Hacia una redefinición de la performance a partir de su documentación. Una sospecha sobre su ingreso en el museo

  1. Ayerbe Elola, Nerea 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Zeitschrift:
SOBRE: Prácticas artísticas y políticas de la edición

ISSN: 2444-3484

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Nummer: 7

Seiten: 49-57

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.30827/SOBRE.V7I.17790 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: SOBRE: Prácticas artísticas y políticas de la edición

Zusammenfassung

Since its inception at the end of the 1950s, performance has been defined as an ephemeral action that takes place in the physical co-presence of both the artist and the spectator in a certain place and at a specific time. This ontological definition of performance has o%en resulted in it being impossible to document, on the grounds that this would be contrary to its own raison d’être. But the truth is that this paradigm has been debunked in practice in two ways: firstly, by the history of performance art itself, which has resisted permanent disappearance, and secondly, by the treatment afforded to performance art in contemporary art museums. By raising awareness of this situation and acknowledging the debate generated by the permanence of performance, this study proposes a new understanding of performance that takes into account the importance of its materialisation.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Auslander, P. (1997). Vito Acconci and the politics of the body in postmodern performance. En P. Auslander (Ed.), From acting to performance (pp. 89-98). Routledge.
  • Auslander, P. (1999). Liveness. Routledge.
  • Auslander, P. (2006). The performativity of performance documentation. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, (84), 1-10.
  • Austin, J. L. (2003). Lecture I in how to do things with words. En P. Auslander (Ed.), Performance: critical concepts in literary and cultural studies (Vol. I). Routledge.
  • Brentano, R. (1994). Outside the frame: performance, art and life. En R. Brentano (Ed.), Outside the frame. Performance and the object (p. 277). Cleveland Center for Contemporary Art.
  • Buskirk, M. (2003). The contigent object of contemporary art. MIT Press.
  • Fischer-Lichte, E. (2004). Estética de lo performativo. Abada Editores.
  • Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of the performance. A new aesthetics. Routledge.
  • Goldberg, R. (1996). Performance art. Ediciones Destino.
  • Groys, B. (2005). Sobre lo nuevo. Ensayo de una economía cultural. Pre-Textos.
  • Jones, A. (1997). Presence in absentia: performance art and the rhetoric of presence. Art Journal, Winter, 56(4),11-18.
  • Jones, A. (1998). Body Art. Performing the subject. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked. Politics of performance. Routledge.
  • Schechner, R. (2002). Foreword: fundamentals of performance studies. En N. Stucky y C. Wimmer (Eds.), Teaching performance studies (pp. ix-xii). Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies: An introduction. Routledge.
  • Schneider, R. (2001). Performance remains. Performance Research, 6(2), 100-108.
  • Schneider, R. (2005). Solo Solo Solo. En M. Butt (Ed.), After criticism: New responses to art and performance (p. 215). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Schneider, R. (2010). Los restos de lo escénico. En I. de Naverán (Ed.), Hacer historia, reflexiones desde la práctica de la danza (pp. 12-20). Universidad de Alcalá.
  • Stiles, K. (2012). Alegría incólume: acciones artísticas internacionales. En P. Schimmel (Ed.), Campos de acción: entre el performance y el objeto, 1949-1979 (Vol. 3). Alias.
  • Ward, F. (1997). Some relations between conceptual and performance art. Art Journal, 56(4), 36-40.
  • Williamson, A. (2003). The unconscious performance. In Art, lies and videotape: Exposing Performance (pp. 78-84). TATE.