Economía experimental y del comportamiento

  1. Brañas-Garza, Pablo
  2. Espinosa Alejos, María Paz
Revista:
Papeles del psicólogo

ISSN: 0214-7823,  1886-1415

Año de publicación: 2011

Título del ejemplar: Evaluación de Tests editados en España

Volumen: 32

Número: 2

Páginas: 185-193

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles del psicólogo

Resumen

A diferencia de la Psicología, la Economía no comenzó a experimentar hasta fechas muy recientes. Aprovechando las principales ventajas de la experimentación (la replicabilidad y el control) la Economía ha sido capaz de contrastar las teorías existentes y de aportar nueva evidencia que nos ha servido para desarrollar nuevos modelos de comportamiento humano. Este artículo hace un esbozo del origen y de lo que es en la actualidad la Economía Experimental y la Economía del Comportamiento. Además se presenta un repaso detallado de dos temas que han sido objeto de investigación en nuestro país, intentando resaltar aquellos desarrollos que guardan una mayor relación con la psicología: lo modelos de jerarquías cognitivas y las preferencias sociales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akerlof, G. & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715-753.
  • Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & Miller, L. (2010). Personal identity. A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3), 261-275.
  • Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P. & Miller, L. M. (2008). Moral Distance in Dictator games. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 344-354.
  • Andersen, S., Harrison, G. H., Lau, M. I. & Rutström, E. (2010). Behavioral Econometrics for Psychologists, Journal of Economic Psychology 31(4), 553-576.
  • Ballester, C. & Hernández, P. (2011). Bounded Rationality. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Bardsley, N., Cubitt, R., Loomes, G., Moffatt, P., Starmer, C. & Sugden, R. (2010). Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness, An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Boston: Brandford Books, MIT Press.
  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142.
  • Binmore, K. & Shaked, A. (2010). Experimental economics: Where next?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 73, 87–100.
  • Bolton, G. & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. American Economic Review 90, 166-193.
  • Bosch-Domènech, A., Nagel, R., Satorra & J. GarcíaMontalvo (2002). One, Two, (Three), Infinity: A Comparison of Behavior of Newspaper Readers, Game Theorists and Students in Beauty-Contest Experiments. American Economic Review 92(5), 1687-1701.
  • Brandts, J. & Fatas, E. (2011). The puzzle of Social Preferences. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Brandts, J. (2009). La Economía Experimental y la Economía del Comportamiento. En J. C. García-Bermejo (Ed.), Sobre la Economía y sus Métodos (pp. 125-142). Madrid: Trotta.
  • Brandts, J. & Charness, G. (2000). Hot vs. Cold: Sequential Responses and Preference Stability in Experimental Games. Experimental Economics 2(3), 227-238.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovarik, J. & Ponti, G. (2011a). Degree heterogeneity and prosocial norms in social networks. mimeo.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & Repolles, M. (2011b). Time discounting and pain anticipation: Experimental evidence. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Brañas-Garza, P. & Georgantzís, N. (2011c). Experimental and behavioral economics: Theory, tools and topics. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Espinosa, M. P., Jiménez, N., Kovarik, J. & Ponti, G. (2010). Altruism and Social Integration. Games & Economic Behavior 69(2), 249-257.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Duran, M. & Espinosa, M.P. (2009a). The role of personal involvement and responsalibility in unfair decision: a classroom investigation. Rationality & Society 21(2), 225-248.
  • Brañas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P. & García, T. (2009b). Expectativas sobre comportamiento egoísta. Cuadernos Económicos del ICE 77, 33-43.
  • Brañas-Garza, P. (2007). Promoting generous behavior with framing in Dictator games. Journal of Economic Psychology 28(4): 477-486.
  • Brañas-Garza, P. (2006). Poverty in Dictator Games: Awakening Solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(3), 306-320.
  • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments on Strategic Interaction. Princenton, NJ: Princenton University Press.
  • Camerer, C. & Weber, R. (2006). Behavioral Experiments in Economics. Experimental Economics 9, 187-192.
  • Camerer, C. & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature XLIII, 9–64.
  • Camerer, C., Ho, T.K. & Chong, J. K. (2004). A Cognitive Hierarchy Theory of One-shot Games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), 861-898.
  • Coricelli, G. & Nagel, R. (2011). The neural basis of bounded rational behavior. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Coricelli, G. & Nagel, R. (2009). Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(23), 9163-9168.
  • Crawford, V. P. & Iriberri, N. (2007). Level-k Auctions: Can a Non-Equilibrium Model of Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions? Econometrica 75(6), 1721-1770.
