Un proceso de diálogo multiactor para la paz en el País Vasco

  1. Xavier Mínguez Alcaide
Revue:
Convergencia: Revista de ciencias sociales

ISSN: 1405-1435 2448-5799

Année de publication: 2017

Número: 73

Pages: 37-60

Type: Article

D'autres publications dans: Convergencia: Revista de ciencias sociales

Résumé

The article presents a dialogue process within the framework of the Basque Country conflict. Taking the proposals of systemic conflict transformation approach, a scene of dialogue was designed to generate consensuses on the fundamental issues that involves peace in Basque Country. After exposing the study’s theoretical foundation, the article explains the elements and phases of process of ongoing dialogue. Later, it presents consensuses obtained on the questions worked, that is, reconciliation and coexistence, memory and historical narrative, the political dimension of conflict, citizen participation for peace, victims and prisoners. Finally, the paper presents recommendations for peace in Basque Country, as the participation of all stakeholders, the adoption of the human rights as common floor for peace, the disarming of ETA and the transformation of penitentiary and counterterrorism policy

Références bibliographiques

  • Alvarez-Enparantza, José Luís (1997), Euskal Herria en el horizonte, España: Txalaparta.
  • Apalategi, Jokin (2006), Los vascos, de la nación al estado, España: Herritar Berri.
  • Bunker, Barbara Benedict y Alban, Billie T. (2006), The Handbook of Large Group Methods. Creating Systemic Change in Organizations and Communities, Estados Unidos: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Coleman, Peter T. (2006), “Conflict, complexity, and change: A meta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts – III”, en Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, vol. 12, núm. 4, Estados Unidos: American Psychological Association.
  • Coleman, Peter T. (2012) “Conclusion: The Essence of Peace? Toward a Comprehensive and Parsimonious Model of Sustainable Peace”, en Coleman, Peter T. y Deutsch, Morton [eds.], Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace, Estados Unidos: Springer.
  • Coleman, Peter T. et al. (2007), “Intractable conflict as an attractor: Presenting a dynamical model of conflict, escalation, and intractability, en American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 50, núm. 11, Estados Unidos: Sage Journals.
  • Duran, Lauren (2013), Conflicts in Myanmar: A systemic approach to conflict analysis and transformation. Disponible en: http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/downloadfunc=downloadFile&recordOId=3809452&fileOId=3809455 [12 de junio de 2015].
  • European Court of Human Rights (EHCR) (2013), Sentencia de la Gran Sala de la Corte Europea de Derechos Humanos sobre la demanda número 42750/09. Asunto Del Río Prada vs. España. Disponible en: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001127697#{“itemid”:[“001-127697”]} [12 de junio de 2014].
  • ETA (2011a), Comunicado de declaración de alto el fuego permanente y de carácter general. Disponible en: http://estaticos.elmundo.es/documentos/2011/01/10/comunicado_eta.pdf [08 de junio de 2011].
  • ETA (2011b), Comunicado de anuncio del cese definitivo de la actividad armada. Disponible en: http://gara.naiz.info/eta-anuncia-cese-definitivo-actividad-armada.php
  • [21 de noviembre de 2011].
  • Gawerc, Michelle I. (2006), “Peace-Building: Theoretical and concrete perspectives”, en Peace & Change, vol. 31, núm. 4, Estados Unidos: Peace History Society.
  • Gurr, Ted Robert (2000), Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century, Estados Unidos: United States Institute of Peace.
  • Horowitz, Donald L. (1985), Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Estados Unidos: University of California Press.
  • Johnson, Steven (2003), Sistemas emergentes. O qué tienen en común hormigas, neuronas,
  • ciudades y software. Madrid: Turner Publicaciones.
  • Körpen, Daniela et al. (2011), The Non-linearity of Peace Processes: Theory and Practice of Systemic Conflict Transformation, Estados Unidos: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
  • Lederach, John Paul (1998), Construyendo la Paz. Reconciliación sostenible en sociedades divididas, España: Bakeaz y Gernika Gogoratuz.
  • Lizarralde, Imanol (2012), Teoría francesa y táctica y estrategia del MLNV (1967-2009), Universidad del País Vasco: Tesis doctoral.
  • Mínguez-Alcaide, Xavier (2013), Una aproximación psicosocial al conflicto vasco. Construyendo la paz en espacio abierto, Universidad del País Vasco: Tesis doctoral.
  • Novak, Andrzej et al. (2012), “Sustainable Peace: A Dynamical Systems Perspective”, en Coleman, Peter T. y Morton Deutsch [eds.], Psychological Components of Sustainable Peace, Estados Unidos: Springer.
  • Owen, Harrison (1997a), Expanding our Now: The Story of Open Space Technology, Estados Unidos: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Owen, Harrison (1997b), Open Space Technology: A User’s Guide, Estados Unidos: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Owen, Harrison (2008), A brief user’s guide to open space technology. Disponible en: http://openspaceworld.com/usersguide.htm [19 de septiembre de 2009].
  • Unger, Barabara y Wills, Oliver (2006), Systemic conflict transformation. Guiding principles for practitioners and policy makers working on conflict, Berlín: Berghof Fundation for Peace Support.
  • Vallacher, Robin et al. (2010), “Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems”, en American Psychologist, vol. 65, núm. 4, Washington: American Psychological Association.
  • Wills, Oilver et al. (2006), The Systemic Approach to Conflict Transformation. Concept Fields of Application, Berlín: Berghof Fundation for Peace Support.