Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs

Referencias bibliográficas

• Allen, M., & Preiss, R. (1993). Replication and meta-analysis: A necessary connection. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(6), 9-20.
• Abelson, R.P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Bakan, D. (1966). The tests of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
• Balluerka, N., Gómez, J., & Hidalgo, M.D. (2005). The controversy over null hypothesis significance testing revisited. METHODOLOGY. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(2), 55-70.
• Baril, G.L., & Cannon, J.T. (1995). What is the probability that null hypothesis testing is meaningless? American Psychologist, 50, 1098- 1099.
• Binder, A. (1963). Further considerations on testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological Review, 70, 107-115.
• Bracey, G.W. (1991). Sense, non-sense and statistics. PhiDelta Kappan, 73, 335.
• Branstätter, E. (1999). Confidence intervals as an alternative to significance testing. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 4(2), 33-46.
• Carver, R.P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48(3), 378-399.
• Carver, R.P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
• Chase, L.J., & Chase, R.B. (1976). A statistical power analysis of applied psychological research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 234-237.
• Chow, S.L. (1987). Experimental psychology: Rationale, procedures and issues. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Detselig Enterprises.
• Chow, S.L. (1988). Significance test or effect size? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 105-110.
• Chow, S.L. (1989). Significance tests and deduction: Reply to Folger (1989). Psychological Bulletin, 106, 161-165.
• Chow, S.L. (1991). Some reservations about power analysis. American Psychologist, 46, 1088-1089.
• Chow, S.L. (1996). Statistical significance: Rationale, validity and utility. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.
• Chow, S.L. (1998a). Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity and utility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 169-239.
• Chow, S.L. (1998b). What statistical significance means. Theory and Psychology, 8, 323-330.
• Clark-Carter, D. (1997). The account taken of statistical power in research published in the British Journal of Psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 71-83.
• Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304-1312.
• Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
• Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
• Cortina, J.M., & Dunlap, W.P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 161-172.
• Cowles, M., & Davis, C. (1982). On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance. American Psychologist, 37(5), 553-558.
• Cox, D.R. (1977). The role of significance tests. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 4, 49-70.
• Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, use and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 532-574.
• Dixon, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 390-396.
• Erwin, E. (1998). The logic of null hypothesis testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 197-198.
• Estes, W.K. (1997). On the communication of information by displays of standard errors and confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4(3), 330-341.
• Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C.W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: The amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory and Psychology, 5, 75-98.
• Fidler, F. (2002). The fifth edition of the APA publication manual: Why its statistics recommendations are so controversial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(5), 749-770.
• Fidler, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Computing correct confidence intervals for ANOVA fixed-and random-effects effect sizes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 575-604.
• Finch, S., Cumming, G., & Thomason, N. (2001). Reporting of statistical inference in the Journal of Applied Psychology: Little evidence of reform. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 181-210.
• Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
• Fisher, R.A. (1937). The design of experiments. London: Oliver & Boyd.
• Folger, R. (1989). Significance tests and the duplicity of binary decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 155-160.
• Frías, D., García, J.F., & Pascual, J. (1994). Estudio de la potencia de los trabajos publicados en Psicológica. Estimación del número de sujetos fijando alfa y beta. III Simposium de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales y del Comportamiento (pp. 1057-1063). Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
• Frick, R.W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 132-138.
• Frick, R.W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 379-390.
• Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
• Glass, G.V., McGraw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Grant, D.A. (1962). Testing the null hypothesis and the strategy and tactics of investigating theoretical models. Psychological review, 69, 54-61.
• Greenwald, A.G., González, R., Harris, R.J., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and pvalues: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
• Hagen, R.L. (1997). In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 52(1), 15-24.
• Harris, R.J. (1991). Significance tests are not enough: The role of effectsize estimation in theory corroboration. Theory and Psychology, 1, 375-382.
• Hays, W.L. (1963). Statistics for psychologists. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hubbard, R., & Armstrong, J.S. (1994). Replications and extensions in Marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 233-248.
• Hubbard, R., Parsa, A.R., & Luthy, M.R. (1997). The spread of statistical significance testing in psychology: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology, 1917-1994. Theory and Psychology, 7(4), 545-554.
• Hubbard, R., & Ryan, P.A. (2000). The historical growth of statistical significance testing in psychology and its future prospects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(5), 661-681.
• Huberty, C.J. (1987). On statistical testing. Educational Researcher, 16(8), 4-9.