  • Croson, R. & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2), 1-27.
  • Cutler, D. & Glaeser, E. (2005). What Explains Differences in Smoking, Drinking and Other Health-Related Behaviors?. American Economic Review 95(2), 238-242.
  • Chamberlin, E. H. (1948). An Experimental Imperfect Market. Journal of Political Economy 56(2): 95-108
  • Charness, G. & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises & Partnership. Econometrica 74, 1579-1601.
  • Charness, G. & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817-869.
  • Dana, J., Weber, R. A., Kuang, J. X. (2007). Exploiting Moral Wiggle Room: Experiments Demonstrating an Illusory Preference for Fairness. Economic Theory 33(1), 67–80.
  • Davis, D. & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental Economics. Princenton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ergun, S., García-Muñoz, T. & M. F. Rivas (2011). Gender Differences in Economic Experiments. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Espinosa, M. P., Kovárík, J. & Ponti, G. (2011). Strategic Interaction and Conventions. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 817-868.
  • Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G. & Riedl, A. (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets, European Economic Review 42(1), 1–34.
  • Fiore, S. M., Harrison, G. W., Hughes, C. E.& Rutström, E. (2009). Virtual Experiments and Environmental Policy. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 57(1), 65-86.
  • Friedman, D. & Sunder, S. (1994). Experimental Methods. A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fréchette, G. & Schotter, A. (2010). The Methods of Modern Experimental Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • García-Gallego, A., Georgantzís, N., Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. & M. Parravano (2011). The lottery-panel task for bi-dimensional parameter-free elicitation of risk attitudes. Revista Internacional de Sociología, en prensa.
  • Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C., Poldrack, R.A. & Fehr, E. (2008). Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. NY: Academic Press.
  • Gneezy, U., Niederle, M. & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1049-1074.
  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 367-388.
  • Harrison, G. W. & Rutström, E. (2008). Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Experiments. En C.R. Plott and V.L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results I (pp. 752-767). New York: Elsevier.
  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Gintis, H., McElreath, R. & Fehr, E. (2001). In search of Homo economicus: Experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91(2): 73–79.
  • Kagel, J. y A. Roth (Eds.) (1995). The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kanheman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263 292.
  • Laibson, D. (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 62, 443-478.
  • Loewenstein, G. (1999). Experimental Economics from the vantage-point of Behavioral Economics. The Economic Journal 109, 25-34.
  • May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, Utility and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns. Econometrica 22, 1-13.
  • Miller L. M. (2006). The Double Nature of Conventions - An Experimental Analysis. Papers on Strategic Interaction 2006-07, Max Planck Institute of Economics Jena.
  • Miller L. M. (2008). Two notions of conventions: an experimental analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics 4 (3), 327-349.
  • Nagel, R. (1995). Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study. American Economic Review 85(5), 1313-1326.
  • Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness Into Economics and Game Theory. American Economic Review 83, 1281-1302.
  • Rey-Biel, P. (2008). Economía Experimental y Teoría de Juegos. En F. Aguiar, J. Barragan y N. Lara (Eds.). Economía, Sociedad y Teoría de Juegos (pp. 137-152). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rojo, D. (2010). On the content of focal points. CBESS working paper 10.16, University of East Anglia.
  • Selten, R. (1978). The equity principle in economic behavior. En: Gottinger, H., Leinfellner, W. (Eds.). Decision Theory and Social Ethics, Issues in Social Choice (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Sauermann, H. & Selten, R. (1959). Ein Oligopolexperiment. Z. ges. Staatswissen 115, 427-471.
  • Smith, V. L. (1964). Experimental Auction Markets and the Walrasian Hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 73, 181-201.
  • Smith, V. L. (1962). An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70, 111-137.
  • Schelling, T. (1963). The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Tucker, A. W. (1950). A Two-Person Dilemma. Stanford University Working Paper (also published as (1980). On Jargon: The Prisoner’s Dilemma. UMSP Journal 1, 101).
  • Vega, F. (2007). Complex Social Networks. Econometric Society Monograph Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, R. A. & Dawes, R. (2005). Behavioral Economics. En: N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.) Handbook of Economic Sociology (pp. 90-108). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet