Designing Paint Mock-Ups for a Study of Novel Surface Cleaning Techniques for Munch’s Unvarnished Aula Paintings

Références bibliographiques

• Berman PG (2011) Strategisk modernitet: Munch og Universitetet. In: Anker P, Berman PG (eds) Edvard Munchs Aulamalerier. Messel Forlag, Oslo, pp 47–70
• Burnstock A, van den Berg KJ (2005) A pilot study of the effects of tri-ammonium citrate solutions used for surface cleaning paintings. In: AIC Paintings Speciality Group Postprints 17. AIC, pp 56–64
• Burnstock A, van den Berg KJ (2014) Twentieth Century Oil Paint. The Interface Between Science and Conservation and the Challenges for Modern Oil Paint Research. In: van den Berg KJ, Burnstock A, de Keijzer M, Krueger J, Learner T, de Tagle A, Heydenreich G (eds) Issues in Contemporary Oil Paint. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10100-2_1
• Burnstock A, van den Berg KJ, de Groot S, Wijnberg L (2007). An Investigation of Water-Sensitive Oil Paints in Twentieth-Century Paintings. In: Learner TJS, Smithen P, Krueger JW, Schilling MR (eds) Modern Paints Uncovered. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp 177–188
• Carlyle L, Hendriks E (2009) Visiting Claessens, Artists’ Canvas Manufacturers. News in Conservation, IIC 11 (April): 4–5
• Carlyle L, Witlox M (2005) Historically accurate reconstructions of artists’ oil painting materials. In: Clarke M, Townsend JH, Stijnman A (eds) Art of the Past: Sources and Reconstructions. Archetype Publications, London, pp 53–59
• Daudin-Schotte M, Bisschoff M, Joosten I, van Keulen H, van den Berg KJ (2013) Dry Cleaning Approaches for Unvarnished Paint Surfaces. In: Mecklenburg M, Charola AE, Koestler RJ (eds) New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings: Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute. Smithsonian Instition Scholary Press, Washington D.C., pp 209–219
• Doerner M (1969 (1921)) The materials of the artist and their use in painting with notes on the techniques of the old masters. Rupert Hart-Davis Ltd., London
• Domingues J, Bonelli N, Giorgi R, Fratini E, Gorel F, Baglioni P (2013) Innovative Hydrogels Based on Semi-Interpenetrating p(HEMA)/PVP Networks for the Cleaning of Water-Sensitive Cultural Artifacts. Langmuir 29 (8): 2746–2755
• Frøysaker T (2007) The paintings of Edvard Munch in the Assembly Hall of Oslo University. Their treatment history and the Aula-project. Restauro Forum für Restauratoren, Konservatoren und Denkmalpfleger 113 (4): 246–257
• Frøysaker T (2016) Munch’s ambivalence to Alma Mater: making, changes and challenges. Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung 30 (2): 338–350
• Frøysaker T, Liu M (2009) Four (of eleven) unvarnished oil paintings on canvas by Edvard Munch in the Aula of Oslo University. Preliminary notes on their materials, techniques and original appearances. Restauro Forum für Restauratoren, Konservatoren und Denkmalpfleger 115 (1): 44–62
• Frøysaker T, Miliani C, Liu M (2011) Non-Invasive Evaluation of Cleaning Tests Performed on "Chemistry" (1909–1916). A Large Unvarnished Oil Painting on Canvas by Edvard Munch. Restauro Forum für Restauratoren, Konservatoren und Denkmalpfleger 117 (4): 53–63
• Hubacek O (2016) Energy and Motion – Über die Reinigung von Jackson Pollocks Number 32. Restauro Forum für Restauratoren, Konservatoren und Denkmalpfleger 122 (4): 14–17
• Kremer D. Personal communication 4.1.2019
• Geldof M, Steyn L (2013) Van Gogh’s Cobalt Blue. In: Jansen L (ed) Van Gogh’s Studio Practice. Mercatorfonds, Amsterdam, pp 256–267
• Ormsby B, Soldano A, Keefe M, Phenix A, Learner TJS (2013) An empirical evaluation of a range of cleaning agents for removing dirt from artist’s acrylic emulsion paints. In: The AIC Painting Speciality Group Postprints, 38th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Conservation and Historic Works, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, May 11–14, 2010, vol 23. AIC, Washington D.C., pp 77–87
• Perry, R (1990) Problems of dirt accumulation and its removal from unvarnished paintings: A practical review. In: Hackney S, Townsend J, Eastaugh N (eds) Dirt and pictures separated: papers given at a conference held jointly by UKIC and the Tate Gallery, January 1990. The United Kingdom Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, London, pp 3–7
• Stols-Witlox M (2017) A Perfect Ground. Preparatory Layers for Oil Paintings 1550–1900. Archetype Publications. London, pp xi-xvi
• Stoveland LP, Stols-Witlox M, Ormsby B, Caruso F, Frøysaker T (2019) Edvard Munch’s monumental Aula paintings: a review of soiling and surface cleaning issues and the search for new solutions. In: Clarricoates R, Dowding H, Wright A (eds) Interactions of Water with Paintings. Archetype Publications. London, pp 85–99 
• Topalova-Casadiego B (2008) Tekniske aspekter ved Edvard Munchs maleri. In: Woll G (ed) Edvard Munch. Samlede malerier. Catalogue raisonné, Volume II. Cappelen Damm, Oslo, pp 424–458
• Tsang J-S (2011) Soot removal from acrylic emulsion paint test panels: A study of dry and non-contact cleaning. In: Bridgland J
• (ed) ICOM-CC 16th Triennial Conference Preprints, Lisbon, 19-23. September 2011. Critério, Almada, pp 1-9
• Tumosa CS, Mecklenburg MF (2013) Oil Paints: The Chemistry of Drying Oils and the Potential for Solvent Disruption. In: Mecklenburg MF, Charola AE, Koestler RJ (eds) New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings: Proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute. Smithsonian Institution Scholary Press, Washington D.C., pp 51–58