Parental mediation strategies in Spain: predicting factors for different strategies

  1. Maialen Garmendia Larrañaga 1
  2. Miguel Ángel Casado Del Río 1
  3. Gemma Martinez 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Zer: Revista de estudios de comunicación = Komunikazio ikasketen aldizkaria

ISSN: 1137-1102

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 20

Número: 39

Páginas: 13-27

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1387/ZER.15513 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Zer: Revista de estudios de comunicación = Komunikazio ikasketen aldizkaria

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Adin txikikoek internetekin erlazionatzeko duten moduari faktore askok eragiten diote. Guraso-bitartekaritza dugu faktore horietan garrantzitsuenetako bat. Bitartekaritza modu desberdinek adin txikikoen eta teknologia berrien arteko erlazioari ekartzen dizkioten ondorioak erakutsi dituzte hainbat lanek. Kids Online inkestak Espainian lortutako datuetatik abiatuta, guraso-bitartekaritzaren era desberdinak nola ezarri diren azaltzen du artikulu honek. Gurasoek aplikatutako bitartekaritza motan hiru faktorek –interneti buruzko ezagutza, hezkuntza maila eta maila sozio-ekonomikoa– duten eragina ere aztertzen du lanak.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bringué, X. and Sádaba, C. (2009). La Generación Interactiva en España. Niños y Adolescentes ante las Pantallas. Barcelona: Colección Fundación Telefónica, Ariel.
  • Buckingham, David (2000). After the Death of Childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Bushmann, Brad J. and Anderson Craig A. (2001). “Media Violence and the American Public: Scientific Facts versus Media Misinformation”, American Psychologist, 56 (6/7), 2001, pp. 477-489.
  • Bybee, Carl, Robinson, Danny and Turow, Joseph (1982). “Determinants of Parental Guidance of Children's Television Viewing for a Special Subgroup: Mass Media Scholars”, Journal of Broadcasting, 26, 1982, pp. 697-710.
  • Duimel, M., and De Haan, Jos (2009). “ICT en Cultuur: het gebruik door tieners [ICT and Culture: how teenagers use the opportunities]”. Den Haag: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research-SCP.
  • Eastin, Matthew. S. Greenberg, Bradley, and Hofshire, Linda (2006). “Parenting the Internet”, Journal of Communication, 56, pp. 486-504.
  • Garmendia, Maialen, Garitaonandia, Carmelo, Martinez, Gemma and Casado, Miguel Angel (2012). “The effectiveness of parental mediation”, in Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie and Gorzig, Anke (eds.), Children, risk and safety on the internet. Research and policy challenges in comparative perspectives, The polity press, London, pp. 229-242.
  • Garmendia, Maialen, Garitaonandia, Carmelo, Martinez, Gemma and Casado, Miguel Ángel (2013). “Las madres y padres, los menores e internet. Estrategias de mediación parental en España”, DOXA,13.
  • Hasebrink, Uwe, Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie and Ólafsson, Kartjan (2009). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online, LSE, London EU Kids Online. At: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EUKidsOnline/Reports/Default.htm#generate d-subheading1
  • Kirwil, Lucyna, Garmendia, Maialen, Garitaonandia, Carmelo and Martinez Fernandez, Gemma (2009). “Parental Mediation”, in Livingstone Sonia and Haddon, Leslie (eds.), Kids Online: Opportunities and Risks for Children, Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 99-215.
  • Koolstra, Cees M. and Lucassen, Nicole (2004). “Viewing behavior of children and TV guidance by parents: A comparison of parents and child reports” Communications, 29, pp. 179-198.
  • Lin, Carolyn A. and Atkin, David J. (1989). “Parental Mediation and Rulemaking for Adolescent Use of Television and VCRs”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 33 (1), pp. 53-67.
  • Livingstone, Sonia (2007). “Strategies of parental regulation in a media rich home”, Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(3), pp. 640-4.
  • Livingstone, Sonia and Bovill, Moira (2001). Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
  • Livingstone, Sonia and Helsper, Ellen J. (2008). “Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), pp. 581-599.
  • Livingstone, Sonia an
  • d Bober, Moira (2006). “Regulating the Internet at home: Contrasting the perspectives of children and parents” in Buckingham, David, and Willett, Rebekah (eds.), Digital generations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., pp. 93-113.
  • Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie, Görzig, Anke, and Ólafsson, Kartjan (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings.
  • Lwin, May O., Stanaland, Andrea J.S. and Miyazaki, Anthony D.”, Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness”, Journal of Retailing, 84, 2008, pp. 205-217.
  • Oswell, David (1999). “The dark side of cyberspace: Internet content regulation and child protection”, Convergence: The Journal of research into new media technologies, 5(4), pp. 42-62.
  • Prensky, Mark (2001). “Digital natives, digital immigrants”, On the Horizon, 9 (5), pp. 1-6.
  • Ribak, Rivka and Turow, Joseph (2003). “Internet Power and Social Context: A Globalization Approach to Web Privacy Concerns”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47 (3), pp. 328-349.
  • Selwyn, Neil (2003). “Doing IT for the Kids’: Re-examining Children, Computers and the Information Society”. Media, Culture and Society, 25 (3), pp. 351-378.
  • Silverstone, Roger and Haddon, Leslie (1996). “Design and the Domestication of ICTs: Technical Change and Everyday Life” in Silverstone, Roger and Mansell, Robin (eds), The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies, Communication by Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 44-74.
  • Silverstone, Roger, Hirsch, Eric and Morley, David (1992). “Information and Communication Technologies and the Moral Economy of the Household” in Silverstone Roger and Hirsch Eric (eds). Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, Routledge, London, pp. 15-31.
  • Schofield Clark, L. (2011). “Parental Mediation Theory for the Digital Age”, Communication Theory 21(4), pp. 323-343.
  • Valkenburg, Patti, M., Krcmar, Marina, Peeters, Allerd L. and Marseille, Nies M. (1999). “Developing a Scale to Assess Three Styles of Television Mediation: Instructive Mediation, Restrictive Mediation, and Social Co-viewing”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), pp. 52-66.
  • Van Den Bergh, Bea and Van Den Bulck, Jan (2000). “Parental media guidance, communication and selfconcept in pre-adolescents” in Van Den Bergh, Bea and Van Den Bulck, Jan (eds.). Children and media: multidisciplinary approaches, Garant Publishers, Leuven, BE, pp. 151-174.
  • Van der Voort, T., Van Lil, J., and Peeters, A. (1998). “Determinants of parental television guidance as reported by parents versus children”, Medienpsychologie, 10, pp. 165-183.
  • Warren, Ron (2005). “Parental mediation of children’s television viewing in low income families”, Journal of Communication, 55, pp. 847.863.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet