Gogoeta batzuk Naming and Necessityri buruz

  1. Devitt, Michael
  2. Kepa Korta trad.
Zeitschrift:
Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

ISSN: 1577-9424

Datum der Publikation: 2021

Titel der Ausgabe: Kripkeren Naming and Necessityk 40 (+1) urte

Nummer: 22

Seiten: 63-92

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1387/GOGOA.22599 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

Zusammenfassung

Artikulu honek Naming and Necessityren berrogeigarren urteurrena ospatzendu, eta batera biltzen ditu urteetan zehar lan horri buruz egin ditudan gogoeta batzuk. Nireustez gaizki ulertu diren liburuko alderdietan jartzen du arreta, edo atzeman ez direnetan,edo oker baztertu direnetan edo, besterik gabe, azpimarratzea merezi dutenetan.Hizkuntzaren filosofiarekin hasten da, lehendabizi erreferentziaren deskripzio-teorienkontrako Kripkeren argudiorik indartsuena, “ezjakite eta akatsa”ren argudioa, eztabaidatuz.Gero Kripkeren “irudi hobea”, kausal-historikoa eta zurruntasunari buruzko bere eztabaidahartzen ditu aintzat, eta, azkenik, “erreferentzia zuzena”, Kripkeri oker egotzitako doktrinaonargaitza. Gainerakoak biologia- eta kimika-klaseei eta banakoei buruz Kripkek proposatudituen doktrina esentzialistez dihardu. Zientziaren filosofo batzuek zorrotz kritikatu dituztedoktrina horiek. Nik uste dut dagozkien zientziek Kripkeren alde egiten dutela, ez kritikoenalde.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Ackerman, Felicia (Diana). 1979. “Proper Names, Propositional Attitudes and Non-Descriptive Connotations”. Philosophical Studies 35: 55-69.
  • Almog, Joseph. 1984. “Semantic Anthropology”. In French et al., 1984, 479-89.
  • Almog, Joseph. 1985. “Form and Content”. Nous 19: 603-16.
  • Almog, Joseph, John Perry eta Howard Wettstein (arg.). 1989. Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baker, Lynne Rudder. 1982. “Underprivileged Access”. Nous 16: 227-42.
  • Barker, M. J. 2010. “Species Intrinsicalism”. Philosophy of Science 77: 73-91.
  • Barwise, Jon eta John Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bianchi, Andrea (arg.). 2020a. Language and Reality from a Naturalistic Perspective: Themes from Michael Devitt. Cham: Springer.
  • Bianchi, Andrea. 2020b. “Reference and Causal Chains”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 121-36.
  • Bianchi, Andrea eta Alessandro Bonanini. 2014. “Is There Room for Reference Borrowing in Donnellan’s Historical Explanation Theory?”. Linguistics and Philosophy 37: 175-203.
  • Blackburn, Thomas. 1988. “The Elusiveness of Reference”. In French et al., 1988, 179-94.
  • Block, Ned. 1987. “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology”. In French et al., 1987, 615-78.
  • Boer, Steven. 1985. “Substance and Kind: Reflections on the New Theory of Reference”. In M. K. Matilal eta J. L. Shaw (arg.), Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 103-50.
  • Braun, David. 2020. “Still for Direct Reference”. In Bianchi 2020a: 193-235.
  • Cook, Monte. 1980. “If ‘Cat’ is a Rigid Designator, What Does it Designate?”. Philosophical Studies 37: 61-4.
  • Davidson, Donald eta Gilbert Harman (arg.). 1972. Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1972. “The Semantics of Proper Names: A Causal Theory”. Harvard PhD dissertation.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1974. “Singular Terms”. Journal of Philosophy LXXI: 183-205.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1980. “Brian Loar on Singular Terms”. Philosophical Studies 37: 271-80.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1981a. Designation. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1981b. “Donnellan's Distinction”. In French et al., 1981, 511-24.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1985. Critical Notice of Evans’ The Varieties of Reference 1982. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63: 216-32.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1989. “Against Direct Reference”. In French et al., 1989, 206-40.
  • Devitt, Michael. 1996. Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2001. “A Shocking Idea about Meaning”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 208: 449-72.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2002 “Meaning and Use”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 106-21.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2004. “The Case for Referential Descriptions”. In M. Reimer eta A. Bezuidenhout (arg.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 280-305.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2005. “Rigid Application”. Philosophical Studies 125: 139-65.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2008. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism”. Philosophy of Science 75: 344-82. Berrargitaratua, oin-ohar batzuk erantsita, in Devitt, 2010, 213-49.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2010. Putting metaphysics first: essays on metaphysics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2011a. “Deference and the Use Theory”. ProtoSociology 27: 196-211.