Why Don’t Heterosexual New Alternative Masculinities Choose Enchained Women for Either Sporadic or Long-Term Relationships?

  1. Canal-Barbany, Josep Maria 1
  2. Cañaveras, Paula 2
  3. Zubiri-Esnaola, Harkaitz 3
  4. Gómez, Aitor 4
  1. 1 Universidad Internacional de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Internacional de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00gjj5n39

  2. 2 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  3. 3 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  4. 4 Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    info

    Universitat Rovira i Virgili

    Tarragona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00g5sqv46

Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Masculinidades y cambio social

ISSN: 2014-3605

Année de publication: 2024

Titre de la publication: Junio

Volumen: 13

Número: 2

Pages: 83-99

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17583/MCS.13054 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Masculinidades y cambio social

Résumé

La investigación sobre la reproducción de modelos despreciativos y tóxicos en relaciones heterosexuales muestra sus efectos negativos sobre la salud, mientras que el proceso de socialización preventiva ilustra relaciones alternativas directamente relacionadas con valores igualitarios, pasionales y no violentos, que han demostrado producir efectos positivos sobre la salud. Esta investigación analiza el proceso de socialización estudiando cómo eligen los hombres sus relaciones afectivo-sexuales y cómo influye el enfoque de las nuevas masculinidades alternativas (NAM), que se definen por la confianza en sí mismos, la solidaridad y la fortaleza para enfrentarse a la violencia y a cualquier tipo de discriminación. Desde una metodología comunicativa, en primer lugar, se han realizado siete entrevistas semiestructuradas a hombres que siguen el enfoque NAM. En segundo lugar, se ha realizado un análisis de contenido centrado en discursos y mensajes en foros de internet y canciones sobre cómo los hombres explican sus elecciones e intereses en sus relaciones. Los resultados revelan que existen hombres que prefieren mujeres que se sienten atraídas por hombres igualitarios y no por hombres machistas y violentos. Este tipo de elecciones muestran una mejora en las relaciones afectivas y sexuales de los hombres heterosexuales, así como en su estado de salud.

