Engarces del término precariedad con las nociones estéticas de visualidad, relacionalidad y liminalidad
ISSN: 1889-979X
Année de publication: 2018
Número: 19
Pages: 101-114
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Arte y políticas de identidad
Résumé
In recent times, the term precariousness has acquired a notorious centrality in innumerable discursive circuits, one of them being contemporary art. Thus, certain artistic practices and, as a consequence, particular dialectic processes that approach them, propose both formal devices and conceptual strategies to address and question the phenomenon of precariousness. In this text, we critically analyze some of the ideas raised regarding the issue of precariousness in contemporary art, more specifically linked to the notions of visuality (Ross, 2008), relationality (Bourriaud, 2009) and liminality (Van Gennep, 2008). Thereby, we principally examine how these three theoretical perspectives bind the artistic and the ethical-political aspects of art making together, to pinpoint those propositions that get closer to an idea of equilibrium in the ethical-aesthetical productivity of precariousness (Gielen, 2015). We find that whereas in the conceptions linked to visuality and relationality the purely aesthetical aspects prevail in relation to the ethical-political ones, liminality radically questions any systemic and hierarchic consensus of social institutions, due to its anti-structural character (Diéguez, 2009).
Références bibliographiques
- Bishop, C. (2006). The social turn: collaboration and its discontents. Artforum, 44(6), 178-183.
- Bürger, P. (1984). Theory of the Avant-Garde (M. Shaw, trad.). Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press. Recuperado de https://monoskop.org/images/d/d0/Buerger_Peter_The_ Theory_of_the_Avant-Garde.pdf
- Bourriaud, N. (2009). Precarious constructions. Answer to Jacques Rancière on art and politics En A precarious existence. Vulnerability in the public domain. Open! Platform for Art, Culture & the Public Domain, 17. Recuperado de https://onlineopen.org/ download.php?id=240
- Butler, J. (1991). Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, USA y Londres, Reino Unido: Routledge.
- Butler, J. (2004). Precarious lifes: the powers of mourning and violence. Nueva York, USA y Londres, Reino Unido: Verso.
- Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable?. Nueva York, USA y Londres, Reino Unido: Verso.
- Diéguez, I. (2009). Escenarios y teatralidades liminales. Prácticas artísticas y socioestéticas. Archivo virtual artes escénicas. Recuperado de https://inquietando.wordpress.com/textos-2/ escenarios-y-teatralidades-liminales-prácticas-artísticas-ysocioestéticas
- Gielen, P. (2015). The murmuring of the artistic multitude. Global art, politics and post-fordism (3ª ed.). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Valiz.
- Nogués-Pedregal, A.N. (2002). El ritual como proceso. En VV. AA., Youths. Red de apoyo para la prevención de la violencia en el medio escolar (pp. 221-229). Alicante, España: Excma. Diputación de Alicante – Programa Hipokkrat. Recuperado de http://www. dip-alicante.es/hipokrates/hipokrates_I/pdf/ESP/435e.pdf
- Rancière, J. (2004). Malaisie dans l’esthétique. París, Francia: Èditions Galilée.
- Rancière, J. (2008). Le spectateur émancipé. París, Francia: La Fabrique.
- Ross, C. (2008). Introduction: the precarious visualities of contemporary art and visual culture En O. Asselin, J. Lamoureux y C. Ross, (eds.), Precarious visualities. New perspectives on identification in contemporary art and visual culture. Montreal y Kingston, Canadá, London, UK, Ithaca, USA: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Recuperado de: https://books.google.es/book s?id=P8nRyZ6VoC4C&pg=PT14&hl=es&source=gbs_toc_r&cad= 3#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Schaeffer, J.M. (1987). L’image précaire, Paris, Francia: Le Seuil.
- Turner. V. (1980). La selva de los símbolos: aspectos del ritual ndembu (A. Cardín y R. Valdés Del Toro, trad.). Madrid, España: Siglo XXI.
- Van Gennep, A. (2008). Los ritos de paso (J.R. Aranzadi, trad.). Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.