Collaborative writing, written corrective feedback and motivation among child EFL learners

Références bibliographiques

• Al Khalil, M. K. (2016). Insights from measurement of task-related motivation. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 243–262). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203489666
• Alshuraidah, A., & Storch, N. (2019). Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. ELT Journal, 73(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy057
• Alwaleedi, M. A., Gillies, R. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2019). Collaborative writing in Arabic as a second language (ASL) classrooms: A mixed-method study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422
• Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102338
• Calzada Lizarraga, A., & García Mayo, M.P. (2020). Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task: an exploratory study. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2, 52-72. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal
• Cambridge English (n.d.). Cambridge English: Flyers (YLE Flyers). Cambridge English language assessment.
• Cambridge English (2014). Young Learners. Young Learners English Tests (YLE). Sample Papers. Flyers. Cambridge University Press.
• Cánovas Guirao, J. (2011). The use of models as a written feedback tool in primary education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
• Cánovas Guirao, J., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2015). The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.002
• Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
• Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
• Coyle, Y., & Cánovas Guirao, J. (2019). Learning to write in a second language: the role of guided interaction in promoting children’s noticing from model texts. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.22
• Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in an L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 451–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612
• Coyle, Y., Cánovas Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002
• Coyle, Y., Férez Mora, P. A., & Solís Becerra, J. (2020). Improving reference cohesion in young EFL learners’ collaboratively written narratives: Is there a role for reformulation? System, 94, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102333
• Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158281
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei (Ed.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
• Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
• Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002
• Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
• García, F. J. (2011). Written corrective feedback: Testing the effects of reformulation with year 5 primary school learners [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
• García Mayo, M.P., & Gutierrez Mangado, J. (Eds.). (2020). English language learning in primary schools. Variables at play. Special Issue. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3).
• García Mayo, M.P., & Imaz Aguirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and attention to form among EFL primary school children. System, 80, 165-175.
• García Mayo, M.P., & Loidi Labandibar, U. (2017). The use of models as written corrective feedback in EFL writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 110-127.
• Hanaoka, O. (2006). Noticing from models and reformulations: A case study of two Japanese EFL learners. Sophia Linguistica: Working Papers in Linguistics, 54, 167–192.
• Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 459–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375369
• Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.008
• Kang, E. (2020). Using model texts as a form of feedback in L2 writing. System, 89, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102196
• Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback: A critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949
• Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained form think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 94(4), 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522
• Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x
• Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288
• Kopinska, M., & Azkarai, A. (2020). Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual versus pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10
• Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2013). Reformulation and Self-correction: Insights into correction strategies for EFL writing in a school context. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 29–49.
• Lázaro-Ibarrola, A., & Villarreal, I. (2021). Are EFL writers motivated or demotivated by model texts and task repetition? Evidence from young collaborative writers. International Journal of English Studies, 21(2), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.466401
• Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System, 94, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006
• Luquin, M., & García Mayo, M.P. (2020). Collaborative writing and feedback: A pilot study of the potential of models in primary EFL students' writing performance. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19007.luq
• Luquin, M., & García Mayo, M.P. (2021). Exploring the use of models as a written corrective feedback technique among EFL children. System,
• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102465
• Martínez, F., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). The use of models as a form of written feedback to secondary school pupils of English. International Journal of English Studies, 2, 143–170. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119241
• Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816641703
• Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. Routledge.
• Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197256
• Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3): 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
• Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7
• Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two type of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039
• Santos, M., López Serrano, S., & Manchón, R. (2010). The differential effects of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 131–154. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/1/114011
• Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge University Press.
• Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010
• Simard, D., Guenétte, D., & Bergeron, A. (2015). L2 learners’ interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: Insights from their metalinguistic reflections. Language Awareness, 24(3), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1076432
• Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179
• Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644
• Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters.
• Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effect of collaboration. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in foreign language learning (pp. 157–177). Multilingual Matters.
• Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
• Suzuki, W., Nassaji, H., & Sato, K. (2019). The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing. System, 81, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017
• Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
• Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning. The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
• Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to formulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5
• Thwaites, P. (2014). Maximizing learning from written output. ELT Journal, 68(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct098
• Vorobel, O., & Kim, D. (2017). Adolescent ELLs’ collaborative writing practices in face-to-face and online contexts: From perceptions to action. System, 65, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.01.008
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69–97). De Gruyter.
• Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670
• Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
• Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14, 464–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375369
• Zhai, M. (2021). Collaborative writing in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom: Learners’ perceptions and motivation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100836
• FUNDING INFORMATION
• This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under grant FFI2016-74950-P (AEI/FEDER/UE), and by the Basque Government under grant IT904-16.