Adaptation and Validation of the Basque Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory in Higher Education

  1. Goretti Soroa 1
  2. Aitor Aritzeta 1
  3. Nekane Balluerka 1
  4. Arantxa Gorostiaga 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 19

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2016.26 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumen

Emotional creativity is defined as the ability to feel and express emotions in a new, effective and authentic way. There are currently no Basque-language self-report instruments to provide valid and reliable measures of this construct. Thus, this paper describes the process of adapting and validating the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) for the Basque-speaking population. The sample was comprised of 594 higher education students (388 women and 206 men) aged between 18 and 32 years old (M age = 20.47; SD = 2.48). The Basque version of the ECI was administered along with the TMMS-23, NEO PI-R, and PANAS. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on the Basque ECI corroborated the original scale’s three-factor structure (preparedness, novelty, and effectiveness/authenticity). Those dimensions showed acceptable indexes of internal consistency (α = .80, .83, and .83) and temporal stability (r = .70, .69, and .74). The study also provided some evidence of external validity (p < .05) based on the relationships found between emotional creativity and emotional intelligence, personality, affect, and sex. The Basque ECI can be regarded as a useful tool to evaluate perceived emotional creativity during the preparation and verification phases of the creative process.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Amabile T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.5.997
  • Arbuckle J. L. (2011). AMOS 20.0 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: AMOS Development Corporation.
  • Averill J. R. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research and experience (Vol. 1, pp. 305–339). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Averill J. R. (1990). Emotions as related to systems of behavior. In N. L. Stein, B. Leventhal, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 385–404). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • Averill J. R. (1999a). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 67, 331–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00058
  • Averill J. R. (1999b). Creativity in the domain of emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 765–782). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Averill J. R. (2004). A tale of two snarks: Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity compared. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 228–233.
  • Averill J. R. (2005). Emotions as mediators and as products of creative activity. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 225–243). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Averill J. R., & Thomas-Knowles C. (1991). Emotional creativity. In K. T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies on emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 269–299). London, UK: Wiley.
  • Baas M., De Dreu C. K. W., & Nijstad B. A. (2008). A metaanalysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
  • Baas M., De Dreu C. K. W., & Nijstad B. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022981
  • Bakhtiyari K., Alizadeh H., & Rezaee O. (2014). Investigation of relationship between “cognitive creativity and emotional intelligence” and “personality dimensions and academic success” in high school teachers. Reef Resources Assessment and Management Technical Paper, 40, 81–991.
  • Balluerka N., Gorostiaga A., Alonso-Arbiol I., & Haranburu M. (2007). La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: Una perspectiva práctica [Adapting measurement instruments cross-culturally: A practical perspective]. Psicothema, 19, 124–133.
  • Banerjee M., Capozzoli M., McSweeney L., & Sinha D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 3–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3315487
  • Bledow R., Rosing K., & Frese M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 432–450. http://dx.doi. org/10.5465/amj.2010.0894
  • Carmeli A., McKay A. S., & Kaufman J. C. (2014). Emotional intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of generosity and vigor. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 290–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.53
  • Carretero-Dios H., & Pérez C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales [Norms for developing and reviewing instrumental studies]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 521–551.
  • Feist G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative person. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fuchs G. L., Kumar V. K., & Porter J. (2007). Emotional creativity, alexithymia, and styles of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 233–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10400410701397313
  • Ghadiri Nezhdyan F., & Abdi B. (2010). Factor structure of Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI-Averill, 1999) among Iranian undergraduate students in Tehran universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1836–1840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.374
  • Goleman D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  • Gorostiaga A., Balluerka N., Alonso-Arbiol I., & Haranburu M. (2011). Validation of the Basque Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 193–205. http://dx.doi. org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000067
  • Gorostiaga A., Balluerka N., Aritzeta A., Haranburu M., & Alonso-Arbiol I. (2011). Measuring perceived emotional intelligence in adolescent population: Validation of the Short Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-23). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 523–537.
  • Gutbezhal J., & Averill J. R. (1996). Individual differences in emotional creativity as manifested in words and pictures. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 327–337. http://dx.doi. org/10.1207/s15326934crj0904_4
  • Hambleton R. K., & Patsula L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1, 1–30.
  • Humphreys J., Jiao N., & Sadler T. (2008). Emotional disposition and leadership preferences of American and Chinese MBA Students. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3, 162–180.
  • Ivcevic Z., Brackett M. A., & Mayer J. D. (2007). Emotional intelligence and emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 75, 199–236. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00437.x
  • Jöreskog K. G., & Sörbom D. (2003). LISREL 8.50 & Prelis 2.50. Scientific Software International, 6, 1–55.
  • Martínez-Arias M. R., Hernández-Lloreda M. J., & Hernández-Lloreda M. V. (2006). Psicometría. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.
  • Mayer J. D., & Salovey P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • McCrae R. R., & Costa P. T. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0191-8869(03)00118-1
  • Mishra S. (2014). Creative thinking of high school students in relation to their emotional intelligence. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 2, 197–204.
  • Parke M. R., Seo M. G., & Sherf E. N. (2014). Regulating and facilitating: The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 1309–1331. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/a0038452
  • Phelps E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. psych.56.091103.070234
  • Refaeilzadeh P., Tang L., & Liu L. (2009). Cross-validation. In L. Liu & M. Tamer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of database systems (pp. 532–538). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Robles R., & Páez F. (2003). Estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS) [Study of the Spanish translation and psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS)]. Salud Mental, 26, 69–75.
  • Runco M. A., & Jaeger G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  • Salovey P., Mayer J. D., Goldman S., Turvey C., & Palfai T. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Scherer K. R. (2000). Psychological models of emotion. In J. C. Borod (Ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion (pp. 137–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt F. L., Le H., & Ilies R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects that different sources of measurement error have on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8, 206–224. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.206
  • Schreiber J. B., Nora A., Stage F. K., Barlow E. A., & King J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337. http://dx.doi. org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  • Soroa G., Balluerka N., Hommel B., & Aritzeta A. (2015). Assessing interactions between cognition, emotion, and motivation in creativity processes: The construction and validation of EDICOS. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 45–58.
  • Soroa G., Gorostiaga A., Aritzeta A., & Balluerka N. (2015). A shortened Spanish version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory (the ECI-S). Creativity Research Journal, 27, 232–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10400419.2015.1030313
  • Tabachnick B. G., & Fidell L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Pearson.
  • Wallas G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
  • Walton A. P., & Kemmelmeier M. (2012). Creativity in its social context: The interplay of organizational norms, situational threat, and gender. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 208–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 10400419.2012.677345
  • Wheaton B., Muthén B., Alwin D., & Summers G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). New Jersey, NJ: Wiley.
  • Whittaker T. A. (2011). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 694–701. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607726
  • Wolfradt U., & Pretz J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/per.409.abs
  • Zacher H., & Johnson E. (2015). Leadership and creativity in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1210–1225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881340
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet