Gobernanza, procesos participativos y conflictos en los Espacios Naturales Protegidos de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Referencias bibliográficas

• ABELSON, J. Y GAUVIN, F. (2006): «Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, Evidence and. Policy Implications», Canadian Policy Research Networks, Otawa
• BANVILLE, C., LANDRY, M., MARTEL, J.M. Y BOULAIRE, C. (1998): «A stakeholder approach to MCDA», Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 15(1): 15-32.
• BERGSENG, E. Y VATN, A. (2009): «Why protection of biodiversity creates conflict Some evidence from the Nordic countries», Journal of Forest Economics, 15: 147-165.
• BLOOMFIELD, D., COLLINS, K.. FRY, C. Y MUNTON, R. (2001): «Deliberation and inclusion: vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance?», Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19: 501-513.
• BOARD ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1999): Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
• BRUGNACH, M., DEWULF, A., PAHL-WOSTL, C. Y TAILLIEU, T. (2008): «Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: about knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know», Ecology and Society, 13(2): 30.
• BRUN, A. (2006): «Les objectifs, principes et éléments de débat», en Brun, A. y Lasserre, F. (dir.), Politiques de l’eau. Grands principes et réalités locales, Presses de l’Université du Québec, 1-14, Québec.
• CADIÑANOS, J.A. Y LOZANO, P. (2006): «Valoración biogeográfica de los bosques de la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai (Vizcaya)», Actas del III Congreso Español de Biogeografía, Gernika.
• CADIÑANOS, J.A. Y MEAZA, G. (1998): Bases para una Biogeografía aplicada. Criterios y sistemas de valoración de la vegetación, 145 pp., Geoforma ediciones, Logroño.
• CIANI, A., BOGGIA, A. Y MARINOZZI, G. (1993): «Metodologie di valutazione di alternative di parchi: il caso del Parco del Nera», Genio Rurale, 11: 46-54.
• COMISIÓN EUROPEA (2001): European governance: A white paper. COM(2001) 428 final, Bruselas.
• DE MARCHI, B., FUNTOWICZ, S.O., LO CASCIO, S. Y MUNDA, G. (2000): «Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily», Ecological Economics, 34: 267-282.
• DOUGIL, A.J., FRASER, E.D.G., HOLDEN, J., HUBACEK, K., PRELL, C., REED, M.S., STAGL, S. Y STRINGER, L.C. (2006): «Learning from doing participatory rural research: Lessons from the Peak District National Park», Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(2): 259-275.
• FIORINO, D. (1990): «Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanism», Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15: 226-43.
• FOLKE, C., HAHN, T., OLSSON, P. Y NORBERG, J. (2005): «Adaptive governance of social-ecological system», Annual Review of Environmental and Resources, 30: 441-473.
• FUNTOWICZ, S.O., MARTÍNEZ-ALÍER, J., MUNDA, G. Y RAVETZ, J. (2002): «Multicriteria-based environmental policy», en Abaza, H. y Branzini, A. (eds.), Implementing sustainable development. Integrated assessment and participatory decision-making processes, PNUMA, Edward Elgar, Glos.
• FUNTOWICZ, S.O. Y RAVETZ, J. (1990): Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
• FUNTOWICZ, S.O. Y RAVETZ, J. 1994: «Emergent complex systems», Futures, 26: 568-582.
• FUNTOWICZ, S.O. Y RAVETZ, J. 1999: «Post-Normal Science and insight now maturing», Futures, 31: 641-646.
• GAMBOA, G. (2006): «Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysen region, Chile», Ecological Economics, 59: 157-170.
• GAMBOA, G. Y MUNDA, G. (2007): «The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework», Energy Policy, 35: 1564-1583.
• GARMENDIA, E., GAMBOA, G., FRANCO, J., GARMENDIA, J., LIRIA, P. Y OLAZABAL, M. (2010): «Social multi-criteria evaluation as a decision support tool for integrated coastal zone management», Ocean and Coastal Management: forthcoming.
• GARMENDIA, E. Y STAGL, S. (2010): «Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe», Ecological Economics: forthcoming.