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2011b. “Experimental semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXII: 418-435.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2012a. “Whither Experimental Semantics?”. Theoria 73: 5-36.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2012b. “Semantic Epistemology: Response to Machery”. Theoria 74: 229-33.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2012c. “Still Against Direct Reference”. In R. Schantz (arg.), Prospects for Meaning. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 61-84.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2015. “Should Proper Names Still Seem So Problematic?”. In A. Bianchi (arg.), On Reference: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 108-43.
  • Devitt, Michael. 2018a. “Historical Biological Essentialism”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 71: 1-7. Doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.05.004
  • Devitt, Michael. 2018b. “Individual Essentialism in Biology”. Biology and Philosophy 33: 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10539-018-9651-1
  • Devitt, Michael. 2020. “Stirring the Possum: Responses to the Bianchi Papers”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 371-455.
  • Devitt, Michael. argitaratzeko. “Defending Intrinsic Biological Essentialism”. Philosophy of Science.
  • Devitt, Michael eta Nicolas Porot. 2018. “The Reference of Proper Names: Testing Usage and Intuitions”. Cognitive Science 42: 1552-1585. doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12609. doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12609
  • Devitt, Michael eta Kim Sterelny. 1999. Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, 2. edizioa. 1. edizioa. 1987. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Dickie, Imogen. 2011. “How Proper Names Refer”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 43-78.
  • Domaneschi F., Vignolo M., Di Paola S. 2017. “Testing the Causal Theory of Reference”. Cognition 161: 1-9. doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.014
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions”. Philosophical Review 75: 281-304.
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1968. “Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again”. Philosophical Review 77: 203-15.
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1972. “Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions”. In Davidson eta Harman, 1972, 356-79.
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1974. “Speaking of Nothing”. Philosophical Review 83: 3-31.
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1983. “Kripke and Putnam on Natural Kind Terms”. In C. Ginet eta S. Shoemaker (arg.), Knowledge and Mind, New York: Oxford University Press, 84-104.
  • Donnellan, Keith S. 1989. “Belief and the Identity of Reference”. In French et al., 1989, 275-88.
  • Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.
  • Dupré, John. 1981. “Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa”. Philosophical Review 90: 66-90.
  • Ereshefsky Marc. 2010. “What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism”. Philosophy of Science 77: 674-85.
  • Evans, Gareth. 1973. “The Causal Theory of Names”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, gehigarria 47: 187-208.
  • Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. John McDowell arg. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Forbes, G. 1986. “In Defense of Absolute Essentialism”. In French et al., 1986, 3-31.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1979. Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1981. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 6, The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1984. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 9, Causation and Causal Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1986. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 11, Studies in Essentialism Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1987. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 10, Studies in the Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1988. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 12, Realism and Antirealism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 1989. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 14, Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language II. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • French, Peter A., Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. eta Howard K. Wettstein (arg.). 2007. Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 31. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Godman, Marion, Antonella Mallozzi eta David Papineau. 2020. “Essential Properties are Super-Explanatory: Taming Metaphysical Modality”. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6 (3): 316-34.
  • Godman, Marion eta David Papineau. 2020. “Species Have Historical not Intrinsic Essences”. In Bianchi, 2020a: 355-67.
