Percepción de los y las menores de la mediación parental respecto a los riesgos en internet

  1. E Jiménez Iglesias
  2. M Garmendia Larrañaga
  3. MÁ Casado del Río
Zeitschrift:
Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

ISSN: 1138-5820

Datum der Publikation: 2015

Nummer: 70

Seiten: 49-68

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista Latina de Comunicación Social

Zusammenfassung

Introduction: This article addresses the role of the various agents that mediate children‟s internet use: parents, teachers and peers such as classmates and friends. Method. The study is based on a qualitative approach that involved focus groups and interviews with children aged 9-16, and the analysis of children‟s discourses. Results. The results focus on children‟s perceptions of their relationship with their classmates, friends, teachers and parents in relation to internet use. Conclusions. Children show a high degree of awareness about the risks of the internet, and greatly value the support of their friends in solving the problems they find online. However, children do not trust their parents for the mediation of their online activities despite recognising that their parents are those who can help them out the most

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Barnard-Wills, David, (2012): “E-safety education: Young people, surveillance and responsibility” Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 12, nº 3, 239–255. doi:10.1177/1748895811432957.
  • Bringué, Xavier & Sádaba, Charo (Coords.), (2008): La generación interactiva en Iberoamérica: niños y adolescentes ante las pantalla, Barcelona: Colección Fundación, Telefónica, Editorial Ariel.
  • Brown, Bradford B. (2001): “Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence : Differences by attachment style”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 30, nº 6, pp. 653–674.
  • Buckingham, David, (2010):“The Future of Media Literacy in the Digital Age: Same Challenges for Policy and Practice”, Media Education Journal, nº 47, pp. 3-10.
  • Burgess, R. G. (1984). In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research, London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Byrne, Sahara, Katz, Serry Jean, Lee, Theodore, Linz, Daniel, & Mcilrath, Mary, (2014): “Peers, Predators, and Porn: Predicting Parental Underestimation of Children’s Risky Online Experiences”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 19, nº 2, 15–231. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12040
  • Byrne, Sahara, & Lee, Theodore, (2011): “Toward Predicting Youth Resistance to Internet Risk Prevention Strategies”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 55, nº1, pp. 90–113.doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.546255
  • Clark, Lynn Schofield, (2011): “Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory”, vol. 21, nº 4, pp. 323-U36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
  • Coleman, John C., Hendry, Leo B. (2003): Psicología de la adolescencia. Morata, Madrid.
  • Dowdell, Elizabeth. B., (2012): “Use of the Internet by parents of middle school students: Internet rules, risky behaviours and online concerns”, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, vol. 20, nº 1, pp. 9–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01815.x
  • Espinosa, Mª Ángeles y Ochaíta, Esperanza, (2002): “¿Quién es el niño?”, en Rivera, Mª José, Walzer, Alejandra y Gª Matilla, Agustín. (coord.), Libro interactivo Educación para la Comunicación, Televisión y Multimedia. Master de Televisión Educativa de la UCM y Corporación Multimedia, Madrid.
  • Frutos Torres, Belinda de y Vázquez Barrio, Tamara, (2012): “Adolescentes y jóvenes en el entorno digital: Análisis de su discurso sobre usos, percepción de riesgo y mecanismos de protección”, Doxa Comunicación, nº 15, pp. 57-79.
  • Fundación de ayuda contra la drogadicción, (2012): Indicadores Básicos de Juventud, FAD, Madrid.
  • Fundación Telefónica, (2014): La sociedad de la Información en España 2013, (consultado en http://www.fundacion.telefonica.com/es/arte_cultura/publicaciones/detalle/258#).
  • Gabelas Barroso, José Antonio y Marta Lazo, Carmen, (2008): “Modos de intervención de los padres en el conflicto que supone el consumo de pantallas”, Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, nº 63, pp. 109-125.
  • García Jiménez, Antonio (ed.) (2012): Comunicación, infancia y juventud. Situación e investigación en España, UOC, Barcelona.
  • Garmendia, Maialen, Garitaonandia, Carmelo, Martínez, Gemma, y Casado, Miguel Ángel, (2012): “The effectiveness of parental mediation”, en Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie y Görzig, Anke (eds.), Children, Risk and Safety Online: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 231-244.
  • Gentile, Douglas. A., Nathanson, Amy I., Rasmussen, Eric E., Reimer, Rachel A., & Walsh, David A., (2012): “Do you see what I see? Parent and child reports of parental monitoring of media”, Family Relations, vol. 61, nº 3, 2012, pp. 470-487. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00709.x
  • Hammersley, M. y Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice, London: Tavistock.
  • Hasebrink, Uwe, Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie y Olafsson, Kjartan, (2009) Comparing children´s online opportunities and risks across Europe, London School of Economics, London.
  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2014) “Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares” http://www.abc.es/tecnologia/redes/20141002/abci-usuarios-internet-ordenadores-201410021726.html
  • Kalmus, Veronika, Runnel, Pille, y Siibak, Andra, (2009): “Opportunities and benefits online”, en Livingstone, Sonia y Haddon, Leslie, Kids Online. Opportunities and risks for children, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp.71-82.
  • Kalmus, Veronika, Von Feilitzen, Cecilia y Siibak, Andra, (2012): “Effectiveness of teachers’ and peer’s mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online. En LIVINGSTONE, Sonia, HADDON Leslie, Görzig, Anke (eds.), Children, Risk and Safety Online: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 245-255.
  • Klinke, Andreas, & Renn, Ortwin, (2002): “A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1071-1094.
  • Lazo, Carmen Marta. (2005), “Los padres y madres, principal referente de lo que los niños ven en la pantalla” Comunicar, vol. 25, nº 2, 2005.
  • Lee, Sook-Jung, & Chae, Young-Gil, (2012): “Balancing participation and risks in children's internet use: The role of internet literacy and parental mediation”. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, vol. 15, nº 5, pp. 257-262. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0552
  • Livingstone, Sonia & Haddon, Leslie, (2008): “Risky Experiences for Children Online: Charting European Research on Children and the Internet”, Children & Society, vol. 22, nº 4, pp. 314–323. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00157.x
  • Livingstone, Sonia y Helsper, Ellen. J., (2008): “Parental mediation of children's internet use”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 52, nº 4, pp. 581-599.
  • Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie, Görzig, Anke, Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full findings 2011, London School of Economics, London, 2011.
  • Lwin, May O., Stanaland, Andrea J. S., & Miyazaki, Anthony D. (2008): “Protecting children's privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness” Journal of Retailing, vol. 84, nº 2, pp. 205-217. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004
  • Marciales Vivas, Gloria Patricia y Cabra Torres, Fabiola, (2011): “Internet and moral panic: A review of research about interaction of children and teenagers with new mass media”, Universitas Psychologica, vol. 10, nº 3, pp. 855-865
  • Martínez Pastor, Esther, García Jiménez, Antonio, Sendín Gutiérrez y José Carlos, (2013): “Percepció dels riscos a la xarxa per els adolescents a Espanya: usos problemàtics i formes de control”, Anàlisi Monogràfic, pp. 111-130.
  • Mascheroni, Giovanna y Ólafsson, Kjartan, (2013):Mobile internet access and use among European children. Initial findings of the Net Children Go Mobile project, (consultado en http://www.netchildrengomobile.eu/reports/).
  • Nikken, Peter, & de Graaf, Hanneke (2013): “Reciprocal relationships between friends’ and parental mediation of adolescents' media use and their sexual attitudes and behavior”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 42, nº 11, pp. 1696-707. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9873-5.
  • Orozco, Guillermo, (1996): Televisión y audiencias. Un enfoque cualitativo. Ediciones de la Torre, Madrid.
  • Pasquier, Dominique, Simoes, Jose Alberto y Kredens, Elodie, (2012): “Agents of mediation and sources of safety awareness: a comparative overview”, en Livingstone, Sonia, Haddon, Leslie y Görzig, Anke (eds.), Children, Risk and Safety Online: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective, The Policy Press, Bristol, pp. 219-229.
  • Pasquier, Dominique, (2008): “From parental control to peer pressure: cultural transmission and conformism”, en Livingstone, Sonia, Drotner, Kirsten (eds.), International handbook of children, media and culture, Sage Publications, London, pp. 448-60.
  • Ruiz San Román, José Antonio, Ortiz Sobrino, Miguel Ángel, Porto, Leticia, “Aportaciones de las universidades españolas a la investigación sobre menores y medios de comunicación”, Anàlisi Monográfico: Alfabetización mediática, 2013, pp. 49-64.
  • Sánchez-Navarro, Jordi, Aranda, Daniel, (2011): “Internet como fuente de información para la vida cotidiana de los jóvenes españoles”, El profesional de la información, vol. 20, nº 1, pp. 32-37.
  • Sureda Negre, Jaume, Comas Forgas, Rubén y Morey López, Mercè, (2010): “Menores y acceso a internet en el hogar: Las normas familiares”, Comunicar, nº 34, pp. 135-143.
  • Tabone, Sara, & Messina, Laura, (2010): “Personal uses of internet and perceptions of parental mediation: A research with children 10 and 11 years old”, Innovation and Creativity in Education, vol. 2, nº 2, pp. 2077-2082. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.284
  • Valcke, Martin, Bonte, Sarah, De Wever, Bran de, & Rots, Isabel, (2010): “Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children”, Computers & Education, vol. 55, nº 2, pp. 454-464. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet