Goi-datiboak eta are goragokoak esukarazjabe datiboak eta datibo hunkituak vs. datibo etikoak

  1. Fernández Fernández, Beatriz
Revista:
Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

ISSN: 1577-9424

Año de publicación: 2010

Volumen: 10

Número: 1-2

Páginas: 1-20

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

Resumen

In this paper, we will explore the syntactic behavior of Basque possessor datives and compare them to the ethical ones. To that end, we'll review Borer & Grodzinsky's (1986) classical syntactic tests and show that Basque possessor da ti ves behave similarly to their counterparts in other languages, as Hebrew (also Landau 1999), Spanish and French (louitteau & Rezac 2007), among many others. As we will see, dative possessors are high datives (against pylkkanen 2002/2008), although they are not necessarily merged high. Besides, even higher in the architecture of the sentence are ethical datives (laeggli 1982, 1986 among others) and also allocutives (Oihartzabal 1993). Although possessor datives will be the main issue to address, we will also focus on other non-core (high) da ti ves, as affected ones, which behave similarly to possessors and probably occupy the same (high) position in the structure.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albizu, Pablo (2009), «Construcciones inacusativas con dativos posesivos y dativos de interés en vasco: un análisis derivacionalista». Seminario de Lingüística teórica. Madrid: CSIC.
  • Albizu, Pablo (2011), «Microvariación en las construcciones inacusativas de dativo posesivo del euskera». Wedisyn’s Second Workshop on Syntactic Variation. Universitat de Barcelona. Otsailak 17-18.
  • Albizu, Pablo & Susana Huidobro (2011), «Ethical datives in Basque». Eskuizkribua, UPV/EHU & Stony Brook.
  • Aresti, Gabriel (1972), «Flexiones verbales empleadas por Leizarraga de Briscous, en sus traducciones vascas de 1571». FLV IV-11: 157-194.
  • Arregi, Eurídice (2003), «On possessor raising effects in Basque». Eskuizkribua, UPV/EHU.
  • Boneh, Nora & Léa Nash (2010a), «A higher applicative: evidence from French». In Proceedings of IATL 25, http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/25/Boneh_Nash.pdf
  • Boneh, Nora & Léa Nash (2010b), «Core and non-core datives in French». In B. Fernández & R. Etxepare (arg.), Variation in datives: a micro-comparative perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Borer, Hagit & Yosef Grodzinsky (1986), «Syntactic Cliticization and Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics». In Hagit Borer (arg.), Syntax and Semantics 19. New York: Accademic Press, 175-215.
  • Cuervo, M. Cristina (2003), Datives at large. Ph.D. diss. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
  • Deustuko Hizkuntzalaritza Mintegia (1989), «Inkorporazioa perpaus kausatiboetan». In P. Salaburu (arg.), Sintaxi teoria eta euskara. Bilbo: UPV/EHU, 87-119 or.
  • E­txepare, Ricardo (2010), «Contact and change in a Minimalist Theory of variation». Linguistic variation in the Minimalist framework. UAB, urtarrilak, 14 eta 15.
  • E­txepare, Ricardo & Beñat Oihartzabal (2008), «Bi datibo egitura ifar-ekialdeko zenbait hizkeratan». Agertzear: Lapurdum, Baiona.
  • E­txepare, Ricardo & Beñat Oihartzabal (2010), «Datives and adpositions in North-Eastern Basque». In Beatriz Fernández & Ricardo Etxepare (arg.), Variation in datives: a micro-comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.
  • Fernández, Beatriz (2011a), «Evidencia dialectal y pan-dialectal a favor de la distinción entre dativos altos y bajos». Wedisyn’s Second Workshop on Syntactic Variation. Universitat de Barcelona. Otsailak 17-18.
  • Fernández, Beatriz (2011b), «High and low. The Basque cartography of datives and the Dative/Agreement Constraint». Eskuizkribua, UPV/EHU.
  • Fernández, Beatriz (2011c), «Goi- eta behe-datiboak eta Datibo-Komunztaduraren Murriztapena: Ipar-ekialdeko hizkeren lekukotasunak eta beste». In Koldo Zuazo & Irantzu Epelde (arg.), Euskalkien jatorria eta bilakaera. ASJU.[prestatzen]
  • Fernández, Beatriz & Pablo Albizu (2006), «Agreement doubling in Basque dialects: identical and non-identical twins». Syntactic Doubling Conference. Amsterdam, martxoak 15-18.
  • Fernández, Beatriz & Josu Landa (2008), «Datibo komunztadura beti zaindu, inoiz zaindu ez eta batzuetan baino zaintzen ez denean. Hiru ahoko aldagaia, datu iturri bi, eta erreminta bat: Corsintax». Agertzear: Lapurdum, Baiona.
  • Fernández, Beatriz & Jon Ortiz de Urbina (2010), Datiboa hiztegian. Bilbo: UPV/EHU.
  • Fernández, Beatriz, Jon Ortiz de Urbina & Josu Landa (2010), «Komunztadurarik gabeko datiboen gakoez». In Ricardo Gómez & Joseba A. Lakarra (arg.), Beñat Oihartzabali gorazarre. Bilbo & Donostia: UPV/EHU & Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia ASJU XLIII: 1-2, 357-380.
  • Haspelmath, Martin (1999), «External possession in European areal perspective». In D.L. Payne & I. Barshi (arg.), External possession, Typological Studies in Language, 39. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 109-132 or.
  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. (1982), Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. (1986), «Three issues in the theory of clitics: case, doubled NPs and extraction». In Hagit Borer (arg.), Syntax and Semantics 19. New York: Accademic Press, 15-42 or.
  • Jouitteau, Mélanie & Milan Rezac (2007), «The French ethical dative, 13 syntactic tests». Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, IX (1): 97-108.
  • Landau, Idan (1999), «Possessor raising and the structure of VP». Lingua 107: 1-103.
  • Oihartzabal, Beñat (1993), «Verb agreement with non-arguments: On allocutive agreement». In J.I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (arg.), Generative studies in Basque linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 89-114 or.
  • Oihartzabal, Beñat (2007a), «Argument Structure Building: Applicative Heads in Basque». Workshop on Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations, 2007/05/23-25, IKER, CNRS.
  • Oihartzabal, Beñat (2007b), Basque ditransitives. Eskuizkribua, IKER, CNRS.
  • Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi (1999), «External possession: what, where, how, and why». In D.L. Payne & I. Barshi (arg.), External possession, Typological Studies in Language, 39. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3-29 or.
  • Perlmutter, David (1971), Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
  • Pylkkänen, Liina (2002/2008), Introducing arguments. Cambridge/London: the MIT Press.
  • Roberge, Yves & Michelle Troberg (2009), «The high applicative syntax of the dativus commodi/incommodi in Romance». Probus 21: 249-289.
  • Yrizar, Pedro de, (2002), Morfología del verbo auxiliar suletino. Bilbo: Euskaltzaindia.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet