¿Tiene género la divulgación científica? Análisis de los artículos publicados en The Conversation sobre el Covid-19

  1. Maider Eizmendi 1
  2. Simón Peña Fernández 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Revue:
TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

ISSN: 2695-9933

Année de publication: 2023

Volumen: 13

Número: 1

Pages: 1

Type: Article

DOI: 10.37467/REVTECHNO.V12.4513 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: TECHNO REVIEW: International Technology, Science and Society Review / Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad

Résumé

This article analyzes the articles published on Covid-19 in the Spanish version of The Conversation from a gender perspective through a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 306 texts published over a year. The results indicate a greater presence of men in the first moments of the health emergency, while female scientists have only had a greater presence in social issues. Likewise, the texts signed by women have obtained less interaction from the audiences and a higher proportion of negative responses.  

Références bibliographiques

  • Andersen, J. P., Nielsen, M. W., Simone, N. L., Lewiss, R. E., & Jagsi, R. (2020). Meta-Research: COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected. Elife, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58807
  • Alcíbar, M. (2015). Comunicación pública de la ciencia y la tecnología: una aproximación crítica a su historia conceptual. Arbor, 191(773), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.773n3012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.773n3012
  • Alonso-Arroyo, A.; Bolaños Pizarro, M.; González Alcaide, G.; Villamón, M., & Aleixandre Benavent, R. (2010). Análisis de género, productividad científica y colaboración de las profesoras universitarias de Ciencias de la Salud en la Comunidad Valenciana (2003-2007). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 33 (4), 624-642. https://bit.ly/3CHUBqm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2010.4.764
  • Amarasekara, I., & Grant, W. J. (2019). Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 68-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654
  • Andreu, J. (2001). Las técnicas de análisis de contenido: una revisión actualizada [en línea]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2PL0kkW (consulta: 15 de julio de 2021).
  • Anzivino, M. (2021). Is public engagement gendered? An analytical proposal using some evidence from Italy. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211002060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211002060
  • Cambronero-Saiz, B., Segarra-Saavedra, J., & Cristófol-Rodríguez, C. (2021). Análisis desde la perspectiva de género del engagement de los principales youtubers de divulgación científica= Analysis of the engagement of the main popular science youtubers from a gender perspective. Cuestiones de género: de la igualdad y la diferencia, 16, 511-525. https://bit.ly/3kc9xa4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18002/cg.v0i16.6914
  • Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., & Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes about gender and science: Women≠ scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244-260. https://bit.ly/3GEdHyU DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645
  • Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. Profesional de la información, 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
  • Chinetti, S. (2021). Academic productivity and pandemic. Evidence from female economists during the COVID-19 crisis. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Xh8GTM (consulta: 14 de julio de 2021).
  • Clavijo, A. (2021). Trajectories of scientific production and family conciliation of women researchers in Quito. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 14, 45-60. https://bit.ly/3Xr902h DOI: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.se1.2021.45-60
  • Conversation, The. 10 motivos que nos hacen diferentes. https://bit.ly/3vVXHDo
  • Côté, I. M., & Darling, E. S. (2018). Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? Facets, 3(1), 682-694. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2018-0002
  • Delgado López-Cózar E., & Martín-Martín A. (2020). La viralidad de la ciencia defectuosa: el contagioso impacto mediático de un preprint en bioRxiv sobre el coronavirus y sus efectos en la comunicación científica. Universidad de Granada. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3CJLlSV
  • Deryugina, T., Shurchkov, O., & Stearns, J. (2021, May). Covid-19 disruptions disproportionately affect female academics. In AEA Papers and Proceedings 111 (pp. 164-68). https://bit.ly/3IE7pSF DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211017
  • Diviu-Miñarro, C., & Cortiñas-Rovira, S. (2020). Cómo comunicar una pandemia a la sociedad: la visión de los profesionales. Estudio de caso de la Covid-19 en el sur de Europa. Profesional de la Informacion, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.12
  • Duch, J., Zeng, X. H. T., Sales-Pardo, M., Radicchi, F., Otis, S., Woodruff, T. K., & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2012). The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact. PloS one, 7(12), e51332. https://bit.ly/3CLNk99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051332
  • Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2021). Fewer and Later: Women as Experts in TED Talks about COVID-19. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 808–818. https://bit.ly/3W4tHzR DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040046
  • Eizmendi-Iraola, M., & Peña-Fernández, S. (2022). Gender Stereotypes Make Women Invisible: The Presence of Female Scientists in the Media. Social Sciences, 12(1), 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030
  • https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010030
  • González-Sala, F., & Osca-Lluch, J. (2018). Desigualdad de género en órganos directivos y producción científica de las revistas iberoamericanas de psicología de mayor visibilidad internacional. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 41 (3), e211. https://bit.ly/3QGNNzm DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.3.1506