• GIAMPIETRO, M., MAYUMI, K. Y MUNDA, G. (2006): «Integrated assessment and energy analysis: Quality assurance in multi-criteria analysis of sustainability», Energy, 31: 59-86.
• GUIMARÃES-PEREIRA, A., GUEDES, S. Y TOGNETTI, S. (2006): Interfaces Between Science and Society, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield.
• HARREMOËS, P., GEE, D., MACGARVIN, M., STIRLING, A., KETS, J., WYNNE, B. Y GUEDES VAZ, S. (2001): Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000, Agencia Europea de Medio Ambiente, Copenhague.
• HJORTSØ, C.N., STRÆDE, S. Y HELLEN, F. (2006): «Applying multri-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: A case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal», Journal of Forest Economics, 12: 91-108.
• KASEMIR, B., GARDNER, M., JÄEGER, J. Y JAEGER, C (eds.) (2003): Public Participation in Sustainability Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• KROTT, M., JULIEN, B., LAMMERTZ, M., BARBIER, J-M., JEN, S., BALLESTEROS, M. Y DE BOVIS, C. (2000): «Voicing Interests and Concerns. Natura 2000: An ecological network in conflict with people», Forest Policy and Economics, 1: 357-366.
• LAIRD, F. (1993): «Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making», Science, Technology & Human Values, 18: 341-361.
• MCCAULEY, D. (2008): «Sustainable development and the “Governance challenge”: the French experience with Natura 2000», European Environment, 18: 152-167.
• MESSNER, F., ZWIRNER, O. Y KARKUSCHKE, M. (2006): «Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River basin», Land Use Policy, 23: 63-75.
• MUNDA, G. (2004): «Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences», European Journal of Operational Research, 158: 662-677.
• MUNDA, G. 2005: «“Measuring sustainability”: A multi-criterion framework», Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7: 117-134.
• MUNDA, G. 2006: «Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for urban sustainability policies», Land Use Policy, 23: 86-94.
• MUNDA, G. 2008: Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a sustainable economy, Springer, Verlag-BerlinHeidelberg.
• NAJAM, A., PAPA, M. Y TAIYAB, N. (2006): Global environmental governance: A reform agenda, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
• NIEMELÄ, J., YOUNG, J., ALARD, D., ASKASIBAR, M., HENLE, K., JOHNSON, R., KURTTILA, M., LARSSON, T-B.; MATOUCH, S., NOWICKI, P., PAIVA, R., PORTOGHESI, L., SMULDERS, R., STEVENSON, A., TARTES, U. Y WATT, A. (2005): «Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe», Forest Policy and Economics, 7: 877-890.
• NIJKAMP, P., RIETVELD, P. Y VOOGD, H. (1990): Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical planning, Elsevier, Amsterdan.
• NUNES, P.A.L.D., VAN DEN BERGH, J.C.J.M. Y NIJKAMP, P. (2003): The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity. Methods and Policy Applications, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
• O’CONNOR, M., FAUXCHEUX, S., FORGER, G., FUNTOWICZ, S. Y MUNDA, G. (1996): «Emergent Com- plexity and Procedural Rationality: Post-Normal Science for Sustainability», en Costanza, R., Segura, O. y Martinez-Alier, J. (eds.), Getting Down to Earth Practical Applications of Ecological Economics, Island Press, Washington, D.C.; Covelo, CA.
• O’RIORDAN, T. (2002): «Protecting beyond the protected», en O’Riordan, T. y Stoll-Kleemann, S. (eds.), Biodiversity, sustainability and human communities: Protecting beyond the protected, Cambridge University Press, 3-29, Cambridge.
• PAAVOLA, J. (2004): «Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union’s Habitats Directive», Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 1(1): 59-77.
• PAAVOLA, J. 2007: «Institutions and environmental governance: A reconceptualization», Ecological Economics, 63: 93-103.
• PAAVOLA, J. Y ADGER, W.N. (2005): «Institutional ecological economics», Ecological Economics, 53: 353-368.
