Evolución del capital de solvencia requerido en las aseguradoras españolas hasta solvencia II

  1. Garayeta Bajo, Asier
  2. Iturricastillo Plazaola, Iván
  3. Peña Esteban, Joseba Iñaki de la
Aldizkaria:
Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

ISSN: 0534-3232

Argitalpen urtea: 2012

Zenbakia: 18

Orrialdeak: 111-150

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles

Laburpena

A fundamental pillar of our society is to ensure the quality of insurance companies through the implementation of its liabilities to policyholders. In fact, the laws and the supervisors are looking for the protection of insurance consumers and markets becomes efficient, stable and safe-keeping. On the other hand, the capital of the insurance company is an element of guarantee that it can meet liabilities with policies, constitutes one of the main instruments for the protection of consumers. The new framework for the valuation of the solvency of insurance companies is regulated into the European Union by Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November (Solvency II). The aim is to measure and valuate the whole risks that the company has. This should allow quantifying the appropriate level of technical provisions and the amount of adequate capital according to the risks to which it is exposed.This approach is, up to now, the last framework of the solvency for insurance companies. It has taken more than 30 years to reach the current regulation of the solvency guaranteeing capital. This paper analyzes the evolution in the calculation of the capital, from a purely static approach of the company to a dynamic view of the insurance business.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Albarrán Lozano, Irene y Alonso González, Pablo. (2010). Métodos estocásticos de estimación de las provisiones técnicas en el marco de Solvencia II. Fundación MAPFRE, Instituto de Ciencias del Seguro, pp. 15-32.
  • Alonso González Pablo. (2007 a). Solvencia II o el riesgo como eje central. Actuarios nº 26, julio 2007, pp. 27-29.
  • Biffis, E. y Millossovich., P. (2006). The fair value of guaranteed annuity options. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. Vol. 1.
  • Blanco-Morales, Guillén Estany, M. Domínguez Fabián, I. (2010). Estudio sobre el sector asegurador en España 2010. Fundación de Estudios Financieros.
  • Carpenter, Guy. (2007). SOLVENCY II: QIS 3 is out now, April; http://www.guycarp.com/portal/extranet/pdf_2007/GCBriefings/FIT%20Briefing%20-%20Solvency%20II-QIS%203.pdf (10 de noviembre 2011)
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2005 a). QIS1 Specifications, Spreadsheets, Guidance QIS1 Cover Note
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2005 b). QIS1 Specifications, Spreadsheets, Guidance QIS1 specification Technical provisions
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2006 a). QIS1 Final report QIS1 Summary report
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2006 b). QIS2 Specifications, Spreadsheets, Guidance QIS2 Cover Note
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2006 c). QIS2 Specifications, Spreadsheets, Guidance QIS2 Technical specification; Technical provisions
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2006 d). QIS2 Final report QIS2 Summary report
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2007 a). QIS3 Specifications, Spreadsheets, Guidance QIS3 Technical specification Technical provisions part1
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2007 b). QIS3 Final report QIS3. Summary report
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2007 c). QIS3 Final report MCR Pros and Cons Paper
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2008 a). QIS4 CEIOPS, Report on its Fourth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS4) for Solvency II
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2008 b). QIS4 Call for Advice, Guidance and Specifications: Manual; Call for Advice from EC to CEIOPS
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2008 c). QIS4 Call for Advice, Guidance and Specifications: Manual; Technical Specifications QIS4
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2010). QIS5, Technical Specifications
  • CEIOPS. Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors. (2011). QIS5 Final report QIS5 EIOPA report on the fifth Quantitative Impact Study for Solvency II
  • Devineu, Laurent; Loisel, Stephane. (2009). Risk aggregation in Solvency II: How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula?. Bulletin Français d'Actuariat nº 9, 18. 107-145
  • Eling, Martin; Schmeiser, Hato; Schmit, Joan T. (2007). The Solvency II Process: Overview and Critical Analysis. Risk Management & Insurance Review Journal, p. 70-75.
  • IAA. International Actuarial Association. (2009). A global framework for insurer Solvency Assesment-Un marco global para la evaluación de la solvencia del asegurador. Trad. Mayoral, Rosa; Moreno, Rafael y Dan Lerner, Andrés.
  • IAA. International Actuarial Association. (2004). Changes in Accounting Policy while under International Financial Reporting Standards.
  • IASB. (2003 a). International Accounting Standard 39. Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. December.
  • IASB. (2003 b). Fair value hedge accounting for a portfolio hedge of interest rate risk. Exposure draft of proposed Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.
  • IASB. (2005). The fair value option. Amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, June.
  • Jones, Rob; Rief, Wolfgang; Le Pallec, Yann. (2006). The Impact of Solvency II on the European Insurance Market. Reactions Supplement (Standard & Poors). Credit Fac. p. 52-54, No. 09535640 Supplement, Vol. 26.
  • Linder, Ulf & Ronkainen, Vesa. (2004). Solvency II - towards a new insurance supervisory system in the EU. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 6, 462 — 474.
  • Lozano Aragüés, Ricardo. (2005). Las implicaciones de Solvencia II en el sector asegurador español. Estabilidad financiera nº. 9. pp. 59-70.
  • Moreno, R.; Trigo, E.; Gómez, O.; De La Peña, J.I.; Iturricastillo, J.I. y Pozuelo, E. (2011). La idiosincrasia del Actuario. Anales del Instituto de Actuarios Españoles, 17, pp. 123-134.
  • Pfeifer, Dietmar And Strassburger, Doreen. (2008). Solvency II: stability problems with the SCR aggregation formula. Scandinavian Actuarial Journa: 1, 61 -77.
  • Pilán Canorea, Ovidio. (2005). Reforma del Control de la Solvencia de la Empresa de Seguros en la UE: Solvencia II. Programa de Doctorado en Economía Financiera, Actuarial y Matemática. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Pozuelo De Gracia, Emiliano. (2007). El Fair Value de las Provisiones Técnicas de Seguros de Vida. Instituto de Ciencias del Seguro. Fundación Mapfre.
  • Pozuelo De Gracia, Emiliano. (2008). Solvencia II: Capital Económico en Aseguradoras. Revista de Economía financiera: nº.16 3º cuatrimestre.
  • Sandström, Arne. (2007). Solvency – a historical review and some pragmatic solutions. Bulletin Swiss Association of Actuaries, nº1, p.11-33.
  • Stein, Robert W. (2006). Are you ready for Solvency II? Bests review, Vol. 106 Issue 11, p. 88.
  • Tarantino, Anthony. (2005). Globalization efforts to improve internal controls. Accounting Today Vol.19, No. 11, p. 37.
  • Trevor, Thomas. (2006). European insurers move to meet Solvency II demands. National underwriter, Life& Health, p. 34.
  • UNESPA. (2006). Solvencia II: más cerca de lo que parece. Jornada internacional. Madrid.
  • Vaughan, Therese M. (2009). The Implications of Solvency II for U.S. Insurance Regulation. Networks Financial Institute Policy Brief: No. 2009-PB-03
Datuen iturria: Dialnet