Gender pairings in EFL child task-based interaction

  1. Martínez-Adrían, María 1
  2. Gutiérrez-Mangado, María juncal 1
  1. 1 University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
Revue:
VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

ISSN: 1697-0381

Année de publication: 2022

Número: 19

Pages: 103-128

Type: Article

DOI: 10.35869/VIAL.V0I19.3761 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

Résumé

Few studies have tackled gender differences in second language (L2) interaction, and particularly, the effect of gender pairings on learning opportunities operationalized as Language Related Episodes (LREs) has been scarcely looked into (see Azkarai, 2015b; Azkarai & García-Mayo, 2012; Ross-Feldman, 2005, 2007). Additionally, these studies have targeted adult L2 learners and to our knowledge, no studies so far have been conducted with children. This paper will try to fill these gaps by analysing the effect of gender pairings on the occurrence, nature and resolution of LREs in a storytelling task performed by 10-12-year-old children. More specifically, it explores whether there are any differences between same-gender and gender-mismatched dyads, and between same-gender dyads (male-male vs female-female). Results show that type of pairing affects LRE production and resolution as more LREs were initiated and resolved in matched-gender dyads than in mixed-gender dyads. However, gender-pairing did not influence the outcome of the resolution, as a still low rate of targetlikeness was obtained in mixed- and matched-gender dyads. Additionally, no statistically significant differences were obtained between same-gender dyads, but female-female dyads were found to be more concerned with getting the message across and oriented to higher accuracy in the resolutions of meaning-related episodes.

Références bibliographiques

  • Adams, R. (2006). L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics,152, 7-34.
  • Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The Oral-literate Connection. Perspectives on L2 Speaking, Writing, and other Media Interactions. (pp. 243-265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Alcón, E. (1994). The role of participation and gender in non-native speakers’ classroom interaction. Working Papers on Language, Gender, and Sexism,4(1), 51-68.
  • Alcón, E., & Codina, V. (1996). The impact of gender on negotiation and vocabulary learning in a situation of interaction. International Journal of Psycholinguistics,12, 21-35.
  • Aries, E.J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female, and mixed groups. Small Group Behaviour,7(1), 7-18.
  • Azkarai, A. (2013). Gender and task-modality in EFL task-based interaction. Unpublished PhD thesis., The University of the Basque Country.
  • Azkarai, A. (2015a). L1 use in EFL task-based interaction: a matter of gender? European Journal of Applied Linguistics,3(2), 159-179
  • Azkarai, A. (2015b). Males and females in EFL task-based interaction: does gender have an impact on LREs? Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics,12, 9-35.
  • Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2017). Gender and age in child interaction in an EFL CLIL context: An exploratory study. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning Foreign Languages in Primary School: Research Insights. (pp. 103-123). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2012). Does gender influence task performance in EFL? Interactive tasks and language related episodes. In E. Alcón & M. P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Language Learners’ Discourse across L2 Instructional Settings. (pp. 249-278) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). Task modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research,19, 550-571.
  • Basterrechea, M., Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2017). Gender effects on strategic competence: A survey study on compensatory strategies in a CLIL context. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada (ELIA), 17, 47-70.
  • Birjandi, P., & Tabatabaei, O. (2010). Examining the impact of gender on task-based conversational interactions among EFL learners: The case of recasts. Curriculum Planning, Knowledge and Research in Educational Sciences, 7(26), 35-64.
  • Bohn, E., & Stutman, R. (1983). Sex-role differences in the relational control dimension of dyadic interaction. Women’s Studies in Communication,6, 96-104.
  • Bouffard, L. A., & Sarkar, M. (2008). Training 8-year-old French immersion students in metalinguistic analysis: An innovation in form-focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17(1), 3-24.
  • Cenoz, J. (2009). Towards Multilingual Education: Basque Educational Research from an International Perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • DiPrete, T. A., & Buchman, C. (2013). The Rise of Women. The Growing Gender Gapa in Education and What it Means for American Schools. New York: Russell Stage Foundation.
  • Fabes, R. A., Martin, C. L., & Hanish, L. D. (2003). Young children’s play qualities in same-, other-, and mixed-sex peer groups. Child Development,74, 921–932. Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Martínez-Adrián, M. (In press). Task modality effects on young learners’ language related episodes in collaborative dialogue. RESLA.
  • Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., Basterrechea, M., & Martínez-Adrián, M. (2020). Target language proficiency and reported use of compensatory strategies by young CLIL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30, 3-18.
  • García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Introduction. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning Foreign Languages in Primary School. (pp. xiii-xxiii). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (eds) Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Research Agenda and Pedagogical Potential. (pp.241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • García Mayo, M. P., & Hidalgo Gordo, M. A. (2017). L1 Use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 67, 132–145.
  • García Mayo, M.P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System,80, 165-175.
  • García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40-54.
  • Gass, S. & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in non-native speaker/nonnative speaker interactions. In R.R. Day (Eds.), “Talking to Learn”: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. (pp.327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
  • Gu, L. (2013). Language and gender: differences and similarities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities, and Management (ASSHM-13), 248-251.
  • Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J., & Basterrechea, M. (forthcoming). Investigating the effect of task modality on the production of LREs by young learners.
  • Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2014). Peer socialization of gender in young boys and girls. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development and Strategic Knowledge Cluster on Early Child Development, 1-4. http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/sites/default/files/textes-experts/en/2492/peer-socialization-of-gender-in-young-boys-and-girls.pdf
  • Holmes, J. (1994). Improving the lot of female language learners. In J. Sunderland(ed) Exploring Gender: Questions and implication of English Language Education., (pp. 156-162). London: Prentice Hall.
  • House, S., & Scott, K. (2009). Sparks 1. London: Richmond.Lasito, & Storch, N. (2013). Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal,44, 361-375.
  • Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & Azpilicueta Martínez, R. (2015). Investigating negotiation of meaning in EFL children with very low levels of proficiency. International Journal of English Studies, 15, 1-21. Gender pairings in EFL child task-based interactionVigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics125VIAL n_19 – 2022
  • Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. Gumperz(Eds.), Language and Identity. (pp.195-216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martínez-Adrián, M. (2020). ¿Los juntamos? A study of L1 use in interactional strategies in CLIL vs. non-CLIL primary school learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 58(1), 1-27.
  • Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (forthcoming). Task modality: The control of accuracy and edition in output. Martínez-Adrián, M., Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (In press). Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners: A review of task modality effects. Language Teaching for Young Learners.
  • McWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2009). Sex segregation in friendships and normative contexts across the life span. Developmental Review, 29, 201-220.
  • Mehta, C. M., & Strough, J. (2010). Gender segregation and gender-typing in adolescence. Sex Roles,63, 251-263.
  • Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18 (3-4), 384-402.
  • Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal,86(1), 97-111.
  • Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2017). Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,37, 62-76.
  • Pavlenko, A. (2001). “How am I to become a woman in an American vein?”: Negotiation of gender in second language learning. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Second Language Learning, Multilingualism, and Gender. (pp. 133-174). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
  • Pavlenko, A., & Piller, I. (2008). Language education and gender. In S. May & N. H. Hornberger(Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. (pp. 57-69). New York: Springer Science+Business Media LLC
  • .Payant, C., & Kim, Y. J. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: a classroom-based study. International Journal ofBilingual Education and Bilingualism,22(5), 614-627.
  • Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness,19(4), 261-279.
  • Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N. E., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition,13, 343 - 376.
  • Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. (pp. 9-34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Pica, T., Kang, H., & Sauro, S. (2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,28, 301-338.
  • Pinter, A. (2011). Children Learning Second Languages. Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pladevall Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching,10(3), 449-472.
  • Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions between second language learners: Exploring the role of gender. Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgetown University.
  • Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Eds.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies. (pp.52-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at Fairness: How our Schools Cheat Girls. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Shak, J., & Gardner, S. (2008). Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387–408.
  • Shehadeh, A. (1994). Gender differences and second language acquisition. Research Journal of Aleppo University (Arts and Humanities Series),26, 73 - 98.
  • Shehadeh, A. (1999). Gender differences and equal opportunities in the ESL classroom. ELT Journal 53, 256-261.
  • Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning: Introduction to a General Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33(4), 203-223.
  • Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In by C. Doughty & J. Williams (ed) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. (pp.64-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
  • Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Van Lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and the Language Learner: Ethnography and Second-Language Classroom Research. London: Longman.
  • West, C., & García, A. (1988). Conversational shift work: A study of topical transitions between women and men. Social Problems,35(5), 551-575.
  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, Gender and Society (pp.102-117). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
  • Zalbide, M., & Cenoz, J. (2008). Bilingual education in the Basque Autonomous Community: Achievements and challenges. In J. Cenoz (Ed.), Teaching through Basque. (pp.5-20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Zimmerman, D., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley(Eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. (pp.105-129). Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
La source de données: Dialnet