Experimental pragmatics, Ira Noveck & Dan Sperber (Arg.). Houndmills, Basingtoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2004, VIII + 348 or.

Références bibliographiques

• Bott, Lewis & Ira A. Noveck (2004), «Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences». Journal of memory and language 51 (3): 437-457.
• Breheny, Richard; Napoleon Katsos & John Williams (2005), «Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences». Cognition 100: 434-463.
• Carston, Robyn (1998), «Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicatures». In R. Carston & S. Uchida (arg.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 179-236 or.
• Chevallier, Coralie; Ira A. Noveck; Tatjana Nazir; Lewis Bott; Valentina Lanzetti & Dan Sperber (2008), «Making disjunctions exclusive». The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (11): 1741-1760.
• Chierchia, Gennaro (2004), «Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface». In A. Belletti (arg.), Structures and beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39-103 or.
• Gibbs, Raymond W. & Jessica F. Moise (1997), «Pragmatics in understanding what is said». Cognition 62: 51-74.
• Grice, Paul (1967): «Logic and conversation». In D. Davidson & G. Harman (arg.) (1975), The logic of grammar, Encino: Dickenson, 64-75 or. Argitaratua, baita ere, in P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (arg.) (1975), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, New York: Academic Press, 41-58 or. Berrargitaratua in P. Grice (1989), Studies in the way of words, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 22-40 or.
• Horn, Laurence (1984), «Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference». In D. Schiffrin (arg.), Form and use in context: Linguistic applications (GURT’84), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 11-42 or.
• Leech, Geoffrey (1992), «Corpora and theories of linguistic performance». In J. Svartvik (arg.), Directions in Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82 Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 105-122 or.
• Levinson, Stephen C. (2000), Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
• McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson (1996), Corpus linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Nicolle, Steve & Billy Clark (1999), «Experimental pragmatics and what is said: a response to Gibbs and Moise». Cognition 69: 337-354.
• Nieuwland, Mante S.; Tali Ditman, Gina R. Kuperberg (2010), «On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities». Journal of memory and language 63: 324-346.
• Noveck, Ira (2001), «When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature». Cognition 78: 165-188.
• Noveck, Ira A. (2009), «Inferential comprehension». In L. Cummings (arg.), The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, London: Routledge.
• Noveck, Ira (2009), «Meaning and inference linked to negation: An experimental pragmatic approach». In U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (arg.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave McMillan, 113-123 or.
• Noveck, Ira A. & Florelle Chevaux (2002), «The pragmatic development of and». In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (arg.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on language development, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 453-463.
• Noveck, Ira; Gennaro Chierchia; Florelle Chevaux; Raphaëlle Guelminger & Emmanuel Sylvestre (2002), «Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions». Thinking and reasoning 8 (4): 297-326 or.
• Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber (2007), «The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar implicatures’». In N. Burton-Roberts (arg.), Advances in pragmatics, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 184-212 or.
• Noveck, Ira; Coralie Chevallier, Florelle Chevaux (2009), «Children’s enrichments of conjunctive sentences in context». In P. De Brabanter & M. Kissine (arg.), Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models (Current research in the semantic/pragmatics interface vol. 20). Bingley: Emerald, 211-234 or.
• Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Ira A. Noveck (2009), «Developmental aspects of the semantic/pragmatic distinction». In S. Foster-Cohen (arg.), Language acquisition. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 196-215 or.
• Pouscoulous, Nausicaa & Bart Geurts (2009), «Embedded implicatures?!?». Semantics and pragmatics 2: 1-34.
• Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson (1986/95), Relevance. Communication & cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Tian, Ye; Richard Breheny & Heather J. Ferguson (2010), «Why we simulate negated information: A dynamic pragmatic account». The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (12): 2305-2312.