La soledad en el cine a propósito de Lost in translation (2003) y Her (2013)

  1. Ortega-Lozano, Ramón 1
  2. Astobiza-Monasterio, Aníbal 2
  3. Salinas-Pérez, Virginia 3
  1. 1 Escuela de Enfermería y Fisioterapia San Juan de Dios. Universidad Pontificia Comillas (España)
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (España)
  3. 3 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de Málaga (España)
Montrer des affiliations +
Revue:
Revista de medicina y cine

ISSN: 1885-5210

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 19

Número: 4

Pages: 317-330

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/RMC.31205 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de medicina y cine

Résumé

This article analyzes the concept of loneliness through a narrative approach. For this purpose, the films Lost in Translation by Sofía Coppola and Her by Spike Jonze are compared. In both stories, characters harassed by loneliness can be seen. This work is supported, on the one hand, by Robert Weiss' theory on loneliness and, on the other, the methodology used by Donio-Bellgade et al. who designed a series of loneliness categories to analyze films. In this study the following have been used: 1) choosing to live alone by choice, 2) feeling alone living with others, 3) lack of social support and 4) depression and suicidal ideas. Based on these categories of loneliness, we analyze what happens to the protagonists of the two films.

Références bibliographiques

  • Murthy V. Work and the Loneliness Epidemic. Harv. Bus. Rev. [Internet]. 26 de septiembre de 2017 [citado 6 de febrero de 2023].
  • Jo Cox Commission on Loneliness. Combating loneliness one conversation at a time. The Jo Cox Foundation. 2017 [citado 6 de febrero de 2023].
  • d’Hombres B, Barjaková M, Schnepf SV. Loneliness and Social Isolation: An Unequally Shared Burden in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper SSRN. 2021; 14245.
  • Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC. Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 2009;13(10):447-454.
  • Moscoso, M, Ausín T. Soledades: una cartografía para nuestro tiempo. Madrid: Editorial Plaza y Valdés; 2021.
  • Hyland P, Shevlin M, Cloitre M, Karatzias T, Vallières F, McGinty G, et al. Quality not quantity: loneliness subtypes, psychological trauma, and mental health in the US adult population. Soc. Psychiatry. Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2019;54(9):1089-99.
  • Barreto M, Victor C, Hammond C, Eccles A, Richins MT, Qualter P. Loneliness around the world: Age, gender, and cultural differences in loneliness. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2021; (1)169: 110066. Doi:
  • Tomasello M, Rakoczy H. What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionalit Mind. Lang. 2003; 18: 121-147.
  • Maestripieri D. Neurobiology of Social Behavior. In: Platt M, Ghazanfar A, editors. Primate Neuroethology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 359-384.
  • Christakis N. Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society. New York: Little Brown Spark; 2019.
  • Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Ernst JM, Burleson M, Berntson GG, Nouriani B, et al. Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective. J. Res. Pers. 2006;40(6):1054-1085.
  • Cacioppo J, Patrick W. Loneliness: Human Nature and The Need For Human Connection. New York: W. W. Noston & Company; 2009
  • Murthy V. Together: The Healing Power of Human Connection in a Sometimes Lonely World. New York: Harper Wav; 2020
  • Villarroya O. Somos lo que nos Contamos: cómo los relatos construyen el mundo en que vivimos. Barcelona: Ariel; 2019
  • Harari JN. Sapiens: de animales a dioses. Barcelona: Debate; 2015
  • Harari JN. Homo Deus: breve historia del mañana. Barcelona: Debate; 2017
  • Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms. Ann. Behav. Med. 2010;40(2):10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8.
  • Peplau LA, Perlman D. Perspectives on loneliness. In Peplau LA, Perlman D, editors. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: Wiley; 1982. p. 1–8.
  • Ortega Lozano, R. La literatura como camino epistémico de lo inefable. En Chillón, JM, Requejo, M, Reguero, I (editores.). Antropología de la comunicación: acción y efecto en la literatura y los media. Madrid: Editorial Fragua; 2019, p. 359-370.
  • Kottow M. Humanidades médicas: ¿Decorativas o substantivas? El caso de literatura y medicina. Rev. Bras. Educ. Med. 2014;38(3):293-8.
  • Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008
  • Goodman CP. The Tacit Dimension. Polanyiana, 2003;2(1): 133-157.
  • Ayerbe L, Pérez-Piñar M. Aprender medicina de la literatura. Semergen. 2017;43(5):412-3.
  • García Sánchez JE, Trujillano Martín I, García Sánchez E. Medicina y cine ¿Por qué? Rev. Med. Cine. 2005;1(1):1-2.
  • Navarro FA. Biblioteca literaria para médicos, Rev. Med. Cine. 2015; 11(2): 97-104.
  • Weiss RS. Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1975.
  • Hombrados-Mendieta I, García-Martín MA, Gómez-Jacinto L. The Relationship Between Social Support, Loneliness, and Subjective Well-Being in a Spanish Sample from a Multidimensional Perspective. Soc Indic Res 2013;114(3):1013-34. Doi:
  • Donio-Bellegarde M, Pinazo Hernandis S, Núñez Domínguez T. La representación cinematográfica de la soledad en la vejez: Selección de films. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology: INFAD Revista de Psicología. 2014;1(2):185-192.
  • Fay R. «Her» and «Lost In Translation:» Two Sides of the Same Story [Internet]. Cinemasters. 2022 [citado 6 de febrero de 2023].
La source de données: Dialnet