  • Griffiths Paul. 1999. “Squaring the Circle: Natural kinds with Historical Essences”. In R. A. Wilson (arg.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 209-28.
  • Haber, M.H. 2012. “How to Misidentify a Type Specimen. Biology and Philosophy 27: 767-84.
  • Hendry, Robin. (argitaratzeko). “How (not) to Argue for Microstructural Essentialism”.
  • Horwich, Paul. 1998. Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Horwich, Paul. 2005. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Horwich, Paul. 2020. “Languages and Idiolects”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 285-96.
  • Ichikawa, J., I. Maitra eta B. Weatherson. 2012. “In Defense of a Kripkean Dogma”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1): 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00478.x
  • Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Jackson, Frank. 2020. “Language from a Naturalistic Perspective”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 155-71.
  • Kaplan, David. 1978. “Dthat”. In P. Cole (arg.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press: 221-43.
  • Kaplan, David. 1989a. “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”. In Almog, Perry eta Wettstein, 1989, 510-63.
  • Kaplan, David. 1989b. “Afterthoughts”. In Almog, Perry eta Wettstein, 1989, 565-614.
  • Kaplan, David. 2012. “An Idea of Donnellan”. In Joseph Almog eta Paolo Leonardi (arg.), Having in Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnellan. New York: Oxford University Press, 122-75.
  • Kitcher, Philip. 1984. “Species”. Philosophy of Science 51: 308-333.
  • Kripke, Saul A. 1972. “Naming and Necessity”. In Davidson eta Harman, 1972, 253-355.
  • Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kroon, Frederick. 1987. “Causal Descriptivism”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65: 1-17.
  • LaPorte, Joseph. 1997. “Essential Membership”. Philosophy of Science 64: 96-112.
  • LaPorte, Joseph. 2000. “Rigidity and Kind”. Philosophical Studies 97: 293-316.
  • Lepore, Ernest eta Barry Loewer. 1987. “Solipsistic Semantics”. In French et al., 1987, 595-614.
  • Leslie, Sarah-Jane. 2013. “Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition”. In T. S. Gendler eta J. Hawthorne (arg.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 108-65.
  • Lewens, T. 2012. “Species Essence and Explanation”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 751-57.
  • Levine A. 2001. “Individualism, Type Specimens, and the Scrutability of Species Membership”. Biology and Philosophy 16: 325-38.
  • Lewis, David. 1984. “Putnam’s Paradox”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221-36.
  • Loar, Brian. 1976. “The Semantics of Singular Terms”. Philosophical Studies 30: 353-77.
  • Ludwig, K. 2007. “The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First-Person Approach vs. ThirdPerson Approach”. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31: 128-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00160.x.
  • Lycan, William G. 1985. “The Paradox of Naming”. In B. K. Matilal eta J. L. Shaw (arg.), Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective. Dordrecht: D. Reidel: 81-102.
  • Macbeth, Danielle. 1995. “Names, Natural Kind Terms, and Rigid Designation”. Philosophical Studies 79: 259-81.
  • McGinn, Colin. 1976. “On the Necessity of Origin”. Journal of Philosophy 73: 127-35.
  • McGinn, Colin. 1982. “The Structure of Content”. In A. Woodfield (arg.), Thought and Object, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 207-58.
  • McKay, Tom. 1981. “On Proper Names in Belief Ascriptions”. Philosophical Studies 39: 287-303.
  • Machery, E. 2012a. “Expertise and Intuitions about Reference”. Theoria 73: 37-54. https://doi.org/theoria20122712
  • Machery, E. 2012b. “Semantic Epistemology: A Brief Response to Devitt”. Theoria 74: 223-27. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.6223
  • Machery, E., R. Mallon, S. Nichols eta S. P. Stich. 2004. “Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style”. Cognition, 92 (3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.003
  • Machery, E., R. Mallon, S. Nichols eta S. P. Stich. 2013. “If Folk Intuitions Vary, Then What?”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3): 618-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00555.x
  • Machery, E., C. Y. Olivola eta M. de Blanc. 2009. “Linguistic and Metalinguistic Intuitions in the Philosophy of Language”. Analysis, 69 (4): 689-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp095
  • Machery, E. eta S. P. Stich, S. P. 2012. “The Role of Experiments”. In G. Russell eta D. Graff Fara, (arg.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. New York: Routledge, 495-512.
  • Mallozzi, Antonella. 2018. “Putting Modal Metaphysics First”. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1828-2
  • Marcus, Ruth Barcan. 1961. “Modalities and Intensional Language”. Synthese 13: 303-22.
  • Martí, Genoveva. 2009. “Against Semantic Multi-Culturalism”. Analysis 69 (1), 42-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ann007
  • Martí, Genoveva. 2012. “Empirical Data and the Theory of Reference”. In W. P. Kabasenche, M. O’Rourke eta M. H. Slater (arg.), Reference and Referring. Topics in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 62-76.
  • Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mercier, Adèle. 1999. “On Communication-Based De Re Thought, Commitments De Dicto, and Word-Individuation”. In K. Murasugi eta R. Stainton (arg.), Philosophy and Linguistics, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 85-111.
  • Mondadori, Fabrizio. 1978. “Interpreting Modal Semantics”. In F. Guenther eta C. Rohrer (arg.), Studies in Formal Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 13-40.
  • Needham, Paul. 2011. “Microessentialism: What is the Argument?”. Nous 45: 1-21.
  • Okasha, S. 2002. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism”. Synthese 131: 191-213.
  • Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Putnam, Hilary. 1973. “Meaning and Reference”. Journal of Philosophy LXX: 699-711.
  • Putnam, Hilary. 1975. Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Putnam, Hilary. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Putnam, Hilary. 2001: “Reply to Devitt”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 208: 495-502.
  • Raatikainen, Panu. 2020. “Theories of Reference: What Was the Question?”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 69-103.
  • Robertson T. 1998. “Possibilities and the Arguments for Origin Essentialism”. Mind 107: 729-49.
  • Robertson T. eta P. Atkins. 2016. “Essential vs Accidental Properties”. In E. Zalta (arg.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition) https://platostanfordedu/archives/sum2016/entries/essential-accidental/
  • Ruse, Michael. 1987. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 225-42. Berrargitaratua in M. Ereshefsky (arg.), The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 343-61. [Aipua Ereshefsky 1992koa da.]
  • Salmon, Nathan. 1979. “How not to Derive Essentialism”. Journal of Philosophy 76: 703-25.
  • Salmon, Nathan. 1986. Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Salmon, Nathan. 2020. “Naming and Non-Necessity”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 237-48.
  • Schiffer, Stephen. 1979. “Naming and Knowing”. In French et al., 1979, 61-74.
  • Schwartz, Stephen P. 1977. “Introduction”. In S. P. Schwartz (arg.), Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 13-41.
  • Schwartz, Stephen P. 1980. “Formal Semantics and Natural Kind Terms”. Philosophical Studies 38: 189-98.
  • Schwartz, Stephen P. 2002. “Kinds, General Terms, and Rigidity”. Philosophical Studies 109: 265-77.
  • Schwartz, Stephen P. 2020. “Against Rigidity for General Terms”. In Bianchi, 2020a, 249-66.
  • Searle, John R. 1958. “Proper Names”. Mind 67: 166-73.
  • Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slater, M. H. 2013. Are Species Real? An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Soames, Scott. 1985. “Lost Innocence”. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 59-71.
  • Soames, Scott. 1987. “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content”. Philosophical Topics 15: 47-87.
  • Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sober, Elliott. 1980. “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism”. Philosophy of Science 47: 350-83. Berrargitaratua in M. Ereshefsky (arg.), The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 247-78. [Aipua Ereshefsky 1992koa da.]
  • Sterelny, Kim eta Paul Griffiths. 1999. Sex and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
  • Sullivan, Arthur. 2010. “Millian Externalism”. In R. Jeshion (arg.), New Essays on Singular Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 246-69.
  • Sytsma, J., and J. Livengood. 2011. “A New Perspective Concerning Experiments on Semantic Intuitions”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2): 315-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048401003639832
  • Tahko, Tuomas E. 2015. “Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited”. Mind 124: 795-822.
  • Tye, Michael. 1978. “The Puzzle of Hesperus and Phosphorus”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56: 219-24.
  • Wagner, Steven J. 1986. “California Semantics Meets the Great Fact”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27: 430-55.
  • Weinberg, J. M., C. Gonnerman, C. Buckner eta J. Alexander. 2010. “Are Philosophers Expert Intuiters?”. Philosophical Psychology 23 (3): 331-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2010.490944
  • Wettstein, Howard. 1986. “Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?”. Journal of Philosophy LXIII: 185-209.
  • Wettstein, Howard. 2012. “On Referents and Reference Fixing”. In R. Schantz (arg.), Prospects for Meaning, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 107-18.
  • Witteveen J. 2015. “Naming and Contingency: The Type Method of Biological Taxonomy”. Biology and Philosophy 30: 569-86. doi: 101007/s10539-014-9459-6
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet