Desarrollos y límites de la innovación responsableRRI y Open Science frente al entramado ideológico del progreso institucionalizado

  1. Hannot Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU
Revue:
Recerca: revista de pensament i analisi

ISSN: 1130-6149

Année de publication: 2022

Titre de la publication: Ética de la investigación: Configurar marcos para promover buenas prácticas

Número: 27

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6035/RECERCA.6140 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Recerca: revista de pensament i analisi

Résumé

The institutional pursuit of responsible innovation has largely focused on controlling the negative impacts and risks of scientific and technological progress. The very dynamics of science and technology have thustended to be approached as a self-contained phenomenon impervious to critical scrutiny. However, more recent EU science policy initiatives, such as Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) or Open Science, claim to advocate that the processes of science and innovation themselves (including the preferences and expectations underlying them) should be the subject of inclusive debate. Although they seem to be a substantial development in relation to the prevailing responsible innovation model, focused on controlling the unintended consequences and risks, their capacity to transform scientific-technological practices is also limited. They too are constrained by a normative (or ideological) horizon characterised by the assumption that techno-industrial progress is, in principle, harmonizable (compatible) with all manner of social, ecological and health-related milestones.

Références bibliographiques

  • Beck, Ulrich (1998). La sociedad del riesgo. Hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
  • Berlin, Isaiah (1990). The Pursuit of the Ideal [1988]. En Berlin, Isaiah. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas -editado por Henry Hardy- (1-19). London: John Murray.
  • Blok, Vincent y Lemmens, Pieter (2015). The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. En Koops, Bert-Jaap, Oosterlaken, Ilse, Romijn, Henny, Swierstra, Tsjalling y van den Hoven, Jeroen (eds). Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications (19- 35). Cham: Springer.
  • Bogers, Marcel, Chesbrough, Henry y Moedas, Carlos (2018). Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5-16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008 125617745086
  • Bush, Vannevar (1945). Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: Office of Scientific Research and Development.
  • Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre y Barthe, Yannick (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay On Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press.
  • Carson, Rachel (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Council of the EU (2013). Council Decision of 3 December 2013 establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon 2020 the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014- 2020) and repealing Decisions 2006/971/EC, 2006/972/EC, 2006/973/EC, 2006/974/EC and 2006/975/EC (2013/743/EU). Official Journal of the European Union (20.12.2013), L 347, 965-1041.
  • Council of the EU (2014). Council Directive 2014/87/Euratom of 8 July 2014 amending Directive 2009/71/Euratom establishing a Community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations. Official Journal of the European Union (25.7.2014), L 219, 42-52.
  • Cranor, Carl F. (2017). Tragic Failures: How and Why We are Harmed by Toxic Chemicals. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • David, Kenneth y Thompson, Paul B. (eds.) (2008). What Can Nanotechnology Learn from Biotechnology? Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience from the Debate over Agrifood Biotechnology and GMOs. Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Delogu, Bernardo (2016). Risk Analysis and Governance in EU Policy Making and Regulation: An Introductory Guide. Cham: Springer.
  • Dickson, David (1984). The New Politics of Science. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Douglas, Heather (2000). Inductive Risk and Values in Science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559-579. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/3 92855
  • Dunlap, Thomas R. (ed.) (2008). DDT, Silent Spring, and the Rise of Environmentalism: Classic Texts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • EC (2002). Science and Society: Action Plan. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • EC (2013). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013. Brussels.
  • EC (2016). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World – a vision for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EC (2018a). Annexes to the Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the specific programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, COM(2018) 436 final (7.6.2018). Brussels.
  • EC (2018b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, COM(2018) 435 final (7.6.2018). Brussels.
  • EC (2018c). OSPP-REC: Open Science Policy Platform Recommendations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EC (2019). Orientations towards the first Strategic Plan implementing the research and innovation framework programme Horizon Europe. Brussels.
  • EC (2020). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2018-2020: 5.ii. Nanotechnologies, Advanced Materials, Biotechnology and Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, C(2020)6320 of 17 September 2020. Brussels.
  • Eizagirre, Andoni, Rodríguez, Hannot e Ibarra, Andoni (2017). Politicizing responsible innovation: responsibility as inclusive governance. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 20-36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1440.101003
  • ERA [European Research Area] Expert Group (2008). Challenging Europe’s Research: Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA),
