Contra-públicos feministas e innovaciones democráticas. Estrategias para una profundización democrática inclusiva

  1. Jone Martínez-Palacios 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revue:
Revista de estudios políticos

ISSN: 0048-7694

Année de publication: 2017

Número: 178

Pages: 105-136

Type: Article

DOI: 10.18042/CEPC/REP.178.04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista de estudios políticos

Résumé

This article studies the benefits and the limits of integrating feminist counterpublics in democratic innovations, through inclusive democratization processes. We take Nancy Fraser’s definition of ‘counterpublics’, and propose an operational definition that was applied in fifteen democratic innovations undertaken in the Basque Country, between 1978 and 2016. Data extracted from 42 life stories of women participating either in one of the fifteen interventions, or in five focus groups, suggest that: 1) participants from among these counterpublics have a greater ability to detect the structures of oppression in participatory contexts; 2) participants from these counterpublics generate strategies to deal with situations of exclusion within democratic innovations that could be exportable to other social contexts ; and 3) although the identification of barriers is a first step to designing more inclusive democratic innovations, it is not sufficient to disable the reproduction of power relations based on domination. Understanding the complexity of domination is not sufficient, but it is necessary.

€ Voir financement

Information sur le financement

Financeurs

Références bibliographiques

  • Arsen, R. y Brower, D. (2001). Counterpublics and the State. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Blumler, J. y Coleman, S. (2001). Realising Democracy Online: A Civic Commons in Cyberspace. London: IPPR.
  • Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: California Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). Razones prácticas. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). Las estructuras sociales de la economía. Barcelona: Anagrama.
  • Chilvers, J. (2017). Expertise, Professionalization and Reflexivity in Mediating Public Participation in the Professionalization of Public Participation. En L. Bherer, M. Gauthier y L. Simard (eds.). The Professionalization of Public Participation (pp. 115-138). London: Routledge.
  • Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. En A. P. Hamlin y P. Pettit (eds.). The Good Polity (pp. 3643). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Floridia, A. (2017). From Participation to Deliberation. A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56-80. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.
  • Fraser, N. (1996). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the «Postsocialist» Condition. London: Routledge.
  • Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism. From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London, New York: Verso.
  • Fung, A. y Wright, E. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.
  • Gutmann, A. y Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into A Category of Bourgeois Society. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Jungkunz, V. (2013). Deliberative Silences. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (1), article 12. Disponible en: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art12.
  • Kadlec, A. y Friedman, W. (2007). Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power. Journal of Public Delibertaion, 3 (1), article. 8. Disponible en: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=jpd.
  • Karpowitz, C.; Chad, R., y Hammond, A. (2009). Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered. Politics and Society, 37 (4), 576-615. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226.
  • Karpowitz, C., Mendelberg, T. y Shaker, L. (2012). Gender Inequality in Deliverative Participation. American Political Science Review, 106 (3), 533-547. Disponible en: https://doi. org/10.1017/S0003055412000329.
  • Lagarde, M. (1990). Los cautiverios de las mujeres. Madrid: Horas y Horas.
  • Lagarde, M. (2006). Pactos entre mujeres y sororidad. Aportes para el debate, 123-135.
  • Landes, J. (1988). Women in the Public Sphere in the Age of Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Landwehr, C. (2014). Facilitating Deliberation: The Role of Impartial Intermediaries in Deliberative Mini-Publics. En K. Grönlund, K., A. Bächtiger y M. Setälä (eds.). Deliberative Minipublics (pp. 77-92). Colchester: ECPR.
  • Mansbridge, J. (1990). Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Mansbridge, J. (1994). Feminism and Democratic Community. En S. M. Okin (ed.). Schools of thought in politics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
  • Mansbridge, J. (1996). Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity. En S. Benhabib (ed.). Democracy and Difference: Contesting Boundaries of the Political (pp. 46-66). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Mansbridge, J. , Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M. y Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2 (1), article 7. Disponible en: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=jpd
  • Martínez-Bascuñán, M. (2012). Género, emancipación y diferencia(s). La teoría de Iris Marion Young. Madrid: PyV.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (2015). ¿Le importa el sexo a la democracia participativa? Revista de Estudios Políticos 168: 153-175. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.168.05.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (2016). Equality and Diversity in Democracy. How Can We Democratize Inclusively? Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35, 5/6: 350-63. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-04-2016-0030.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (2017a). Inclusive Democratization: Normative Proposals and Political Practices. Local Government Studies, 43, 4: 577-597. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0300393 0.2017.1303485.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (2017b). Democratizing Participation through Feminism. The Role of Feminist Subaltern Counterpublics In The Expansion of The Basque Public Sphere. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 43: 37-59. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.43.02.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (2017c). Exclusión, profundización democrática e interseccionalidad. Investigaciones Feministas, 8, 1: 53-71.
  • Martínez-Palacios, J. (ed.) (2017d). Innovaciones democráticas feministas. Madrid: Dykinson.
  • Pagé, G. (2014). L’art de conquérir le contrepublic: les zines féministes, une voie/x subalterne et politique? Recherches Féministes, 27 (2), 191-215.
  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720444.
  • Sanders, L. (1997). Against Deliberation. Political Theory, 25 (3), 347-376. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002.
  • Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511609848.
  • Soo, H. H. (2015). Inclusion, Equality, and Discourse Quality in Citizen Deliberations on Broadband. Journal of Public Deliberation, 11 (1), article. 3. Disponible en: http://www. publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1301&context=jpd.
  • Spada, P. y Vreeland, J. (2013). Who Moderates the Moderators? Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (2), artículo 3. Disponible en: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss2/ art3/.
  • Stephenson, M. (2000). The Impact of An Indigenous Counterpublic Sphere on the Practice of Democracy. Ohio: Kellogg Institute.
  • Woolf, V. (1989). A Room of One’s Own. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Young, I. M. (1989). Polity and Group Difference. Ethics, 99 (2), 250-274. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1086/293065.
  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (1993). Justice and Communicative Democracy Philosphy. En R. Gottlieb (ed.). Radical Philosophy: Tradition, Counter-tradition, Politics (pp. 23-42). Philadelphia: Temple University.
  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
La source de données: Dialnet