Efectos producidos por diferentes programas de interferencia contextual en la agilidad

  1. Javier Yanci Irigoyen 1
  2. Asier Los Arcos Larumbe 1
  3. Juan José Salinero Martín 2
  4. Carlos Plana Galindo 3
  5. Eneko Gil Monreal 4
  6. Ignacio Grande 5
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela
    info

    Universidad Camilo José Cela

    Villanueva de la Cañada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03f6h9044

  3. 3 Universidad de Zaragoza
    info

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    Zaragoza, España

    ROR https://ror.org/012a91z28

  4. 4 Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra
  5. 5 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

ISSN: 1577-0354

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 15

Número: 59

Páginas: 405-418

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15366/RIMCAFD2015.59.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openBiblos-e Archivo editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte

Resumen

En este estudio participaron 76 alumnos de 9-10 años de edad de un colegio público de educación primaria (44 chicos y 32 chicas). Los participantes fueron randomizados en función del resultado del pretest en cuatro grupos: interferencia contextual baja (ICB, n=19), interferencia contextual moderada (ICM, n=19) interferencia contextual alta (ICA, n=19) y Grupo Control (GC, n=19). El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer que método de entrenamiento de la agilidad en función de la interferencia contextual baja, moderada o alta (ICB, ICM e ICA) es más efectivo en escolares de cuarto curso de educación primaria, con el fin de dilucidar qué método de desarrollo de esta capacidad resultó el idóneo en esta etapa de escolarización. La agilidad fue evaluada mediante el test MAT2. Salvo en el grupo control (CG), se obtuvieron diferencias significativas en la agilidad (test MAT2), en todos los grupos después de un programa de intervención de 4 semanas de duración en alumnos del cuarto curso de primaria. Estas diferencias han sido superiores en el grupo de ICM (p<0,01, ES=1,12). Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p<0,05, ES=0,79) en el postest entre el grupo de ICM e ICB.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abernethy, B, Wann, J, and Parks, S. (1998) Training perceptual motor skills for sport. In: Training for Sport: Applying Sport Science. Elliott B, ed. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley, pp. 1–68.
  • Alves, JM, Natal, A, Abrantes, C, and Sampaio, J. (2010). Short-term effects of complex and contrast training in soccer players vertical jump, sprint and agility abilities. J Strength Cond Res, 24(4), 936-941.
  • Amusa, LO, Goon, DT, and Amey, AK. (2010). Gender diferences in neuromotor fitness of rural South African children. Med Sport, 63, 221-237.
  • Atkinson, G., and Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med, 26(4), 217-38.
  • Bishop, D. (1997). Reliability of a 1-h endurance performance test in trained female cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 29(4), 554-9.
  • Brown, WH, Pfeiffer, KA, McIver, KL, Dowde, M, Almeida, M, Joao, CA, and Pate, RR. (2006). Assessing preschool children’s physical activity: the observational system for recording physical activity in children-preschool version. Res Q Exerc Sport, 77(2), 167-176.
  • Brughelli, M, Cronin, J, Levin, G, and Chaouachi, A. (2008). Understanding change of direction ability in sport. Sports Med, 38(12), 1045-1063.
  • Chatterjee, S, and Bandyopadhyay, A. (1993). Effect of continuous slow-speed running for 12 weeks on 10-14 year old Indian boys. Br J Sport Med, 27(3), 179-185.
  • Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. Erceg, M, Zagorac, N, and Katic, R. (2008). The impact of football training on motor development in male children. Coll Antropol, 32(1), 241-247.
  • Finn, K, Johannson, N, and Specker, B. (2002). Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children. J Pediatric, 140, 81-85.
  • Herbert, EP, Landin, D, and Solmon, MA. (1996). Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low and high skilled students: An applied study. Res Q Exerc Sport, 67, 52–58.
  • Hertel, J, Denegar, CJ, Johnson, SA, Hale, SA, and Buckley, WE. (1999). Reliability of the Cybex reactor in the assessment of an agility task. J Sport Rehabil, 8, 24–31.
  • Holmberg, P. (2009). Agility training for experienced athletes: A dynamical systems approach. Strength Cond J, 31(5), 73-78.
  • Jackson, DM, John, JR, Kelly, LA, Montgomery, C, Grant, S, Paton, JY. (2003). Objectively measured physical activity in a representative sample of 3-4 year old children. Obesity Res, 11, 420-425.
  • Jeffreys I. (2006). Motor learning—Applications for agility, part 1. Strength Cond J, 28, 72–76.
  • Jovanovic, M, Sporis, G, Omrcen, D, and Fiorentini, F. (2010). Effects of speed, agility, quickness training on power performance in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res, 25(5), 1285-92.
  • Kostić, R, Miletić, D, Jocić, D, and Uzunović, S. (2003). The influence of dance structures on the motor abilities of preschool children. Facta Universitatis, Series Physical Education and Sport, 1(9), 83-90.
  • Lam, HM, and Schiller, W. (2001). A pilot study on the gross motor proficiency of Hong Kong preschoolers aged 5 to 6 years. Early Child Dev Care, 171(1), 11-20.
  • Landin, D, and Herbert EP. (1997). A comparison of three practice schedules along the contextual interference continuum. Res Q Exerc Sport, 68, 357–361.
  • Little, T, and Williams, AG. (2005). Specificity of acceleration, maximum speed, and agility in professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 19, 76–78.
  • McKenzie, TL, Sallis, JF, Broyles, SL, Zive, M, Nader, PR, Berry, C, and Brennan, J. (2002). Childhood movement skills: predictors of physical activity in Anglo American and Mexican American adolescents? Res Q Exerc Sport, 73(3), 238-244.
  • Melody, O, Schofield, GM, and Kolt, GS. (2007). Physical activity in preschoolers: Undestanding prevalence and measurement issues. Sports Med, 37(12), 1045-1070.
  • Meylan, C, and Malatesta, D. (2009). Effects of in-season plyometric training whitin soccer practice on explosive actions of young players. J Strength Cond Res, 23(9), 2605-2613.
  • Miller, MG, Herniman, JJ, Ricard, MD, Cheatham, CC, Michael, TJ. (2006). The effects of a 6-week training program on agility. J Sports Sci Med, 5, 459-465.
  • Oxyzoglou, N, Kanioglou, A and Ore, G. (2009). Velocity, agility and flexibility performance after handball training versus physical education program for preadolescent children. Perc Motor Skills, 108, 873-877.
  • Pate, RR, Pfeiffer, KA, Trost, SG, Ziegler, P, and Dowda, M. (2004). Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics, 114(5), 1258-63.
  • Pauole, K, Madole, K, Garhammer, J, Lacourse, M, and Rozenek, R. (2000). Reliability and validity of T-Test as a measure of agility, leg power, and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J Strength Cond Res, 14(4), 443-450.
  • Reilly, T, Williams, A, Nevill, A, and Franks, A. (2000). A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer. J Sports Sci, 18, 695-702.
  • Robles-Rodríguez, J, Giménez Fuentes-Guerra, FJ, y Abad Robles, MT (2011). Metodología utilizada en la enseñanza de los contenidos deportivos durante la E.S.O. Rev Inter Med Cienc Act Fis Dep, 10(41), 35-57.
  • Sanders, S. (1993). Developing appropriate movement practices for 3- to 5- year olds. Teaching Elementary Phys Educ, 4(5), 1-16.
  • Sassi, RH, Dardouri, W, Yahmed, MH, Gmada, N, Mahfoudhi, ME, and Gharbi, Z. (2009). Relative and absolute reliability of a Modified Agility T-Test and its relasionship with vertical jump and straight sprint, J Strength Cond Res, 23(6), 1644-1651.
  • Savelsbergh, GJP, Van der Kamp, J, Oudejans, RRD, and Scott, MA. (2004) Perceptual learning is mastering perceptual degrees of freedom. In: Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research Theory and Practice. Williams AM and Hodges NJ, eds. London, England: Routledge, pp. 374–389.
  • Schmidt, RA, and Wrisberg, CA. (2004) Motor Learning and Performance (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 183–275.
  • Serpell, BG, Ford, M, and Young, WB. (2009). The development of a new test of agility for rugby league. J Strength Cond Res, 24(12), 3270-7.
  • Serpell, BG, Young, WB, and Ford, M. (2011). Are the perceptual and decisionmaking components of agility trainable? A preliminary investigation. J Strength Cond Res, 25(5), 1240-8.
  • Sheppard, JM, Young, WB, Doyle, TLA, Sheppard, TA, and Newton, RU. (2006). An evaluation of a new test of reactive agility and its relationship to sprint speed and change of direction speed. J Sci Med Sport, 9, 342-349.
  • Singh, MA, Joon, BA, and Kooner, MA. (1987). Development of motor abilities of trained Indian boys of 9-16 years of age. Br J Sports Med, 21(2), 34-35.
  • Sporis, G, Milanovic, L, Jukic,I, Omrcen, D, and Sampedro, J. (2010). The effect of agility training on athletic power performance. Kinesiology, 42(1), 65-72.
  • Thomas, JR, Nad, JK, and Nelson, JK. (2001). Research Methods in Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Zivcic, K, Trajkovski, B, and Sentderdi, M. (2008). Changes in some of the motor abilities of prescholl chilgren (age four). Facta Universitatis, Phyiscal Education and Sport, 6(1), 44-50.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet