101–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1174/021347410790193504
• Philpot C. R., & Hornsey M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effects of intergroup apologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311283
• Rimé B., Finkenauer C., Luminet O., Zech E., & Philippot P. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), (pp. 845–189). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Rimé B., Kanyangara P., Yzerbyt V., & Paez D. (2011). The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda: Psychosocial effects of participation in a truth and reconciliation process after a genocide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 695–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.822
• Sikkink K., & Booth Walling C. (2007). The Impact of human rights in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 427–445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078953
• Staub E., Pearlman L. A., Gubin A., & Hagengimana A. (2005). Healing, reconciliation, forgiving and the prevention of violence after genocide or mass killing: An intervention and its experimental evaluation in Rwanda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 297–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.3.297.65617
• Stroebe W., & Stroebe M. (1996). The social psychology of social support. In T. Higgins & W. Kruglanski: Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 597–622). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Tam T., Hewston M., Cairns E., Tausch N., Maio G., & Kenworthy J. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430207071345
• Tam T., Hewstone M., Kenworthy J. B., Cairns E., Marinetti C., Geddes L., & Parkinson B. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00563.x
• van Tongeren D. R., Burnette J. L., O’Boyle E., Worthington E. L. Jr., & Forsyth D. R. (2014). A metaanalysis of intergroup forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 81–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.844268
• Vázquez C., & Páez D. (2011). Post-traumatic growth in Spain. In T. Weiss & R. Berger (Eds.), Post-traumatic growth and culturally competent practice (pp. 97–112). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
• Wohl M. J. A., Hornsey M. J., & Bennett S. H. (2012). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 306–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024838
• Wohl M. J. A., & Branscombe N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288
• Zech E., Rimé B., & Nils F. (2004). Social sharing of emotion, emotional recovery, and interpersonal aspects. In P. Philippot & R. Feldman (Eds.). The regulation of emotion (pp. 159–188). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.