• Huberty, C.J. (2002). A history of effect size indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 227-240.
• Hunter, J.E. (1997). Need: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3-7.
• Jeffrey, H. (1934). Probability and scientific method. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 146, 9-16.
• Johnson, D.H. (1999). The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 763-772.
• Kazdin, A.E., & Bass, D. (1989). Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 138-147.
• Kelley, T.L. (1935). An unbiased correlation ratio measure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 21, 554-559.
• Killeen, P. R. (2005). An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16(5), 345-353.
• Kirk, R.E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746-759.
• Kirk, R.E. (2001). Promoting good statistical practices: Some suggestions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 213-218.
• Lindsay, R.M., & Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. American Statistician, 47, 217-228.
• Loftus, G.R. (1991). On the tyranny of hypothesis testing in the social sciences. Contemporary Psychology, 36, 102-105.
• Loftus, G.R. (1995). Data analysis as insight: Reply to Morrison and Weaver. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 27, 57-59.
• Loftus, G.R. (1996). Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way to analyse data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 161-171.
• Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Meehl, P.E. (1990a). Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defence and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 108-141.
• Meehl, P.E. (1990b). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195-244.
• Meehl, P.E. (1991). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. In R.E. Snow & D.E. Wilet (Eds.): Improving inquiry in social science: A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach (pp. 13-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Meehl, P.E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik & J.H. Steiger (Eds.): What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 391-423). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Monterde, H., Pascual, J., & Frías, M.D. (2006). Errores de interpretación de los métodos estadísticos: importancia y recomendaciones. Psicothema, 18(4), 848-856.
• Murphy, K.R. (1990). If the null hypothesis is impossible, why test it? American Psychologist, 45(3), 403-404.
• Nickerson, R.S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of and old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 241-301.
• Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference: A commentary for social and behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.
• Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
• Pearson, K. (1905). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: XIV. On the general theory of skew correlations and nonlinear regression (Draper’s Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series II). London: Dulau.
• Pollard, P. (1993). How significant is «significance»? In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.): A handbook for data analysis in the behavioural sciences: Volume 1. Methodological issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Robinson, D., & Levin, J. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 21-26.
• Robinson, D.H., & Wainer, H. (2001). On the past and future of null hypothesis significance testing. Princeton: Statistics & Research Division.
• Rosenthal, R. (1983). Assessing the statistical and social importance of the effects of psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 4-13.
• Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
• Rossi, J.S. (1990). Statistical power of psychological research: What have we gained in 20 years? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5, 646-656.
• Rozeboom, W.W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416-428.
• Sánchez, J., Valera, A., Velandrino, A.P., & Marín, F. (1992). Un estudio de la potencia estadística en Anales de Psicología. Anales de Psicología, 8, 19-32.
• Schafer, W.D. (1993). Interpreting statistical significance and non-significance. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 383-387.
• Schmidt, F.L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 115-129.
• Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
• Serlin, R.C., & Lapsley, D.K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73-83.
• Serlin, R.C., & Lapsley, D.K. (1993). Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good-enough principle. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.): A handbook of data analysis in behavioural sciences: Volume 1. Methodological Issues (pp. 199-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Shaver, J. (1985). Chance and nonsense: A conversation about interpreting tests of statistical significance. PhiDelta Kappan, 67(1), 138-141.
• Shaver, J. (1993). What statistical significance testing is and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(4), 293-316.
• Smithson, M. (2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 305-632.
• Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
• Snow, R.E. (1998). Inductive strategy and statistical tactics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 219.
• Steiger, J.H., & Fouladi, R.T. (1997). Noncentral interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical models. In L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik & J.H. Steiger (Eds.): What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 221-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Thompson, B. (1992). Two and one-half decades of leadership in measurement and evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 434-438.
• Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
• Thompson, B. (2002). «Statistical», «practical» and «clinical»: How many kinds of significance do counsellors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64-71.
• Thompson, B., & Baugh, F. (2002). Using effect sizes, confidence intervals and especially confidence intervals for effect sizes: New APA and journal mandates for improved practices. Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, special number, 539-543.
• Tukey, J.W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science, 6, 100-116.
• Valera, A., Sánchez, J., & Marín, F. (2000). Contraste de hipótesis e investigación psicológica española: análisis y propuestas. Psicothema, 12(2), 549-552.
• Weitzman, R.A. (1984). Seven treacherous pitfalls of statistics, illustrated. Psychological Reports, 54(2), 355-363.
• Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.