La argumentación jurídica en la toma de decisión judicial

  1. Ezquiaga Ganuzas, Francisco Javier
Revue:
Revista Vasca de Administración Pública (RVAP). Administrazio Publikoaren Euskal Aldizkaria

ISSN: 0211-9560

Année de publication: 2014

Titre de la publication: Homenaje a Demetrio Loperena y Ramón Martín Mateo

Número: 99-100

Pages: 1309-1330

Type: Article

DOI: 10.47623/IVAP-RVAP.99.100.2014.055 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista Vasca de Administración Pública (RVAP). Administrazio Publikoaren Euskal Aldizkaria

Objectifs de Développement Durable

Résumé

The judicial decision making is not only a mental activity but it has an argumentative part that if it is taken into account can improve the decision. A theory about the legal reasoning that deals with the context of discovery allows to establish in a more precise way the requirements for a legal, rational, sufficient and complete reasoning and accordingly its control. Aspects that do often elude the content of an appropriate motivation, as the choice of the used interpretative arguments, the form of its use, the introduction and debate of the arguments by the parts or other judges, which would in this way be included among the motivating requisites of the judgment.