Reformas organizativas Versus Burocracia. “El caso de la Universidad ESTIA”. Organizational Reforms versus Bureaucracy “The Case of ESTIA University”

Références bibliographiques

• Citas Bentley, P.J., Coates, H., Dobson, I.R., Goedegebuure, L., y Meek, V.L. (2013). Factors associated with job satisfaction amongst Australian University academics and future workforce implications. P.J. Bently, H. Coates, I.R. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, y V.L. Meek, Job satisfaction around the academic world. Londres: Springer.
• Bess, J.L. (1988). Collegiality and Bureaucracy in the modern university. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
• Birnbaum, R. (2004). The End of Shared Governance: Looking Ahead or Looking Back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004 (127), 5-22.
• Bozeman, B., y Gaughan, M. (2011). Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154-186.
• Capelleras, J.L. (2005). Attitudes of academic staff towards their job and organisation: an empirical assessment. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(2), 147-166.
• Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503-517.
• Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Ángeles: University of California Press.
• Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, managerialism and leadership in English universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 1(2), 161-169.
• Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., y Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective. Higher Education, 56 (3), 325–348.
• Filippakou, O. y Tapper, T. (2007). Quality assurance in higher education: thinking beyond the english experience. Higher Education Policy, 20(3), 339–360.
• Frías, R. (2012). Estudio de Satisfacción del Profesorado en la Universidad Pública Española. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, (11), 175-204.
• Hagedorn, L.S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New directions for institutional research, 2000(105), 5-20.
• Harvey, L. (1995). The New Collegialism. Improvement with Accountability. Tertiary Education & Management, 1(2), 153-160.
• Herzberg, F., Mauser, B., y Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. New York: John Wiley.
• Krasner, S.D. (1988). Sovereignty. An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66-94.
• Lenartowicz, M. (2015). The nature of the university. Higher education, 69, 947-961.
• McInnis, C. (1998). Academics and Professional Administrators in Australian Universities: dissolving boundaries and new tensions 1. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), 161-173.
• Middlehurst, R. (2013). Changing Internal Governance: Are Leadership Roles and Management Structures in United Kingdom Universities Fit for the Future? Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 275–294.
• Millet, J.D. (1962). The academic community: an essay on organization. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
• Mintzberg, H. (1984). La estructura de las organizaciones. Barcelona: Ariel.
• Mora, J.G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 95-110.
• Olaskoaga, J., González, X., Marúm, E., y Onaindia, E. (2015). Reformas organizativas en las Instituciones de Educación Superior, condiciones laborales y reacciones de los académicos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 6(17), 102-118.
• Olaskoaga, J., Marúm, E., y Rosario, V. (2013). Configuraciones estructurales en las instituciones de educación superior y actitudes de los académicos frente a la calidad. Harvard Deusto Business Research, 2(2), 130-142.
• Padilla, L.E., Jiménez, L., y Ramírez, M.D.L.D. (2008). La satisfacción con el trabajo académico: Motivaciones y condiciones del entorno institucional que la afectan. El caso de una universidad pública estatal. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 13(38), 843-864.
• Paradeise, C., Reale, E., y Goastellec, G. (2009). A comparative approach to higher education reforms in Western European countries. In University governance, 197-225.
• Parker, M., y Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319-338.
• Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Rhoades, G. y Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1) 3-28.
• Salaburu, P., Mees, L., y Pérez, J.I. (2003). Sistemas universitarios en Europa y EEUU. Academia Europea de Ciencias y Artes.
• Shattock, M. (2013). University Governance, Leadership and Management in a Decade of Diversification and Uncertainty. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 217–233.
• Shin, J.C., y Jung, J. (2014). Academics job satisfaction and job stress across countries in the changing academic environments. Higher Education, 67(5), 603-620.
• Stensaker, B. y Vabø, A. (2013). Re-inventing shared governance: implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256-274.
• Szekeres, J. (2004). The invisible workers. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(1), 7-22.
• Szekeres, J. (2011). Professional staff carve out a new space. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6), 679-691.
• Tapper, T. y Palfreyman, D. (2002). Understanding collegiality: the changing oxbridge model. Tertiary Education & Management, 8(1), 47-63.
• Villarreal, O. y Landeta, J. (2010).El estudio de casos como metodología de investigación científica en dirección y economía de la empresa. Una aplicación a la internacionalización. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 3, 31-52.
• Waugh, W.L. (1998). Conflicting Values and Cultures: the Managerial threat to University Governance. Review of Policy Research, 15(4), 61-74.
• http://www.ambafrance-es.org
• http://www.estia.fr