Efectos de la fragmentación de hábitats y pérdida de conectividad ecológica dentro de la dinámica territorial

Références bibliographiques

• ALLEE, W.C. et al. (1949): Principles of animal ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia.
• ANDRÉN, H. (1995): “Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with differentes proportions of suitable habitat: a review”. Oikos 71: 355-366.
• ANDRÉN, H. y ANGELSTAM, P. (1988): “Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence”. Ecology 69: 544-547.
• ATAURI, J.A. y DE LUCIO, J.V. (2001): “The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in mediterranean landscapes”. Landscape Ecology 16: 147-159.
• BAKKER, J.D. y WILSON, S.D. (2004): “Using ecological restoration to constrain biological invasion”. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 1058-1064.
• BALDI, A. (1999): “Microclimate and vegetation edge effects in a reedbed in Hungary”. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 1697–1706.
• BARRETT, G.W., FORD, H.A. y RECHER, H.F. (1994): “Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape”. Pacific Conservation Biology 1, 245-256.
• BENDER, D.J., TISCHENDORF, L. y FAHRIG, L. (2003): “Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes”. Landscape Ecology 18: 17–39.
• BIERREGAARD, R.O. et al. (Eds.) (2001): Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press.
• BLONDEL, J. y ARONSON, J. (1999): Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
• BOWMAN, J., CAPPUCCINO, N. y FAHRIG, L. (2002): “Patch size and population density: the effect of immigration behaviour”. Conservation Ecology 6: 9.
• BROOK, B.W. (2003): “Conservation biology: minimum sizes and habitat areas for viable wildlife populations”. Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University. CER News 79: 11–13.
• BROWN J.H. y KODRIC-BROWN, A. (1977): “Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction”. Ecology 58: 445-449.
• BRUNA, E.M. y OLI, M.K. (2005): “Demographic effects of habitat fragmentation on a tropical herb: life-table response experiments”. Ecology 86: 1816-1824.
• BUREL, F. y BAUDRY, J. (2002): Ecología del Paisaje. Conceptos, métodos y aplicaciones. Ediciones Mundi-Prensa, Madrid.
• CHALFOUN, A.D., THOMPSON, F.R. y RATNASWAMY, M.F. (2002): “Nest predators and fragmentation: a review and meta-analysis”. Conservation Biology 16: 306-318.
• CONNOR, E. F., COURTNEY, A.C. y YODER, J.M. (2000): “Individuals-area relationships: the relationship between animal population density and area”. Ecology 81:734-748.
• CROOKS, K. y SANJAYAN, M. (Eds.) (2006): Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• DEBINSKI, D.M. y HOLT, R.D. (2000): “A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments: a global survey and overview”. Conservation Biology 14: 342-355.
• DEL BARRIO, G. et al. (2000): “Aproximación para estimar la conectividad regional de las redes de conservación”. En: V Congreso Nacional de Medio Ambente. Comunicaciones Técnicas. Colegio oficial de Físicos, Madrid: 1-17.
• DE LUCIO, J.V., ATAURI, J.A., SASTRE, P. y MARTÍNEZ, C. (2003): Conectividad y redes de espacios naturales protegidos: del modelo teórico a la visión práctica de la gestión. En García Mora, M.R. (coord.) “Conectividad ambiental: las áreas protegidas en la cuenca mediterránea”. Junta de Andalucía: 29-54.
• DESROCHERS, A., HANSKI, I.K. y SELONEN, V. (2003): “Siberian flying squirrel responses to high- and low-contrast forest edges”. Landscape Ecology 18: 543–552.
• DIAMOND, J. (1975): “The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of nature preserves”. Biological Conservation 7: 129-146.
• DÍAZ, J.A. et al. (2000): “Effects of forest fragmentation on the distribution of the lizard Psammodromus algirus”. Animal Conservation 3: 235-240.
• DÍAZ, J.A. et al. (2005): “Habitat fragmentation reduces reproductive investment and hatchling growth rate in Psammodromus algirus lizards”. Conservation Biology 19: 1578-1585.
• DÍAZ, M. et al. (1998): “Effects of pine plantations on bird communities of the Spanish plateaux: biogeography, landscape and vegetation effects”. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 562-574.
• DÍAZ PINEDA, F. (2001): “Intensification, rural abandonment and nature conservation in Spain”. En Bunce, R.G.H. et al. (eds.) Examples of European agri-environment schemes and livestock systems and their influence on Spanish cultural landscapes. Alterra, Wageningen: 23-38.