  • EUR 23326. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • European Parliament and Council of the EU (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2010) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC. Official Journal of the European Union (20.12.2013), L 347, 104-173.
  • Felt, Ulrike (rapporteur), Wynne, Brain (chairman), Callon, Michel, Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda, Jasanoff, Sheila, Jepsen, Maria, Joly, Pierre-Benoît, Konopasek, Zdenek, May, Stefan, Neubauer, Claudia, Rip, Arie, Siune, Karen, Stirling, Andy y Tallacchini, Mariachiara (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission (EUR 22700). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Frahm, Nina, Doezema, Tess y Pfotenhauer, Sebastian (2022). Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 47(1), 174-216. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243921999100
  • Gaskell, George (2008). Lessons from the Bio-Decade: A Social Scientific Perspective. En David, Kenneth y Thompson, Paul B. (eds.). What Can Nanotechnology Learn from Biotechnology? Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience from the Debate over Agrifood Biotechnology and GMOs (237-259). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
  • Godin, Benoît (2016). Making sense of innovation: from weapon to instrument to buzzword. Quaderni, 90, 21-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/quaderni.977
  • Greiving, Stefan (rapporteur) (2009). Goverscience seminar on inclusive risk governance (European Commission, EUR 23910). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Grunwald, Armin (2009). Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods. En Meijers, Anthonie (ed.). Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 9) (1103-1146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Guston, David. H. y Bimber, Bruce (1998). Technology Assessment for the New Century. Working Paper #7: Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University. New Brunswick, NJ. Recuperado de: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary ?doi=10.1.1.37.3230 [Consultado el 11 de febrero de 2022].
  • Hazlett, M. (2003). From the Depression to Atomic Power (1930s1960s). En Miller, Char (ed.). The Atlas of U.S. and Canadian Environmental History (118-141). New York & London: Routledge.
  • IRGC [International Risk Governance Center] (2020). Involving stakeholders in the risk governance process. Lausanne: EPFL International Risk Governance Center.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila (ed.) (2004). States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Kuntz, Marcel (2017). Science and Postmodernism: From RightThinking to Soft-Despotism. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(4), 283- 285. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.006
  • López Cerezo, José Antonio y Luján, José Luis (2000). Ciencia y política del riesgo. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Luján, José Luis y López Cerezo, José Antonio (2004). De la promoción a la regulación. El conocimiento científico en las políticas públicas de ciencia y tecnología. En Luján, José Luis y Echeverría, Javier (eds.). Gobernar los riesgos. Ciencia y valores en la sociedad del riesgo (75-98). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva/OEI.
  • Luján, José Luis y Todt, Oliver (2015). The Role of Values in Methodological Controversies: The Case of Risk Assessment. Philosophia Scientiæ, 19(1), 45-56. doi: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1 031
  • Lund Declaration (2009). Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of our Time. En New Worlds – New Solutions. Research and Innovation as a Basis for Developing Europe in a Global Context (The Swedish EU Presidency Conference – Final report), Uno Svedin (rapporteur), Lund (Sweden), 7-8 July 2009, pp. 40-41.
  • Macnaghten, Phil (2020). The Making of Responsible Innovation. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mayer, Katia (2015). From Science 2.0 to Open Science Turning rhetoric into action? STCSN E-Letter, 3(1). Recuperado de: http://stcsn.ieee.net/e-letter/stcsn-e-letter-vol-3-no-1/fromscience-2-0-to-open-science [Consultado el 29 de enero de 2021].
  • Mayo, Deborah G. y Hollander, Rachelle D. (eds.) (1991). Acceptable Evidence. Science and Values in Risk Management. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Moedas, Carlos (2015). Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World (SPEECH/15/5243). A new start for Europe: Opening up to an ERA of Innovation Conference. 22 de junio de 2015. Brussels. Recuperado de: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/det ail/en/SPEECH_15_5243 [Consultado el 17 de agosto de 2021].
  • Novitzky, Peter, Bernstein, Michael J., Blok, Vincent, Braun, Robert, Chan, Tung Tung, Lamers, Wout, Loeber, Anne, Meijer, Ingeborg, Lindner, Ralf y Griessler, Erich (2020). Improve alignment of research policy and societal values. Science, 369(6499), 39-41. doi: 10.1126/science.abb3415
  • Owen, Richard, Forsberg, Ellen-Marie y Shelley-Egan, Clare (2019). RRI-Practice Policy Recommendations and Roadmaps. RRI-Practice project report. Deliverable 16.2. Recuperado de: https://www.rripractice.eu/knowledge-repository/recommendations/ [Consultado el 18 de febrero de 2022].
  • Owen, Richard y Pansera, Mario (2019). Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation. En Simon, Dagmar, Kuhlmann, Stefan, Stamm, Julia y Canzler, Weert (eds.). Handbook on Science and Public Policy (26-48). Cheltenham y Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Owen, Richard, Pansera, Mario, Macnaghten, Phil y Randles, Sally (2021). Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation. Research Policy, 50(1): 104132. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.1 04132
  • Owen, Richard, Stilgoe, Jack, Macnaghten, Philip, Gorman, Mike, Fisher, Erik y Guston, Dave (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. En Owen, Richard, Bessant, John y Heintz, Maggy (eds.). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (27-50). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Perrow, Charles (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.
  • Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M. y Juhl, Joakim (2017). Innovation and the political state: beyond the myth of technologies and markets. En Godin, Benoît y Vinck, Dominique (eds.). Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias (68-94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M., Juhl, Joakim y Aarden, Erik (2019). Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovation imperative. Research Policy, 48(4), 895- 904. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015
  • Renn, Ortwin (1991). Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. En Kasperson, Roger E. y Stallen, Pieter Jan M. (eds.). Communicating Risks to the Public (287-324). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Renn, Ortwin (2004). The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management. En McDaniels, Timothy y Small, Mitchell J. (eds.). Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field (289-366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rip, Arie (1986). The Mutual Dependence of Risk Research and Political Context. Science & Technology Studies, 4(3/4), 3-15. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/690407.
  • Rodríguez, Hannot (2018). Nanotechnology and Risk Governance in the European Union: the Constitution of Safety in Highly Promoted and Contested Innovation Areas. NanoEthics, 12(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0296-3
  • Rodríguez, Hannot, Eizagirre, Andoni e Ibarra, Andoni (2019). Dynamics of responsible innovation constitution in European Union research policy: tensions, possibilities and constraints. En von Schomberg, René y Hankins, Jonathan (eds.). International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource (167-180). Cheltenham y Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Rodríguez, Hannot, Fisher, Erik y Schuurbiers, Daan (2013). Integrating science and society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations. Research Policy, 42(5), 1126-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006.
  • Roszak, Theodore (1969). The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Rycroft, Taylor, Trump, Benjamin, Poinsatte-Jones, Kelsey y Linkov, Igor (2018). Nanotoxicology and nanomedicine: making development decisions in an evolving governance environment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 20(2), 52. doi: 10.1007/s11051-018- 4160-3
  • Schot, Johan (2005). Constructive Technology Assessment. En Mitcham, Carl (ed.). Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics (423-426). Detroit: Macmillan Reference.
  • Schot, Johan y Rip, Arie (1997). The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
  • Schot, Johan y Steinmueller, W. Edward (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
  • Shelley-Egan, Clare, Gjefsen, Mads Dahl y Nydal, Rune (2020). Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 16: 7. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00103-5
  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin Sharon (1985). Science Policy, Ethics, and Economic Methodology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Stirling, Andy (2008). “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”. Power, Participation and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(2), 262-294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
  • Stirling, Andy (2016). Addressing scarcities in responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(3), 274-281. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1258946
  • Sunstein, Cass R. (2002). Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tancoigne, Elise, Randles, Sally y Joly, Pierre-Benoît (2016). Evolution of a concept: a scientometric analysis of RRI. En Lindner, Ralf, Kuhlmann, Stefan, Randles, Sally, Bedsted, Bjørn, Gorgoni, Guido, Griessler, Erich, Loconto, Allison y Mejlgaard, Niels (eds.). Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project (39-44). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI.
  • Timmermans, Job y Blok, Vincent (2021). A critical hermeneutic reflection on the paradigm-level assumptions underlying responsible innovation. Synthese, 198 (Suppl 19), 4635-4666. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1839-z
  • Tomellini, Renzo (2003). Is nanotechnology dangerous? ‘We need to know’, says Renzo Tomellini (interview). EurActiv: EU news and policy debates across languages (17 November 2003). Recuperado de: https://www.euractiv.com/section/all/news/is-nanotechnologydangerous-we-need-to-know-says-renzo-tomellini/ [Consultado el 23 de noviembre de 2018].
  • van Wezel, Annemarie P., van Lente, Harro, van de Sandt, Johannes J. M., Bouwmeester, Hans, Vandeberg, Rens L. J. y Sips, Adrienne J. A. M. (2018). Risk Analysis and Technology Assessment in Support of Technology Development: Putting Responsible Innovation in Practice in a Case Study for Nanotechnology. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 14(1), 9-16. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1989
  • Vig, Norman J. y Paschen, Herbert (eds.) (2000). Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • von Schomberg, Lucien y Blok, Vincent (2021). The turbulent age of innovation. Synthese, 198 (suppl. 19), 4667-4683. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-01950-8
  • von Schomberg, René (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. En Owen, Richard, Bessant, John y Heintz, Maggy (eds.). Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (51-74). Chichester: Wiley.
  • von Schomberg, René y Hankins, Jonathan (eds.) (2019). International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Cheltenham y Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Zwart, Hub, Landeweerd, Laurens y van Rooij, Arjan (2014). Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’. Life Science, Society and Policy, 10: 11. doi: 10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x
La source de données: Dialnet