Universal Grammar and the acquisition of English L3 syntax

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anderson, S. R. and D. W. Lightfoot. 2002. The Language Organ. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
• Berman, R. A. and D. I. Slobin. 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A CrossLinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Braidi, S. 1999. The Acquisition of Second Language Syntax. London: Arnold. Bley-Vroman, R. 1990. “The logical problem of foreign language learning”.
• Linguistic Analysis 20: 3-49. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT
• Press. ____. 1980. Rules and Representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. ____. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. ____. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government
• and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ____. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ____. 2000. “Minimalist enquiries: the framework”. In R. Martin, D.
• Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Clahsen, H. and P. Muysken. 1986. “The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners – A study of the acquisition of German word order”. Second Language Research 2: 93-119.
• Curtiss, S. 1988. “The special talent of grammar acquisition”. In L. Obler and D. Fein (eds.) The Exceptional Brain: Neuropsychology of Talent and Special Abilities. New. York: Guildford.
• DeKeyser, R. 2000. “The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 499-533.
• Flynn, S., C. Foley and I. Vinnitskaya. 2004. “The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults´ and children´s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses”. The International Journal of Multilingualism 1: 1-36.
• Fuller, J. and G. Gundel. 1987. “Topic prominence in interlanguage”. Language Learning 37: 1-18.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2003a. “Native vs. non-native strategies in rendering grammaticality judgments”. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 47: 183-199.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2003b. “Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgments in the acquisition of English as a foreign language”. In M.P. García Mayo and M. L. García Lecumberri (eds.) The Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language (94- 114). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2006. “Synthetic compounding in the English interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals”. International Journal of Multilingualism 3(4): 231- 257.
• García Mayo, M.P. and A. Lázaro Ibarrola. 2005. “Pronouns revisited: Evidence from the morphosyntactic development of English as an L3”. In F. Garrudo Carabias and J. Comesaña (eds.) Estudios de Filología Inglesa en honor de Antonio Garnica Silva (pp. 217-228). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
• García Mayo M.P, A. Lázaro Ibarrola and J. M. Liceras. 2001. “La forma is y los pronombres débiles como morfemas de concordancia en la interlengua inglesa de niños bilingües castellano/euskera”. In L.González Romero, M. Martínez Vázquez, B. Rodríguez Arrizabalaga and P. Ron Vaz (eds.) Recent Approaches to English Grammar. Huelva: Universidad de Huelva. 77-89.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2003. “Comodines is y he en el inglés/euskera-castellano”. In M. R. Pérez and I. Doval (eds.) Adquisición y Enseñanza de Lenguas, Bilingüismo y Traducción . Vigo: Universidade de Vigo. 117-123.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2005. “Placeholders in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children”. Language Learning 55(3): 445-489.
• García Mayo, M.P. 2006. “Agreement in the English interlanguage of Basque/Spanish bilinguals: A minimalist farewell to pro”. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics 151: 83-98.
• Gass, S. M. 2001. “Innovation in second language research methods”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 221-232.
• Gopnik, M. (ed.). 1997. The Inheritance and Innateness of Grammars. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gregg, K. 2003. “SLA theory: Construction and assessment”. En C. J. Doughty y M. H.
• Long (eds.) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell. 831-865.
• Gutierrez, J. and M.P. García Mayo. 2007. “Non-adult long-distance whquestions in non-native English”. En C. Pérez Vidal, M. Juan Garau and A. Bel i Gala (eds.) A Portrait of the Young in the New Multilingual Spain (in press).
• Hawkins, R. 2001. Second Language Syntax. A Generative Introduction. London: Blackwell.
• Herschensohn, J. 2000. The Second Time Around: Minimalism and L2 Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Ionin, T. and K. Wexler. 2002. “Why is ‘is’ easier that ‘-s’? Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English”. Second Language Research 18(2): 95-136.
• Jaeggli, O. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Kanno, K. 1998. “The stability of UG principles in second language acquisition: Evidence from Japanese”. Linguistics 36: 1125-1146.
• Kato, M.A. 1999. “Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter”. Probus 11: 1-27.
• Koster, L. 2005. Verb positioning in L3 German: Roles of the first and second languages. Unpublished M.A. dissertation. University of Essex.
• Lázaro Ibarrola, A. 2002. La adquisición de la morfosintaxis inglesa por niños bilingües euskera-castellano. Una perspectiva minimalista. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad del País Vasco.
• Lázaro Ibarrola, A. and M. P. García Mayo. 2006. “Is forma euskaragaztelera haur elebidunen ingelesezko tarteko hizkuntzan” (La forma is en la interlengua inglesa de niños bilingües euskera-castellano) In J. Cenoz and D. Lasagabaster (eds.) Hizkuntzak Ikasten eta Erabiltzen. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco. 221-242.
• Leung, Y.k.I. 2005. “L2 vs L3 initial state: A comparative study of the acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese monolingual and Cantonese-English bilinguals”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8: 39-61.
• Leung, Y.k.I. 2007. “L3 acquisition: why it is interesting to generative linguistics”. Second Language Research 23(1): 95-114.
• Lozano, C. 2003. Universal Grammar and focus constraints: the acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Essex.
• Martohardjono, R. 1993. Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language: A cross-linguistic study of three languages with and without overt movement. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
• MacWhinney, B. 1991. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• O’Grady, W. 2003. “The radical middle: nativism without Universal Grammar”. In C. Doughty and M. Long (eds.) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Ortiz de Urbina, J. 1989. Parameters in the Grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Perales Haya, S. 2004. La adquisición de la negación en inglés por hablantes bilingües euskera-castellano. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad del País Vasco.
• Perales Haya, S., M. P. García Mayo and J. M. Liceras. 2004. The acquisition of negation by bilingual (Basque-Spanish) children. The age factor in an institutional setting. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL). University of Portland. Portland, Oregon (EE.UU).
• Perales Haya, S. 2007. “The acquisition of L3 English negation by bilingual (Spanish/Basque) learners” (submitted).
• Perales Haya, S. 2004. ‘The frog don’t appear’: Age and the acquisition of negation in bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Paper presented at the XIVth European Second Language Association (EUROSLA) Conference. Universidad del País Vasco. San Sebastián (Spain).
• Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: William Morrow and Co. Radford, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar. A First Course. Cambridge:
• Cambridge University Press. Schwartz, B. D. and R. Sprouse. 1996. “L2 cognitive states and the full
• transfer/full access model”. Second Language Research 12: 40-72. Slabakova, R. 2001. Telicity in the Second Language. Philadelphia: John
• Benjamins. Smith, N. and I.-M. Tsimpli. 1995. The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning
• and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell. Villareal Olaizola, I. and M. P. García Mayo. 2006. Tense and agreement in
• L3 acquisition: Content-based learning vs. the learning of English as a school subject. Paper presented at GLOBE 2006: Communicating across age groups: Age, language and society. Warsaw (Poland), 21-23 September.
• Villareal Olaizola, I. and M.P. García Mayo. 2007. Finiteness in English as an L3: Content-Based vs. English as a School Subject learners. Paper presented at The 6th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Hamburg (Germany), 30 May-2 June.
• White, L. 1989. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• ____. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.