• DIDHAM R.K. y LAWTON, J.H. (1999): “Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation in tropical forest fragments”. Biotropica 31: 17-30.
• DONALD, P. F. (2004): “Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems”. Conservation Biology 18: 17–37.
• DOOLEY, L. y BOWERS, M.A. (1998): “Demographic responses to habitat fragmentation: Experimental tests at the landscape and patch scale”. Ecology 79: 969-980.
• FAGAN W.F., CANTRELL, R.S. y COSNER, C. (1999): “How habitat edges change species interactions”. The American Naturalist 153: 165-182.
• FAHRIG, L. (2003): “Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity”. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 487-515.
• FARINA, A. (1998): Principles and methods in landscape ecology. Chapman an Hall, London.
• GASCON, C. et al. (1999): “Matrix habitat and especies richness in tropical forest remants”. Biological Conservation 91: 223-229.
• GILPIN, M.E. Y SOULÉ, M.E. (1986): “Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction”. En: Soulé, M.E. (ed.) Conservation biology, the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts: 19-34.
• GONZÁLEZ BERNÁLDEZ F. (1981): Ecología y paisaje. Blume, Madrid.
• HANSKI, I.A. y GILPIN, M.E. (1997): Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.
• HANSKI, I. (1999): Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
• HARTLEY, M.J. y HUNTER, M.J. (1998): “A meta-analysis of forest cover, edge effects and artificial nest predation”. Conservation Biology 12: 465-469.
• HENLE, K. et al. (2004): “Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation”. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 207-251.
• HUGGETT, A.J. (2005): “The concept and utility of “ecological thresholds” in biodiversity conservation”. Biological Conservation 124: 301-310.
• JONGMAN, R.H.G. (2002): “Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 211-221.
• JULES, E.S. (1998): “Habitat fragmentation and demographic change for a common plant: Trillium in old-growth forest”. Ecology 79:1645-1656.
• LAURANCE, W.F. (1997): “Hyper-disturbed parks: edge effects and the ecology of iolated rainforest reserves in tropical Australia”. En: Laurance, W.F. y Bierregaard, R.O. (eds.) Tropical forest remnants. Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 71–83.
• LAURANCE, W.F. (1990): “Comparative responses of five arboreal marsupials to tropical forest fragmentation”. Journal of Mammalogy 71, 641-653.
• LAURANCE, W.L. y BIERREGAARD, R.O. (eds.). (1997): Tropical forest remnants. Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• LAW, B.S. y DICKMAN, C.R. (1998): “The use of habitat mosaics by terrestial vertebrate fauna: implications for conservation and management”. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 323-333.
• LENS, L. et al. (1999): “Fluctuating asymmetry increases with habitat disturbance in seven bird species of a fragmented afrotropical forest”. En Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 266: 1241-1246.
• LEVINS, R. (1970): “Extinction”. En: Gerstenhaber, M. (ed.) Some mathematical problems in biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence: 75-107.
• LINDENMAYER, D.B. y FRANKLIN, J.F. (2002): Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington.
• LOMOLINO, M.V. (2000): “Ecology´s most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship”. Journal of Biogeography 27: 17-26.
• LOMOLINO, M.V. y WEISER, M.D. (2001): “Towards a more general species-area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small”. Journal of Biogeography 28: 431-445.
• LOVEJOY T.E. et al. (1986): “Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments”. En Soulé, M.E. (ed.), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Mass: 257-325.
• LUCK, G.W. (2005): “An introduction to ecological thresholds”. Biological Conservation 124: 299-300.
• MACARTHUR, R.H. y WILSON, E.O. (1967): The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New-Yersey.
• MANDUJANO, A. y ESTRADA, A. (2005): “Umbrales de área y distancia de aislamiento y presencia de monos aulladores, Alouatta palliata, en fragmentos de selva en Los Tuxtlas, México. Universidad y Ciencia Nº Especial II: 11-21.
• MATLACK, G. y LITVAITIS, J. (1999): “Forest edges". En Hunter, M.L. (ed.) Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: 210-233.
• MERRIAM, G. (1984): “Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern”. En Brandt, J. y Agger, P. Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning. Roskilde Universitetsforlag GeoRuc, Roskilde, Dinamarca: 5-15.
• MÚGICA, M., et al. (2002): Integración territorial de espacios naturales protegidos y conectividad ecológica en paisajes mediterráneos. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla.
• MURCIA, C. (1995): “Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58–62.