Références bibliographiques

  • Ackard, D. M., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2002). Date violence and date rape among adolescents: Associations with disordered eating behaviors and psychological health. Child abuse & neglect, 26(5), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00322-8
  • Anderson, E., & McCormack, M. (2016). Inclusive Masculinity Theory: overview, reflection and refinement. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(5), 547-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1245605
  • Connell, R.W., & Messerschmidt, J.W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gend. Soc., 19, 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
  • Courtenay, J. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1385-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
  • Díez-Palomar J., Capllonch M., & Aiello E. (2014). Analyzing Male Attractiveness Models From a Communicative Approach: Socialization, Attraction, and Gender-Based Violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 844-849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414537205
  • Ganle, J. K. (2016). Hegemonic masculinity, HIV/AIDS risk perception, and sexual behavior change among young people in Ghana. Qualitative health research, 26(6), 763-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315573204
  • Fielder, R.L., & Carey, M.P. (2010). Predictors and Consequences of Sexual “Hookups” Among College Students: A Short-term Prospective Study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
  • Flecha, R., Puigvert, L., & Ríos, O. (2013). New Alternative Masculinities and the Overcoming of Gender Violence. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 88-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/rimcis.2013.14
  • Gómez, J., Latorre, A., Sánchez, M. & Flecha, R. (2006). Metodología comunicativa crítica [Critical communicative methodology]. Roure editorial.
  • Gómez, J. (2015). Radical Love: A Revolution for the 21st Century. Peter Lang.
  • Joanpere, M., & Morlà, T. (2019). Nuevas Masculinidades Alternativas. La lucha con y por el Feminismo en el Contexto Universitario. Masculinities and Social Change, 8(1), 44-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/MCS.2019.3936
  • Mahalik, J.R., Burns, S.M., & Syzdek, M. (2007). Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men’s health behaviors. Soc. Sci. Med., 64, 2201–2209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.035
  • McVittie, C., & Willock, J. (2006). “You can’t fight windmills”: how older men do health, ill health, and masculinities. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 788-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306288453
  • Napper, E., Montes, K., Kenney, S., & LaBrie, J. (2016). Assessing the Personal Negative Impacts of Hooking Up Experienced by College Students: Gender Differences and Mental Health. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 766-775, DOI:10.1080/00224499.2015.1065951
  • Nazareno, E., Vidu, A., Merodio, G., & Valls, R. (2022). Men Tackling Isolating Gender Violence to Fight against Sexual Harassment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (4),1924. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041924
  • Puigvert, L. (2014). Preventive socialization of gender violence moving forward using the communicative methodology of research. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(7), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414537221
  • Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2018). Definitions of coercive discourse, coerced preferences and coerced hooking-up. shorturl.at/rtRX2
  • Puigvert, L., Gelsthorpe, L., Soler-Gallart, M., & Flecha, R. (2019). Girls’ perceptions of boys with violent attitudes and behaviours, and of sexual attraction. Palgrave Commun, 5(56). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0262-5
  • Puigvert-Mallart, L.; Cullell, R.C.; Canal, J.M.; García-Yeste, C. (2022). Reducing Health Effects on Deceit in Heterosexual Sexual-Affective Relationships: The Impact of the Preventive Socialization Program (PSP). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2274. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042274
  • Pulido, C., Elboj, C., Campdepadrós, R., & Cabré, J. (2014). Exclusonary and Transformative Dimensions Communicative Analysis Enhancing Solidarity Among Women to Overcome Gender Violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 889-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414537212
  • Racionero-Plaza S., Ugalde L., Merodio G., & Gutiérrez-Fernández, N. (2020). “Architects of Their Own Brain.” Social Impact of an Intervention Study for the Prevention of Gender-Based Violence in Adolescence. Front. Psychol. 10, 3070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03070
  • Racionero-Plaza, S., Piñero León, J.A., Morales Iglesias, M, & Ugalde, L. (2021). Toxic Nightlife Relationships, Substance Abuse, and Mental Health: Is There a Link? A Qualitative Case Study of Two Patients. Front. Psychiatry 11, 608219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.608219
  • Redondo-Sama G., Díez-Palomar J., Campdepadrós R., & Morlà-Folch, T. (2020). Communicative Methodology: Contributions to Social Impact Assessment in Psychological Research. Front. Psychol, 11, 286. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2020.00286
  • Ríos-González, O., Ramis-Salas, M., Peña-Axt, J.C., & Racionero-Plaza, S. (2021). Alternative Friendships to Improve Men’s Health Status. The Impact of the New Alternative Masculinities’ Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042188
  • Roca, E., Merodio, G., Gomez, A., & Rodriguez-Oramas, A. (2022). Egalitarian Dialogue Enriches Both Social Impact and Research Methodologies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221074442
  • Rodríguez-Navarro, H., Ríos-Gonzalez, O., Racionero, S., & Macías, F. (2014). New Methodological Insights Into Communicative Acts That Promote New Alternative Masculinities. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(7), 870–875 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077800414537209
  • Ruiz-Eugenio, L., Puigvert, L., Ríos, O., & Cisneros, R. M. (2020). Communicative Daily Life Stories: Raising Awareness About the Link Between Desire and Violence. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(8-9), 1003-1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420938880
  • Seal, D. W., & Ehrhardt, A. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(4), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/136910501171698
  • Serrano Amaya, J. F., & Ríos González, O. (2019). Introduction to the Special Issue: Challenges of LGBT research in the 21st century. International Sociology, 34(4), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580919856490
  • Soler, M., (dir.) (2012). Impact of the communicative acts and the new masculinities. Government of Spain. Ministry of Science. shorturl.at/aftxM
  • Thien, D., & Del Casino Jr, V. J. (2012). (Un) Healthy men, masculinities, and the geographies of health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 1146-1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.687350
  • Torras-Gómez, E., Guo, M., & Ramis, M.M. (2019). Sociological Theory from Dialogic Democracy. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.4919
  • UN Women (2021). Facts and figures: Ending violence against women. United Nations. shorturl.at/cqLX3
  • Vrangalova, Z. (2015). Hooking up and psychological well-being in college students: Short-term prospective links across different hookup definitions. Journal of Sex Research, 52(5), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.910745
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women. World Health Organization. shorturl.at/wyHRX
  • Yang, Y. (2020). What’s Hegemonic about Hegemonic Masculinity? Legitimation and Beyond. Sociological Theory, 38(4), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120960792
La source de données: Dialnet