• PAAVOLA, J., GOULDSON, A. Y KLUVÁNKOVÁ-ORAVSKÁ, T. (2009): «Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity», Environmental Policy and Governance, 19: 148- 158.
• PAHL-WOSTL, C., CRAPS, M., DEWULF, A., MOSTERT, E., TABARA, D. Y TAILLIEU, T. (2007): «Social learning and water resource management», Ecology and Society, 12(2): 5.
• PARSON, E.A. Y CLARK, W.C. (1991): «Sustainable development as social learning: Theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program», en Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. y Light, S.S. (eds): Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, Columbia University Press, New York.
• PROCTOR, W. Y DRECHSLER, M. (2006): «Deliberative multicriteria evaluation», Environmental and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24: 169-190.
• RAUSCHMAYER, F., PAAVOLA, J. Y WITTMER, H. (2009): «European governance of natural resources and participation in a multi-level context: an editorial», Environmental Policy and Governance, 19: 141-147.
• RAUSCHMAYER, F. Y WITTMER, H. (2006): «Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts«, Land Use Policy, 23: 108-122.
• REED, M.S. (2008): «Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review», Biological Conservation, 141: 2417-2431.
• ROCA, E., GAMBOA, G. Y TÀBARA, D. (2008): «Assessing the multimensionality of coastal erosion risks. Public participation and multicriteria analysis (MCA) in a Mediterranean coastal system», Risk Analysis, 28(2): 399-412.
• RODELA, R. Y UDOč, A. (2008): «Participation in nature protection: Does it benefit the local community? A Triglav National Park case study», International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4: 209-218.
• RUSSI, D. (2007): Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Renewable Energy Policies: Two case-studies, Tesis Doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona.
• SCHUSLER, M., DECKER, D. Y PFEFFER, M. (2003): «Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management», Society and Natural Resources, 15: 309-326.
• SMITH, P.G.R. Y THEBERGE, J.B. (1987): «Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: Theory and practice», Environmental Management, 11(4): 447-460.
• SOCIAL LEARNING GROUP (2001): «Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks», Volume 2. A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; London.
• STIGLITZ, J.E. (2002): «New Perspectives on public f inance: Recent achievements and future challenges», Journal of Public Economics, 86: 341-360.
• STIRLING, A. (2006): «Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis», Land Use Policy, 23: 95-107.
• STRIEGNITZ, M. (2006): «Conflicts over coastal protection in a National Park: Mediation and negotiated law making», Land Use Policy, 23: 26-33.
• STRIJKER, D., SIJTSMA, F.J. Y WIERSMA, D. (2000): «Evaluation of nature conservation: An application to the Dutch Ecological Network», Environmental and Resource Economics, 16: 363-378.
• VAN DEN HOVE, S. (2006): «Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches», Land Use Policy, 23: 10-17.
• VAN PELT, M., KUYVENHOVEN, A. Y NIJKAMP, P. (1990): «Project appraisal and sustainability: the applicability of cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis», Wageningen Economic Papers, 5, Wageningen.
• VISSER, M., MORAN, J., REGAN, E., GORMALLY, M. Y SKEFFINGTON, M.S. (2007): «The Irish agri-environment: How turlough users and non-users view converging EU agendas of Natura 2000 and CAP», Land Use Policy, 24: 362-373.
• WEBLER, T., KASTENHOLZ, H. Y RENN, O. (1995): «Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective», Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15: 443-463.
• WEBLER, T., TULER, S. Y KRUEGER, R. (2001): «What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public·, Environmental Management, Vol. 27(3): 435-450.
• WEBLER, T., TULER, S. Y TANGUAY, J. (2004): «Competing perspectives on public participation in National Park Service Planning: The Boston Harbour Islands National Park Area», Journal of Park Service and Recreation Administration, Vol. 22 (3): 91-113.
• WEBLER, T. Y TULER, S. (2006): «Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making», Policy Studies Journal 34: 699-722.
• WITTMER, H., RAUSCHMAYER, F. Y KLAUER, B. (2006): «How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?», Land Use Policy, 23: 1-9.
• WYNNE, B. (1992): «Uncertainty and environmental learning Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm», Global Environmental Change, 2(2): 111-127.