La evaluación basada en la teoría y su aplicación a la política regionalalgunas reflexiones teóricas

Referencias bibliográficas

• ADE Enterprise PLC et al. (1999), Evaluation of Research, Technological Development and Innovation related actions under Structural Funds in Objetive 2 regions. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
• Amin, A. (1998), «Una perspectiva institucionalista sobre el desarrollo económico regional», Ekonomiaz 41: 69-89.
• Asheim, B.A. (1999), «Innovation, social capital and regional clusters: on the importance of co-operation, interactive learning and localised knowledge in learning economies», en Regional Potentials in an Integrating Europe. Bilbao: Regio- nal Studies Association International Conference.
• Autio, E. (1998), «Evaluation of RTD in Regional Systems of Innovation», European Planning Studies 2 (6): 131-140.
• Bachtler, J. y Michie, R. (1995), «A new era in EU regional policy evaluation? The appraisal of the Structural Funds», Regional Studies 8 (29): 745-751.
• Bachtler, J. y Michie, R. (1997), «The interim evaluation of EU regional development programmes: experience from Objective 2 regions», Regional Studies 9 (31): 849-858.
• Barnekov, T. y Hart, D. (1993), «The changing nature of US urban policy evaluation: the case of the Urban Development Action Grant», Urban Studies 9 (30): 1469-1483.
• Boekholt, P. et al. (1998), The evaluation of pre-pilot actions under Article 10. Innovative measures regarding RTP. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
• Bovaird, T. et al. (1991), «Improved performance in local economic development: a warm embrace or an artful sidestep?», Public Administration 69: 103-119.
• Comisión Europea (1999), Evaluating Socio-Economic Programes, Vols. 1-6. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de la Comisión Europea.
• Coulson, A. (1990), «Evaluating local economic policy», en M. Campbell, ed., Local Economic Policy. Londres: Casell Educational Limited.
• Connell, J. P. y Kubisch A. C. (1998), «Applying a Theory of Change approach to the evaluation of Comprehensive Community Initiatives: progress, prospects and problems» en K. Fulbright-Anderson et al. eds., New approaches to eva- luating Community Initiatives: theory, measurement and analysis. Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
• Connell, J.P. et al., eds. (1995), New Approaches to Evaluationg Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Context. Was- hington D.C.: Aspen Institute.
• Cooke, P. et al. (2000), The governance of innovation in Europe. Londres: Pinter.
• Cooke, P. y Morgan, K. (1998), The associational economy. Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Chen, H-T. (1994), «Theory-driven evaluations: need, difficulties and options», Evaluation Practic 1 (15): 79-82.
• Chen, H-T y Rossi P. (1994), «Issues in the theory-driven perspective», Evaluation and Program Planning, 4 (12): 299-306.
• Díez, M.A. (2001a), La evaluación de la política regional: propuestas para evaluar las nuevas políticas regionales. Tesis doctoral. Leioa: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
• Díez, M.A. (2001b), «Propuestas para evaluar las nuevas políticas regionales», Ekonomiaz 47: 182-205.
• Díez, M.A. (2002), «Evaluating new regional policies: reviewing the theory and practice», Evaluation 3 (8): 285-305.
• ECOTEC (1999), The ongoing evaluation of Regional Innovation Strategies. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
• Ernst & Young (1999), Thematic Evaluation of Structural Fund Impacts on SMEs. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
• Finne, H. et al. (1995), «Trailing Reserach. A model for useful program evaluation», Evaluation (1) 1: 11-31.
• Foley, P. (1992), «Local economic policy and job creation: a review of evaluation studies», Urban Studies, 3-4 (29): 557-598.
• Geddes, M. (1988), «Social audits and social accounting in the UK: a review», Regional Studies 1 (22): 60-65.
• Georghiou, L. (1998), «Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy», Evaluation 1 (4): 37-51.
• Gregory, D. y Martin, S. (1988), «Issues in the evaluation of inner city programmes», Local Economy 4 (2): 237-249.
• Hart, D. (1991), «US Urban policy evaluation in the 1980s: Lessons from practice», Regional Studies 3 (25): 255-261.
• Hebert, S. y Anderson A. (1998), «Applying the Theory of Change approach to two National, Multisite Comprenhensive Community Initiatives» en K. Fulbright-Anderson et al. eds., New approaches to evaluating Community Initiatives: theory, measurement and analysis. Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
• Higgins, T. et al. (1999), Thematic evaluation of the impacts of Structural Funds (1994-1999) on Research, technolocy Development and Innovation (RTDI) in Objective 1 and Objective 6. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
• Kuhlmann, S. (1998), «Moderation of policy making? Science and Technology Policy evaluation beyond impact measurement-the case of Germany», Evaluation 2 (4): 130-148.
• Landabaso, M. (2000), «EU policy on innovation and regional development», en F. Boekema, et al. eds., Knowledge, innovation and economic growth: the theory and practice of learning regions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
• Landabaso, M. et al. (1999), «Learning regions in Europe: theory, policy and practice through the RIS experience», 3rd International Conference on Technology and Innovation Policy: Global Knowledge Partnerships, Creating value for the 21 Century, Austin, EE.UU.
• Landabaso, M. y Reid A. (1999), «Developing Regional Innovation Strategies: The European Commission as Animateur», en K. Morgan y C. Nauwelaers, eds., Regional Innovation Strategies. The challenge for less-favoured regions. Londres: The Stationery Office.
• McEldowney, J.J. (1991), «Evaluation and European regional policy», Regional Studies 25: 261-265.
• Milligan, S. et al. (1998), «Implementing a Theory of Change evaluation in the Cleveland Community-Building Initiative: A case study» en K. Fulbright-Anderson et al., New approaches to evaluating Community Initiatives: theory, measurement and analysis. Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
• Murtagh, B. (1998), «Evaluating the Community impacts of urban policiy», Planning Practice & Research 2 (13): 129-138.
• Morgan, K. y Nauwelaers, C. eds., (1999), Regional Innovation Strategies. The challenge for less-favoured region. Regions, Cities and Public Policy Series, Regional Studies Association. Londres: The Stationery Office.
• P&G Sociedad de Estudios (1998), Evaluation of Community measures in support of European Community Business and Innovation Centres (EC-BICs). D. G. de Política Regional. Comisión Europea.
• Pawson, R. y Tilley, N. (1997), Realistic Evaluation. Londres: Sage Publications.
• Rogers, P. et al. (2000), «Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities», New Directions for Program Evaluation 87, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Rosenfeld, S.A. (1996), «Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration», Research Policy 25: 247-263.
• Saraceno, E. (1999), «The evaluation of local policy making in Europe», Evaluation 4 (5): 439-457.
• Stame, N. (2004), «Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity», Evaluation 1 (10): 58-76.
• Stame, N. (1999), «Small and medium enterprise aid programs: intangible effects and evaluation practice», Evaluation and Program Planning 22: 105-111.
• Storper, M. (1997), The regional world. Territorial development in a global economy. Nueva York: The Guilford Press.
• Torvatn, H. (1999), «Using program theory models in evaluation of industrial modernization programs: three case studies», Evaluation and Program Planning 22: 73-82.
• Turok, I. (1990), «Evaluation and accountability in spatial economic policy: a review of alternative approaches», Scottish Geographical Magazine 106: 4-11.
• Turok, I. (1991), «Policy evaluation as science: a critical assessment», Applied Economics 23: 1543-1550.
• Weiss, C.H. (1995), «Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring Theory-Based evaluation for Comprenhensive Community Initiatives for children and families» en J.P. Connell et al., New approaches to evaluating Community Initiatives: concepts, methods and contexts. Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute.