Privatization and environmental policy in a mixed oligopoly

  1. Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz
  2. Quan Dong
  3. María Bergoña Garzón
Revue:
Estudios de economía

ISSN: 0304-2758 0718-5286

Année de publication: 2019

Volumen: 46

Número: 2

Pages: 173-190

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4067/S0718-52862019000200173 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: Estudios de economía

Résumé

Abstract: This paper analyzes the interaction between two political economy decisions by a government: whether to privatize a public firm and what environmental policy to choose (an environmental tax or an emission standard). We find that when market competition is weak the government does not privatize the public firm and sets an environmental tax. When it is intermediate the public firm is not privatized and the government sets an environmental standard. Finally, when market competition is strong the government privatizes the public firm and is indifferent between a tax and a standard.

Références bibliographiques

  • Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C.. (2017). Taxes versus standards under cross-ownership. Resource and Energy Economics. 50. 36-50
  • Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C.. (2006). Mixed oligopoly and environmental policy. Spanish Economic Review. 8. 139
  • Bárcena-Ruiz, J.C.. (2017). Privatization of state holding corporations. Journal of Economics. 120. 171
  • Baumol, W.J.,Oates, W.E.. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press..
  • Bluffstone, R.. (2000). Environmental liability in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward an optimal policy. Environmental and Resource Economics. 17. 335
  • Corneo, G.. (1994). Oligopole mixte dans un marché commun. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique. 33. 73-90
  • De Fraja, G.. (1989). Alternatives strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers. 41. 302
  • De Fraja, G.. (1990). Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economic Surveys. 4. 1-17
  • De Fraja, G.. (2009). Mixed oligopoly: old and new.
  • Dong, Q.. (2017). Privatization and entry with switching costs. The Manchester School. 85. 491-510
  • Dong, Q.. (2018). Partial privatization of state holding corporations. The Manchester School. 86. 119
  • European Environment Agency. (2000). Environmental taxes: Recent developments in tools for integration. Environmental Issues Series.
  • European Environment Agency. (2005). Market-based instruments for environmental policy in Europe. EEA Technical Report.
  • Helfand, G.E.. (1999). Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Edited by Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh. USA.
  • Heuson, C.. (2010). Weitzman revisited: emission standards versus taxes with uncertain abatement costs and market power of polluting firms. Environmental Resource and Economics. 47. 349
  • Kato, K.. (2011). Emission quota versus emission tax in a mixed duopoly. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. 13. 43-63
  • Kato, K.. (2013). Optimal degree of privatization and the environmental problem. Journal of Economics. 110. 165
  • Lahari, S.. (2007). Relative emission standard versus tax under oligopoly: The role of free entry. Journal of Economics. 91. 107
  • Lin, M. H.. (2012). Presence of Foreign Investors in Privatized Firms and Privatization Policy. Journal of Economics. 107. 71-80
  • Lovei, M.. (2002). The Environmental Implications of Privatization. Lesson for Developing countries. World Bank Discussion Papers.
  • Matsumura, T.. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics. 70. 473
  • Matsumura, T.. (2010). Privatization waves. The Manchester School. 78. 609
  • Méndez-Naya, J.. (2007). Privatización y fusiones en oligopolios mixtos. Estudios de Economía. 34. 37-52
  • Méndez-Naya, J.. (2012). Fusiones nacionales e internacionales en oligopolios mixtos. Estudios de Economía. 39. 87-104
  • Naito, T.. (2009). Direct versus indirect environmental regulation in a partially privatized mixed duopoly. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. 10. 87-100
  • Ohori, S.. (2006). Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 29. 225
  • Ohori, S.. (2011). Environmental policy instruments and foreign ownership. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. 13. 65-78
  • Parker, D.. (1998). Privatisation in the European Union. Theory and policy perspectives.. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Parker, D.,Saal, D.. (2003). International handbook of privatization. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Requate, T.. (2006). The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer (eds.).
  • Wang, L.F.S.. (2009). Privatization and the environment in a mixed duopoly with pollution abatement. Economics Bulletin. 29. 3112