Transferring landscape values using discrete choice experimentsIs meta-analysis an option?

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M. and Louviere, J. (1998). "Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiment and contingent valuation". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1): 64-75. http://doi.org/dg5gn6.
• Álvarez-Farizo, B. and Hanley, N. (2002). "Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms: An example from Spain". Energy Policy, 30(2): 107-116. http://doi.org/dkpc48.
• Antrop, M., Sevenant, M., Tagliafierro, C., Van Eetvelde, V. and Witlox, F. (2013). "Setting a framework for valuing the multifunctional landscape and its multiple perceptions". In Van der Heide, C.M. and Heijman, W. (Eds.): The Economic Value of Landscapes. Routledge, London and New York: 23-52.
• Barrio, M. and Loureiro, M.L. (2010). "A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies". Ecological Economics, 69(5): 1023-1030. http://doi.org/dqhnf9.
• Bateman, I.J. and Jones, A.P. (2003). "Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values". Land Economics, 79(2): 235-258. DOI:10.3368/le.79.2.235.
• Bateman, I.J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D.N., Dubgaard, A. et al. (2011). "Making benefit transfers work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe". Environmental and Resource Economics, 50(3): 365-387. http://doi.org/bm7vjz.
• Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B.H., Hanemann, W.M., Hanley, N., Hett, T. et al. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preferences Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Baumgart, K., (2005). Bewertung landschaftsrelevanter projekte im Schweizer Alpenraum-Die methode der discrete-choice-experimente. Ph.D. Thesis, Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern.
• Bennett, J. and Blamey, R. (2001). The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Bergmann, A., Hanley, N. and Wright, R. (2006). "Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments". Energy Policy, 34(9): 1004-1014. http://doi.org/b225h7.
• Bergstrom, J.C. and Taylor, L.O. (2006). "Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice". Ecological Economics, 60(2): 351-360. http://doi.org/fn228m.
• Borresch, R., Maas, S., Schmitz, K. and Shcmitz, P.M. (2009). "Modelling the value of a multifunctional landscape-A discrete choice experiment". Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Conference, Beijing, China.
• Boyle, K.J., Kuminoff, N.V., Parmeter, C.F. and Pope, J.C. (2009). "Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 9(5): 1328-1334. http://doi.org/bszh9g.
• Brander, L.M., Florax, R.J.G.M. and Vermaat, J.E. (2006). "The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature". Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(2): 223-250. http://doi.org/bw2zdx.
• Brander, L.M., Van Beukering, P. and Cesar, H. (2007). "The recreational value of coral reefs: A meta-analysis". Ecological Economics, 63(1): 209-218. http://doi.org/dmjxm4.
• Brouwer, R. and Bateman, I.J. (2005). "Benefits transfer of willingness to pay estimates and functions for health-risk reductions: A cross-country study". Journal of Health Economics, 24(3): 591-611. http://doi.org/d27dq4.
• Brouwer, R. and Spaninks, F.A. (1999). The validity of environmental benefits transfer:Further empirical testing. Environmental and Resource Economics, 14(1): 95-117. http://doi.org/bzpx48.
• Brouwer, R., Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Turner, R.K. (1999). "A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies". Regional Environmental Change, 1(1): 47-57. http://doi.org/cd8c7v.
• Bullock, C., Elston, D.A. and Chalmers, N.A. (1998). "An application of economic choice experiments to a traditional land use-Deer hunting and landscape change in the Scottish Highlands". Journal of Environmental Management, 52(4): 335-351. http://doi.org/fp3ghs.
• Colombo, S. and Hanley, N.D. (2008). "How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method". Land Economics, 84(1): 128-147. DOI: 10.3368/le.84.1.128.
• Colombo, S., Calatrava-Requena, J. and Hanley, N. (2007). "Testing choice experiment for benefit transfer with preference heterogeneity". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1): 135-151. http://doi.org/d6cc6v.
• Colombo, S., Hanley, N. and Calatrava-Requena, J. (2005). "Designing policy for reducing the off-farm effects of soil erosion using choice experiments". Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(1): 81-95. http://doi.org/fm2pzx.
• Domínguez-Torreiro, M. and Soliño, M. (2011). "Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: Implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas". Ecological Economics, 70(12): 2523-2531. http://doi.org/ck3qf2.
• Elsasser, P., Englert, H. and Hamilton, J. (2010). "Landscape benefits of a forest conversion programme in North East Germany: Results of a choice experiment". Annals of Forest Research, 53(1): 37-50.
• Florax, R.J.G.M., Nijkamp, P. and Willis, K.G. (2002). "Meta-analysis and value transfer: Comparative assessment of scientific knowledge". In Florax, R.J.G.M., Nijkamp, P. and Willis, K.G. (Eds.): Comparative Environmental Economic Assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 3-18. DOI: 10.4337/1840642602.00009.
• Ghermandi, A., Van der Bergh, J.C.J.M., Brander, L.M., de Groot, H.L.F. and Nunes, P.A.L.D. (2008). The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: A meta-analysis. Working paper 238, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Available from: http://services.bepress.com/feem/paper238. [January, 2014].
• Glass, G.V. (1976). "Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research". Educational researcher, 5(10): 3-8. http://doi.org/dnb83x.
• Hasund. K.P., Kataria, M. and Lagerkvist, C.L. (2011). "Valuing public goods of the agricultural landscape: A choice experiment using reference points to capture observable heterogeneity". Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(1): 31-53. http://doi.org/dxmf7p.
• Hoyos, D., Mariel, P. and Fernández-Macho, J. (2009). "The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence". Ecological Economics, 68(8-9): 2372-2381. http://doi.org/dc74h2.
• Johnston, R.J. and Rosenberger, R.S. (2010). "Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer". Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3): 479-510. http://doi.org/fgh97v.
• Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y. and Wardwell, R.F. (2003). "Modeling relationships between use and non-use values for surface water quality: A meta-analysis". Water Resources Research, 39(12): 1363. http://doi.org/b6km2s.
• Johnston, R.J., Besedin, E.Y., Iovanna, R., Miller, C., Wardwell, R. and Ranson, M. (2005). "Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: A meta-analysis". Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(2-3): 221-248. http://doi.org/fkfvhf.
• Lindhjem, H. (2007). "20 Years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: A meta-analysis". Journal of Forest Economics, 12(4): 251-277. http://doi.org/bw355w.
• Liu, S. and Stern, D.I. (2008). A meta-analysis of contingent valuation studies in coastal and near-shore marine ecosystems. Working paper 11720, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Munich University. Available from: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/11608. [January, 2014].
• Martín-Ortega, J. (2012). "Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive". Environmental Science & Policy, 24: 83-91. http://doi.org/sn4.
• Martín-Ortega, J., Brouwer, R., Ojea, E. and Berbel, J. (2012). "Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements". Journal of Environmental Management, 106: 22-29. http://doi.org/sn5.
• Meyerhoff, J., Liebe, U. and Hartje, V. (2009). "Benefits of biodiversity enhancement of nature-oriented silviculture: Evidence from two choice experiments in Germany". Journal of Forest Economics, 15(1-2): 37-58. http://doi.org/dmrhc8.
• Moran, D., McVittie, A., Allcroft, D. and Elston, D. (2004). Beauty, Beast and Biodiversity:What Does the Public Want from Agriculture? Final report to the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD), Scotland.
• Morrison, M. and Bergland, O. (2006). "Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer". Ecological Economics, 60(2): 420-428. http://doi.org/fkcgsn.
• Muthke, T. and Holm-Mueller, K. (2004). "National and international benefit transfer testing with a rigorous test procedure". Environmental and Resource Economics, 29(3): 323-336. http://doi.org/b268tm.
• Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (2007). "Review of methods for value transfer". In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.): Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Springer, Netherlands: 1-10. http://doi.org/bf6wg7.
• Nelson, J.P. and Kennedy, P.E. (2009). "The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and resource economics: An assessment". Environmental and Resource Economics, 42(3): 345-377. http://doi.org/ck9ph7.
• Pattanayak, S.K, Smith, V.K. and Van Houtven, G. (2007). "Improving the practice of benefits transfer: A preference calibration approach". In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.): Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Springer, Netherlands:241-260. http://doi.org/bqxr36.
• Richardson, L. and Loomis, J. (2009). "The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis". Ecological Economics, 68(5): 1535-1548. http://doi.org/dv2bfx.
• Rolfe, J. (2006). "A simple guide to choice modelling and benefit transfer". In Rolfe, J. and Bennett, J. (Eds.): Choice Modelling and the Transfer of Environmental Values. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 10-27.
• Rolfe, J. and Brouwer, R. (2012). "Design effects in a meta-analysis of river health choice experiments in Australia". Journal of Choice Modelling, 5(2): 81-97. http://doi.org/sn6.
• Rosenberger, R.S. and Loomis, J.B. (2000). "Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer:In-sample convergent validity tests for an outdoor recreation database". Water Resources Research, 36(4): 1097-1107. http://doi.org/d4rhbs.
• Rosenberger, R.S. and Stanley, T.D. (2006). "Measurement, generalization and publication:Sources of error in benefit transfers and their management". Ecological Economics, 60(2): 372-378. http://doi.org/c3pmqb.
• Rulleau, B., Dehez, J. and Point, P. (2008). "Valuing preferences for outdoor recreation in French forests: A choice experiment approach". Paper presented at the Thematic Meeting of the French Economic Association: "Frontiers in Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Management", Toulouse.
• Santos, J.M.L. (2007). "Transferring landscape values: How and how accurately?" In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.): Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Springer, Netherlands: 45-75. http://doi.org/cds7jh.
• Scarpa, R., Hutchinson, W.G., Chilton, S.M., and Buongiorno, J. (2007). "Benefit value transfers conditional on site attributes: Some evidence of reliability from forest recreation in Ireland". In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.): Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Springer, Netherlands: 179-206. http://doi.org/cbqzf2.
• Schmitz, K. (2006). Die bewertung von multifunktionalität der landschaft mir diskreten choice experimenten. Ph.D. Thesis, Zentrum für internationale Entwicklungs-und Umweltforschung (ZEU), Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen.
• Schmitz, K., Schmitz, P.M. and Wronka, T.C. (2003). "Bewertung von landschaftsfunktionen mit choice experiments (Assessment of landscape function with choice experiments)". Agrarwirtschaft (German Journal of Agricultural Economics), 52(8): 379-389.
• Shrestha, R.K., Rosenberger, R.S., and Loomis, J.B. (2007). "Benefit transfer using meta-analysis in recreation economic valuation". In Navrud, S. and Ready, R. (Eds.): Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Springer, Netherlands:161-177. http://doi.org/b6fcgg.
• Smith, V.K. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2002). "Is meta-analysis a Noah's ark for non-market valuation?" Environmental and Resource Economics, 22(1-2): 271-296. http://doi.org/bjrf9z.
• Van Houtven, G., Powers J. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2007). "Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis?" Resource and Energy Economics, 29(3): 206-228. http://doi.org/d9crvv.
• Woodward, R.T. and Wui, Y.S. (2001). "The economic value of wetland services: A meta-analysis". Ecological Economics, 37(2): 257-270. http://doi.org/b8z3j6.
• Zandersen, M. and Tol, R.S.J. (2009). "A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe". Journal of Forest Economics, 15(1-2): 109-130. http://doi.org/c9cz64.