Pragmatics and rhetoric for discourse analysissome conceptual remarks

  1. Larrazabal, Jésus M. 1
  2. Koorta, Kepa 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revue:
Manuscrito: revista internacional de filosofía

ISSN: 0100-6045

Année de publication: 2002

Titre de la publication: Jul./Dez.

Volumen: 25

Número: 2

Pages: 233-248

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Manuscrito: revista internacional de filosofía

Résumé

This paper focuses on discourse analysis, particularly persuasive discourse, using pragmatics and rhetoric in a new combined way, called by us PragmaRhetoric. It can be said that this is a cognitive approach to both pragmatics and rhetoric. Pragmatics is essentially Gricean, Rhetoric comes from a new reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric, extending his notion of discourse to meso- and micro-discourses. Two kinds of intentions have to be considered: first, communicative intention, and, then, persuasive intention. The fulfilment of those intentions is achieved by a successful persuasive-communicative action. The psychological, philosophical and logical aspects derived from the pragma-rhetorical perspective are crucial in view of its applications in several practical domains.

Références bibliographiques

  • APOSTEL, L. (1971). Assertion logic and a theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4, 92-110.
  • ARISTOTLE, Rhetoric.
  • BAR-HILLEL, Y. (1971). Out of the Pragmatic Waste-Basket, Linguistic Inquiry 2, 401-407.
  • BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Questions de Sociologie (Paris, Minuit).
  • CAMPBELL, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Re-edited in 1936 (Southern Illinois University Press).
  • CONLEY, Th. M. (1990). Rhetoric in the European Tradition (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
  • DASCAL, M. and GROSS, A.G. (1999). The Marriage of Pragmatics and Rhetoric, Philosophy and Rhetoric 32(2).
  • EEMEREN, F.H. van (ed.) (2001). Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory (Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press).
  • EEMEREN, F.H. van, and GROOTENDORST, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (Dordrecht, Foris).
  • FOUCAULT, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses (Paris, Gallimard).
  • GARFINKEL, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).
  • GOFFMAN, E. (1981). Forms of Talk (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press).
  • GRICE, H.P. (1957). Meaning, Philosophical Review 66, 377-388. Reprinted in H.P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, Ma, Harvard University Press), 1989, pp. 213-223.
  • GRICE, H.P. (1969). Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions, Philosophical Review 78, 147-177. Reprinted in H.P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words.
  • (Cambridge, Ma, Harvard University Press, 1989), pp. 86-116.
  • ISOCRATES, Against the Sophists.
  • MORRIS, C. (1938), Foundations of the Theory of Signs. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (eds.), International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science I (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 77-138. Reprinted in C. Morris (1971), Writings on the general theory of signs (The Hague, Mouton).
  • PERELMAN, Ch. and L. OLBRECHT-TYTECA (1958). Traité de l’Argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique (Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles).
  • REBOUL, O. (1991). Introduction à la Rhétorique (Paris, P.U.F.).
  • RESCHER, N. (1968). Topics in Philosophical Logic (Dordrecht, Reidel).
  • SACKS, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Oxford, Blackwell).
  • SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E.A. and JEFFERSON, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation, Language 50, pp. 696-735.
  • SCHIFFRIN, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse (Oxford, Blackwell).
  • SEARLE, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
  • SEARLE, J. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • STRAWSON, P.F. (1964). Intention and Convention in Speech Acts, Philosophical Review 73, 439-60.
  • WALTON, D.N. (1989). Informal Logic (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
  • WATZLAWICK, P., J. HELMICK BEAVIN, and D. JACKSON DON (1972). Une Logique de la Communication (Paris, Seuil).
  • WHATELY, R. (1828). Elements of Rhetoric. Reprinted in 1857 (London, Parker & Son).
La source de données: Dialnet