El 'Zejas' y la 'niña de Rajoy'. Análisis sobre el papel del humor en las elecciones generales españolas de 2008

Referencias bibliográficas

• Attardo, Salvatore, Hempelmann, Christian F. y Di Maio, Sara 2002. “Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions”, Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 15: 3-46.
• Baum, Matthew A. 2005. “Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit”, American Journal of Political Science, 49: 213-234.
• Berger, Peter 1997. Redeeming Laughter. The Comic Dimension of Human Experience. Berlín, Nueva York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Bergson, Henry 1900 [1973]. La risa: ensayo sobre la significación de lo cómico. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
• Berinsky, Adam 2005. Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Billig, Michael 2005. Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. Londres: Sage.
• Carmines, Edward G. y Huckfeldt, Robert 1996 [2001]. “Comportamiento político: una visión general”, en R. E. Goodin y H. D. Klingemann (eds.), Nuevo manual de Ciencia Política. Madrid: Istmo: 329-373.
• Chafe, Wallace 2007. The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling Behind Laughter and Humor. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Critchley, Simon 2002. On Humour. Nueva York: Routledge.
• Davies, Christie, Kuipers, Giselinde, Lewis, Paul, Martin, Rod. A., Oring, Ellliot y Raskin, Viktor 2008. “The Muhammad cartoons and humour research: A Collection of essays”, Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 21: 1-46.
• Davis, Richard, Owen, Diana, Taras, David y Ward, Stephen (coords.) 2008. Making a Difference: A Comparative View of the Role of the Internet in Election Politics. Londres: Lexington Books.
• Del Águila, Rafael 2000. La senda del mal. Razón de Estado y razón política. Madrid: Taurus.
• Del Águila, Rafael 2004. Sócrates furioso. El pensador y la ciudad. Barcelona: Anagrama. Del Águila, Rafael y Chaparro, Sandra 2006. La República de Maquiavelo. Madrid: Tecnos.
• Ekman, Paul y Rosenberg, Erika (eds.) 2005. What the Face Reveals. Basic and Applied Studies on Spontaneous Expression Using the Facial Action Coding System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fairclough, Norman 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Forabosco, Giovannantonio 1992. “Cognitive Aspects of the Humour Process: The Concept of Incongruity”, Humour. International Journal of Humour Research, 5: 45-68.
• Franklin, Mark N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gilens, Martin, Vavreck, Lynn y Cohen, Martin 2007. “The Mass Media and the Public’s Assessments of Presidential Candidates, 1952-2000”, The Journal of Politics, 69: 1160-1175.
• Hindman, Matthew 2005. “The Real Lessons of Howard Dean: Reflections on the First Digital Campaign”, Perspectives on Politics, 3: 121-128.
• Iyengar, Shanto 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Johnson, Martin, Shively, Phillips y Stein, Robert 2002. “Contextual Data and the Study of Elections and Voting Behavior: Connecting Individuals to Environments”, Electoral Studies, 21: 219-233.
• Lledó, Pablo 2001. “La influencia de los debates electorales sobre la decisión de voto: el caso de mayo de 1993 en España”, Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 5: 143-170.
• Lockyer, Sharon y Pickering, Michael J. (eds.) 2005. Beyond a Joke. The Limits of Humour. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.
• Lord, Carnes 2003. The Modern Prince. What Leaders Need to Know Now. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Lucero, Ernesto 2007. “Usos y variaciones del nombre propio como estrategia política. De ‘Zapatero’ a ‘Zetapé’ en el discurso político de Jiménez Losantos”, Discurso & Sociedad, 1: 439-481.
• Meisel, Joseph S. 1999. “The Importance of Being Serious: The Unexplored Connection between Gladstone and Humour”, History, 84: 278-300.
• Morreall, John 1989. “Enjoying Incongruity”, Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 2: 1-18.
• Mulkay, Michael J. 1988. On Humour: It’s Nature and It’s Place in Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Norrick, Neal R. 2000. Conversational Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
• Norris, Pippa 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Núñez, Antonio 2007. ¡Será mejor que lo cuentes! Los relatos como herramientas de comunicación (Storytelling). Ed. Empresa-Activa.
• Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Ruch, Willibald y Ekman, Paul 2001. “The expressive pattern of laughter”, en A. W. Kaszniak (ed.), Emotion, qualia, and consciousness. Tokyo: Word Scientific Publisher, 426-443.
• Salmon, Christian 2008. Storytelling. La máquina de fabricar historias y formatear las mentes. Barcelona: Península.
• Shifman, Limor, Coleman, Stephen y Ward, Stephen 2007. “Only joking? Online humour in the 2005 UK general election”, Information, Communication and Society, 10: 465-487.
• Sloterdijk, Peter 1983 [2003]. Crítica de la razón cínica. Madrid: Siruela.
• Sloterdijk, Peter 2003. Experimentos con uno mismo. Una conversación con Carlos Oliveira. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
• Sloterdijk, Peter 2004 [2006]. Esferas. Volumen III. Espumas: Esferología plural. Madrid: Siruela.
• Staley, Rosemary y Derks, Peter 1995. “Structural Incongruity and Humour Appreciation”, Humour. International Journal of Humour Research, 8: 97-134.
• Veale, Tony 2004. “Incongruity in humour: Root cause or epiphenomenon?”, Humor. International Journal of Humor Research, 17: 419-428.
• Viroli, Maurizio 2002 [2005]. La sonrisa de Maquiavelo. Barcelona: Tusquets.
• Wagg, Stephen 1996. “Everything else is propaganda: the politics of alternative comedy”, en G. Paton, Ch. Powell y S. Wagg (eds.), The Social Faces of Humour: Practices and Issues. Hants y Vermont: Ashgate Publishing: 321-347.
• Weber, Max 1922 [1993]. Economía y sociedad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
• Zizek, Slavoj 1989 [1992]. El sublime objeto de la ideología. Madrid: Siglo XXI.