Idioma de aplicación y rendimiento en una prueba de comprensión verbal

Bibliographic References

• Ackerman,T.A.(1992) Didactic explanation of item bias,item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of educational measurement, 29(1), 67-91.
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC.American Psychological Association
• Artamendi, J.A. (1994) Rendimiento de bilingües en test de aptitudes según lengua/s de presentación. En I.Idiazabal y A.Kaifer (Eds.),Eficacia educativa y enseñanza bilingüe en el País Vasco (pag.89-116) Vitoria: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública
• Baker, F.B. (1994) EQUATE2: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory [Computer program]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Experimental Design
• Bontempo, R.(1993). Translation fidelity of psychological scales: An item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 24(2), 149-167.
• Brislin, R.W.(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
• Budgell, G.R., Raju, N.S. y Quarteti, D.A.(1995) Analysis of Differential Item Functioning in Translated Assessment Instruments. Applied psychological Measurement, 19(4), 309-321.
• Candell, G.L. y Hulin, C.L. (1986). Cross-language and Cross-cultural comparisons in scale translations. Independent sources of information about item nonequivalence. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 1(4), 417-440.
• Candell, G.L. y Drasgow, F.(1988): An iterative procedure for linking metrics and assessing item bias in item response theory. Applied psychological measurement, 12(3), 253-260.
• Collins, McCormick y Zatkin (1986) Factor recovery in binary data sets a simulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research 21, 377-391
• Collison, G.(1974) Concept form tion in a second language: a study of gahaniaian school chi ldren. Harvard Educational Review, 44, 441- 4 5 7 .
• Drasgow, F. (1984). Scrutinizing Psychological Test: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1),134-35.
• Drasgow,F. y Hulin, C.L. (1987). Cross-cultural meassurement. Revista interamericana de psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 21(1,2), 1-24.
• Drasgow, F. y Lissak, R.I. (1983) Modified parallel analysis: A procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. Journal of Applied psychology, 68(3), 363-373.
• Ellis, B.B.(1989) Differential item functioning: implications of tests translation. Journal of applied psychology, 74(6), 912-921.
• Ellis,B.B. (1991) Item response theory: a tool for assessing. Bulletin of the international test commission, 18, 33-51.
• Ellis, BB., Becker.P. y Kimmel, H.D.(1993). An item response theory evaluation on an english version of the Trier Personality Inventory (TPI). Journal of Cross-cultural psychology, 24(2), 133-148.
• Ellis, B.B., Minsel, B. y Becker, P. (1989) Evaluation of attitude survey translations: an investigation using item response theory. International journal of psychology, 24, 665-684.
• Elosua, P. y López.A(1999b) Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems y sesgo en la adaptación de dos pruebas verbales. Psicológica 20(1),23- 40
• Elosua,P., López, A. y Torres.E.(1999a) Adaptación al euskera de una prueba de inteligencia verbal. Psicothema, 11(1),151-161
• Elosua,P., López,A., Artamendi,J.A. y Yenes,F. (manuscrito enviado para su publicación) Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en la aplicación de pruebas psicologicas en entornos bilingües.
• Feldt, L.S.(1969). A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two test, Psychometrika, 34, 363-373.
• Ferrando,P.J.(1994) El problema del factor de dificultad: una revisión y algunas consideraciones prácticas. Psicológica, 15,2,275-283.
• Fidalgo,A.M.(1994) MHDIF: a computer program for detecting uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure [computer program] Dpto. Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo.2
• Hambleton, R.K.(1993). Translating achievement test for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 57-68.
• Hambleton, R.K.(1996) Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas:fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J.Muñiz (Coor.)Psicometría (pp.207-238). Madrid: Universitas, S.A.
• Hambleton, R.K. y Rogers, H.J.(1989) Detecting potentially biased test items:Comparison of IRT area and Mantel-Haenszel methods. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(4), 313-334.
• Holland, P.W. y Thayer, D.T.(1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer y H.J. Braun (eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hulin, C.L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item scale translations. Journal of cross-cultural Psychology, 18(2),115-142
• Hulin, C.L., Drasgow, F. y Komocar, J. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 818-825).
• Hulin, C.L., Drasgow, F. y Parsons, C.K. (1983) Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones/Irwin.
• Hulin, C.L. y Mayer,L. (1986) Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the job descriptive index into hebrew. Journal of applied psychology, 71(1), 83-94.
• Kelly, M., Tenezakis, M. Y Huntsman, R. (1973) Some unusual conservation behavior in children exposed to two culures. British journal of educational psychology, 43, 171-182
• Kim S.H. y Cohen, A.S. (1992). IRTDIF: A computer program for IRT differential item functioning analysis [Computer Program] University of Wisconsin-Madison.
• Lord, F.M.(1980). Applications of Item Response Theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers .
• Marascuilo, L.A. y Slaughter, R.E.(1981). Statistical procedures for identifying posible sources of item bias based on c 2 statistics. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(4), 229-248.
• Mislevy, R.J. y Bock, R.D.(1990). BILOG·3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models.[Computer program]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific software.
• Muñiz,J. Y Hambleton, R.K. (1992) Medio siglo de teoría de respuesta a los ítems. Anuarío de psicología. 52, 41-66.
• Palmer, M.(1972) Effects of categorization degree of bilingualism and language upon recall of select monolingual and bilingual. Journal of educational psychology, 63, 160-164.
• Reckase, M.D.(1979): Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230.
• Raju, N.S. Drasgow, F. y Slinde, J.A.(1993): An empirical comparison of the area methods, Lord’s chi square test, and the Mantel-Haenszel technique for assessing differential item functioning. Educational and psychological measurement, 53, 301-304
• Stocking, M.L. y Lord, F.M. (1983) Developing a common metric in Item Response Theory. Applied psychol ogical measurement, 7( 2 ), 201-210.
• Tatsuoka, M.M.(1988) Multivariate analysis:Techniques for educational and psychological research. New York:Macmillan
• Yuste, C. (1988). BADYG-E. Madrid. Ciencias de la educación preescolar y especial.