  • Holden C. (2001). General contentment masks gender gap in first AAAS salary and job survey. Science, 294 (5541), 396-411. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5541.396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5541.396
  • Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://bit.ly/2TpxNr5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
  • Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 149-169. https://bit.ly/3CJXirz DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.149
  • Kalia, V., Patel, A. K., Moriarity, A. K., & Canon, C. L. (2017). Personal branding: a primer for radiology trainees and radiologists. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 14(7), 971-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.017
  • King, M. M., & Frederickson, M. E. (2021). The Pandemic Penalty: The gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity. Socius, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211006977
  • Krippendorff, K. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y Práctica. Paidos Comunicación.
  • Krukowski, R. A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M. I. (2021). Academic productivity differences by gender and child age in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine faculty during the COVID- 19 pandemic. Journal of Women's Health, 30(3), 341-347. https://bit.ly/3k0VKTy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8710
  • Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature News, 504(7479), 211. https://bit.ly/3iERiJP DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a
  • Lazcano-Peña, D., Viedma, G. C., & Alcaino, T. V. (2019). Comunicación de la ciencia desde la mirada de los investigadores universitarios: entre el indicador y la vocación. Formación universitaria, 12(6), 27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062019000600027
  • Lerchenmueller, M. J., Sorenson, O., & Jena, A. B. (2019). Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. bmj, 367. https://bit.ly/3IDpssa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6573
  • Mestres, M. G., García, A. M., & Romero, M. D. I. (2012). La percepción social de los principales divulgadores españoles de la ciencia/Social perception of the main Spanish popular-science communicators. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 18(2), 757. https://bit.ly/3W6T0kM DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2012.v18.n2.41044
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
  • Mueller, C. M., Gaudilliere, D. K., Kin, C., Menorca, R., & Girod, S. (2016). Gender disparities in scholarly productivity of US academic surgeons. Journal of Surgical Research, 203(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060
  • Myers, K. R., Tham, W. Y., Yin, Y., Cohodes, N., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., ... & Wang, D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature human behaviour, 4(9), 880- 883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y
  • Ortiz-Núñez, R. (2020). Análisis métrico de la producción científica sobre COVID-19 en SCOPUS.
  • Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 31(3). https://bit.ly/3ka4iYy
  • Palomar Verea, C. (2009). Maternidad y mundo académico. Alteridades, 19(38), 55-73. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/747/74714814005.pdf
  • Pereira, M. D. M. (2021). Researching gender inequalities in academic labor during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Avoiding common problems and asking different questions. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S2), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12618
  • Peters, H. P., Dunwoody, S., Allgaier, J., Lo, Y. Y., & Brossard, D. (2014). Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the “new media” online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles? EMBO reports, 15(7), 749-753. https://bit.ly/3H18FxK DOI: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201438979
  • Revuelta, G. (2018). Formación en comunicación en los estudios de grado. Análisis en las áreas de ciencias de la salud y la vida, ciencias ambientales y ciencias naturales. Mediaciones de la Comunicación, 13(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.2.2872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2018.13.2.2872
  • Segovia-Saiz, C., Briones-Vozmediano, E., Pastells-Peiró, R., González-María, E., & Gea-Sánchez, M. (2021). Techo de cristal y desigualdades de género en la carrera profesional de las mujeres académicas e investigadoras en ciencias biomédicas. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34, 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.10.008
  • Torres-Albero, C., Fernández-Esquinas, M., Rey-Rocha, J., & Martín-Sempere, M. J. (2011). Dissemination practices in the Spanish research system: scientists trapped in a golden cage. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510382361
  • Trench, B. (2009). Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the Internet. En Holliman, R., Whitelegg, L., Scanlon, E., Smidt, S. and Thomas, J. (Eds.). Investigating science communication in
  • the information age: Implications for public engagement and popular media (pp 166-180). Oxford University Press.
  • Van der Lee, R., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40), 12349-12353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510159112
  • Vasconcelos, E. F., Casali, M. E. A., de Araújo, K. A., & Pereira, K. L. (2021). O impacto da pandemia da COVID-19 no fenômeno do declínio organizacional: uma análise da produção científica. Brazilian Journal of Business, 3(1), 1075-1088. https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv3n1-061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34140/bjbv3n1-061
  • Vega, P. V. (Ed.). (2010). La feminización de las profesiones sanitarias. Fundacion BBVA.
  • Welbourne, D. J., & Grant, W. J. (2016). Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public understanding of science, 25(6), 706-718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515572068
  • Wimmer, R., & Dominick, J. (1996). La investigación científica de los medios de comunicación. Barcelona: Bosch Comunicación.
  • Wright, K. A., Haastrup, T., & Guerrina, R. (2021). Equalities in freefall? Ontological insecurity and the long-term impact of COVID‐19 in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12518
La source de données: Dialnet