Introduction. Practices of Memorialization and the Process of Social Reconstruction

  1. Martin J.M. Hoondert
  2. Gema Varona Martínez
Zeitschrift:
Oñati socio-legal series

ISSN: 2079-5971

Datum der Publikation: 2020

Titel der Ausgabe: Practices of Memorialization and the Process of Social Reconstruction

Ausgabe: 10

Nummer: 3

Seiten: 535-543

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1121 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Oñati socio-legal series

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Over the last century, Europe and the world have witnessed two world wars, civil wars, terrorist attacks, and abuse of power both by dictatorial regimes and in various institutional settings, all leading to serious violations of human rights. Today we continue to see the effects of such violations affecting large numbers of people. This special issue of Oñati Socio-Legal Series is about commemorative practices and their role in post-conflict societies regarding processes of social reconstruction and transitional justice. It also considers current alternatives and complementary systems of justice, like restorative justice and transformative justice to face mass-victimisation. Through practices of memorialization victimhood is defined, constructed, acknowledged or neglected. Their materialisation is often a result of negotiated outcomes involving a number of actors, legislation and institutions. By presenting case studies, the authors hope to enhance practices of memorialization and to critically contribute to the transitional or transformative justice agenda.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Bell, D., 2010. Memory, Trauma and World Politics: Reflections on the Relationship Between Past and Present. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Buckley-Zistel, S., and Schäfer, S., 2014. Memorials in Times of Transition (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Intersentia.
  • Connerton, P., 1989. How Societies Remember [online]. Cambridge University Press.Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628061 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Council of Europe, 2018. Protection of Victims of Terrorist Acts. Human Rights and Terrorism: Council of Europe Revised Guidelines [online]. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/protection-of-victims-of-terrorist-acts/168078ab54 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Dignan, J., 2005. Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union [online], L 315, of 14 November 2012. Availablefrom: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2012:315:TOC[Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Erll, A., Nünning, A., and Young, S.B., 2008. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Gallagher, T., 2003. The Balkans after the Cold War: From Tyranny to Tragedy[online].London: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398180[Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Gallen, J., 2016. Jesus Wept: The Roman Catholic Church, child sexual abuse and transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice [online], 10(2), 332-349. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijw003 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Jaeger, S., 2020. The Second World War in the Twenty-First-Century Museum: From Narrative, Memory, and Experience to Experientiality[online]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110664416 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Lekha Sriram, C., 2007. Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice. Global Society [online], 21(4), 579-591. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701562843 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • McAlinden, A.M., 2014. Deconstructing Victim and Offender Identites in Discourses on Child Sexual Abuse: Hierarchies, Blame and the Good/Evil Dialectic. The British Journal of Criminology [online], 54(2), 180-198. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt070 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Miller, E., 2018. Global Terrorism in 2017 [online]. Background Report. University of Maryland/START, August. Available from: https://www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_GTD_Overview2017_July2018.pdf[Accessed 18 November 2018].
  • Mutua, M., 2015. What Is the Future of Transitional Justice? International Journal of Transitional Justice [online], 9(1), 1-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju032 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Pouligny, B., Chesterman, S., and Schnabel, A., eds., 2007. After Mass Crime: Rebuilding States and Communities [online]. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. Available from: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:2479/pdf9789280811384.pdf [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Rieff, D., 2016. In Praise of Forgetting: Historical Memory and its Ironies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Simic, O., ed., 2017. An Introduction to Transitional Justice [online]. London/New York: Routledge. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672649 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • Terry, K.J., 2008. Stained glass: The nature and scope of child sexual abuse in the catholic church. Criminal Justice and Behavior [online], 35(5), 549-569. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808314339 [Accessed 21 April 2020].
  • United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, no date. Background: Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1992–1995[online]. Washington, DC: USHMM. Available from: https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/countries/bosnia-herzegovina/case-study/background/1992-1995 [Accessed 18 November 2018].
  • Vries, C.E. de, 2020. Don't Mention the War! Second World War Remembrance and Support for European Cooperation.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies[online], 58(1), 138-154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12981[Accessed 21 April 2020].
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet