Análisis Comparativo de la Repetibilidad y Reproductibilidad de Dos Métodos de Medición de la Dimensión Vertical en Rehabilitación OralUna Revisión Sistemática

  1. Lorena Brenes Ortega 1
  2. Gorka Santamaría Arrieta 2
  3. Felipe J Fernández-González 3
  4. Nerea Martín Blanco 2
  5. José Antonio Vega Álvarez 4
  6. Eneko Solaberrieta 5
  7. Iker Bellanco de la Pinta 2
  8. Aritza Brizuela Velasco 6
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco UPV-EHU
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco UPV-EHU Departamento de Estomatología I
  3. 3 Universidad de Oviedo Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médicas
  4. 4 Universidad Autónoma de Chile Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud
  5. 5 Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU Departamento de Expresión Gráfica e Ingeniería de Proyectos
  6. 6 Universidad de Oviedo Prótesis y Oclusión Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médico Quirúrgicas
Revue:
International Journal of Odontostomatology

ISSN: 0718-381X 0718-3801

Année de publication: 2016

Volumen: 10

Número: 1

Pages: 55-62

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-381X2016000100010 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

D'autres publications dans: International Journal of Odontostomatology

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The objective of this work was to establish if the method of evaluation of the vertical dimension by cephalometry and the common one with joint rollers, obtains results without statistically significant differences. We carried out a systematic review based on the PICO methodology of the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine for Oxford. A question aimed at the objective was made, and a search strategy was developed using specific MeSH key words derived from the question in the Pubmed database up to 2015 and oral rehabilitation books. A total of 833 items were consulted by tittle, and for 26 of these full text was reviewed. Works on different methods for determining the vertical dimension were studied, with special emphasis on those based on cephalometric methods. Finally 9 articles fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and a critical assessment of the evidence level was performed. We did not find sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate the repeatability of these methods. It is necessary to realize randomized controlled trials comparing both methods to determine if they were statistically repeatable and reproducible.

Références bibliographiques

  • Abduo, J.. (2012). Safety of increasing vertical dimension of occlusion: a systematic review. Quintessence Int.. 43. 369
  • Abduo, J.,Lyons, K.. (2012). Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust. Dent. J.. 57. 2-10
  • Alonso, A. A.,Albertini, J. S.,Bechelli, A. H.. (1999). Oclusión y Diagnóstico en Rehabilitación Oral. Médica Panamericana. Buenos Aires.
  • Bassi, F.,Deregibus, A.,Previgliano, V.,Bracco, P.,Preti, G.. (2001). Evaluation of the utility of cephalometric parameters in constructing complete denture: Part I: placement of posterior teeth. J. Oral Rehabil.. 28. 234
  • Bassi, F.,Rizzatti, A.,Schierano, G.,Preti, G.. (2001). Evaluation of the utility of cephalometric parameters in constructing complete denture. Part II: placement of anterior teeth. J. Oral Rehabil.. 28. 349
  • Brzoza, D.,Barrera, N.,Contasti, G.,Hernández, A.. (2005). Predicting vertical dimension with cephalograms, for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 22. 98-103
  • Capusselli, H. O.,Schvartz, T.. (1987). Tratamiento del Desdentado Total. 3. Mundi. Buenos Aires.
  • Carossa, S.,Catapano, S.,Scotti, R.,Preti, G.. (1990). The unreliability of facial measurements in the determination of the vertical dimension of occlusion in edentulous patients. J. Oral Rehabil.. 17. 287
  • Carrera Vidal, C.,Larrucea Verdugo, C.,Galaz Valdés, C.. (2010). Detection of increases of Vertical Occlusal Dimension by Ricketts cephalometric analysis. Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral. 3. 79-85
  • Chou, T. M.,Moore, D. J.,Young, L. Jr.,Glaros, A. G.. (1994). A diagnostic craniometric method for determining occlusal vertical dimension. J. Prosthet. Dent.. 71. 568
  • Ciftci, Y.,Kocadereli, I.,Canay, S.,Senyilmaz, P.. (2005). Cephalometric evaluation of maxillomandibular relationships in patients wearing complete dentures: a pilot study. Angle Orthod.. 75. 821
  • Discacciati, J. A.,Lemos de Souza, E.,Vasconcellos, W. A.,Costa, S. C.,Barros, Vde. M.. (2013). Increased vertical dimension of occlusion: signs, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and options. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.. 14. 123
  • Fayz, F.,Eslami, A.. (1988). Determination of occlusal vertical dimension: a literature review. J. Prosthet. Dent.. 59. 321
  • Fayz, F.,Eslami, A.,Graser, G. N.. (1987). Use of anterior teeth measurements in determining occlusal vertical dimension. J. Prosthet. Dent.. 58. 317
  • Huumonen, S.,Sipilä, K.,Haikola, B.,Tapio, M.,Söderholm, A. L.,Remes-Lyly, T.,Oikarinen, K.,Raustia, A. M.. (2010). Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J. Oral Rehabil.. 37. 34
  • Koller, M. M.,Merlini, L.,Spandre, G.,Palla, S.. (1992). A comparative study of two methods for the orientation of the occlusal plane and the determination of the vertical dimension of occlusion in edentulous patients. J. Oral Rehabil.. 19. 413
  • Ladda, R.,Bhandari, A. J.,Kasat, V. O.,Angadi, G. S.. (2013). A new technique to determine vertical dimension of occlusion from anthropometric measurements of fingers. Indian J. Dent. Res.. 24. 316
  • Orthlieb, J. D.,Laurent, M.,Laplanche, O.. (2000). Cephalometric estimation of vertical dimension of occlusion. J. Oral Rehabil.. 27. 802
  • Quiroga Del Pozo, R.,Riquelme Belmar, R.,Sierra Fuentes, M.,Del Pozo Bassi, J.,Quiroga-Aravena, R.. (2012). Determinación de la Dimensión Vertical Oclusal en desdentados totales: comparación de métodos convencionales con el craneómetro de Knebelman. Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral.. 5. 20
  • Ramirez, L. M.,Echeverría, P.,Zea, F. J.,& Ballesteros, L. E.. (2013). Vertical dimension on edentulous patient: Relationship with symptoms reported. Int. J. Morphol.. 31. 672
  • Rizzatti, A.,Ceruti, P.,Mussano, F.,Erovigni, F.,Preti, G.. (2007). A new clinical method for evaluating the closest speaking space in dentulous and edentulous subjects: a pilot study. Int. J. Prosthodont.. 20. 259
  • Ricketts, R. M.. (1981). Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod.. 51. 115
  • Strajnic, L.,Stanisic-Sinobad, D.,Markovic, D.,Stojanovic, L.. (2008). Cephalometric indicators of the vertical dimension of occlusion. Coll. Antropol.. 32. 535
  • Tavano, K. T.,Seraidarian, P. I.,de Oliveira, D. D.,Jansen, W. C.. (2012). Determination of vertical dimension of occlusion in dentate patients by cephalometric analysis--pilot study. Gerodontology. 29. 297-305
  • (2005). The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J. Prosthet. Dent.. 94. 10-92
  • Unger, J. W.. (1990). Comparison of vertical morphologic measurements on dentulous and edentulous patients. J. Prosthet. Dent.. 64. 232
  • Yamashita, S.,Shimizu, M.,Katada, H.. (2015). A newly proposed method to predict optimum occlusal vertical dimension. J. Prosthodont.. 24. 287
  • Zielak, J. C.,Gulin Neto, D.,da Cunha, L. F.,Deliberador, T. M.,Giovanini, A. F.. (2014). Cephalometric approach to the occlusal vertical dimension reestablishment. Case Rep. Dent.. 2014. 920840