• NAVEH, Z. (1994): “From biodiversity to ecodiversity: landscape ecology approach to conservation and restoration”. Restoration Ecology 2:180-189.
• NOSS, R.F. y CSUTI, B. (1994): “Habitat fragmentation”. En Meffe, G.K. y Carroll, C.R. (Eds.) Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinaur Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts: 237–264.
• ODUM, E.P. (1958): Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia.
• OPDAM, P. (1991): “Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of holarctic breeding bird studies”. Landscape Ecology 5: 93-106.
• PALIK, B.J. y MURPHY, P.G. (1990): “Disturbance versus edge effects in sugar-maple/beech forest fragments”. Forest Ecology and Management 32: 187-202.
• PINO, J. et al. (2000): “Landscape structure and bird species richness: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks”. Landscape and Urban Planning 9: 5-48.
• PRESTON, F.W. (1962): “The canonigal distribution of commonness and rarity: Part I”. Ecology 43: 185-215.
• PRIMACK, R. (2002): Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
• PULLIAM, H.R. (1988): “Sources, sinks and population regulation”. The American Naturalist 132: 652-661.
• RADFORD, J.Q., BENNETT, A.F. y CHEERS, G.J. (2005): “Landscape level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland dependent birds”. Biological Conservation 124: 317-337.
• RIVARD, D.H. et al. (2000): “Species richness and changes in species composition in Canada's national parks: With-in park habitat and the regional context”. Conservation Biology 14: 1099-1110.
• ROSENZWEIG, M.L. (1995). Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• SANTOS, T. y TELLERÍA, J.L. (1998): “Efectos de la fragmentación de los bosques sobre los vertebrados en las mesetas ibéricas”. Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid.
• SANTOS, T. y TELLERÍA, J.L. (2006): “Pérdida y fragmentación del hábitat: efecto sobre la conservación de las especies”. Ecosistemas 2: 3-12.
• SCHIEGG, K. (2000): “Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity”. Ecoscience 7: 290-298.
• SCHTICKZELLE, N. y BAGUETTE, M. (2003): “Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration–patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes”. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 533–545.
• SCHULTZ, C.B. y CRONE, E.E. (2005): “Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration”. Conservation Biology 19: 887-896.
• SHAFFER, M.L. (1981): “Minimum population sizes for species conservation”. BioScience 31: 131-134.
• SHAFFER, M.L. (1987): “Minimum viable population: coping with uncertainty”. En: Soulé, M. (Ed.) Viable Population for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• SIMBERLOFF, D. (1982): “Big advantages of small refuges”. Natural History 91: 6-14.
• SIMBERLOFF, D.S. y L.G. ABELE. (1976): “Island biogeography theory and conservation practice”. Science 191: 285-286.
• STEPHENS, S.E. et al. (2003): “Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales”. Biological Conservation 115: 101-110.
• SUAREZ-SEOANE S., OSBORNE P.E y BAUDRY J. (2002): “Responses of birds of different biogeographic origins and habitats to agricultural land abandonment in northern Spain”. Biological Conservation 105: 333-344.
• TAYLOR P.D. et al. 1993. “Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure”. Oikos 68: 571- 573.
• TELLERÍA, J.L. y SANTOS, T. (1999): “Distribution of birds in fragments of Mediterranean forest: the role of ecological densities”. Ecography 22. 13-19.
• TELLERÍA, J.L. (2001): “Gestión forestal y conservación de la fauna de vertebrados”. En Camprodon, J. y Plana, E. (Eds.) Conservación de la biodiversidad y gestión forestal. Su aplicación en la fauna vertebrada. Edicions Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona: 119-133.
• TISCHENDORF, L. et al. (2005): “Mechanisms affecting population density in fragmented habitat”. Ecology and Society 10: 7.
• TOMS, J.D. y LESPERANCE, M.L. (2003): “Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds”. Ecology 84: 2034-2041.
• TUCKER, G.M. (1997): “Priorities for bird conservation in Europe: the importance of the farmed landscape”. In: Pain, D.J. y Pienkowski, M.W. (Eds.) Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation. Academic Press, London: 79–116.
• TURNER, M.G. y GARDNER, R.H. (Eds.). (1991): Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
• WIENS, J.A., CRAWFORD, C.S. y GOSZ, J.R. (1985): “Boundaruy dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying lanscape ecosystems”. Oikos 45: 421-427.
• WILCOVE, D.S. (1985): “Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds”. Ecology 66: 1211-1214.
• WILLIAMS, C.B. (1964): Patterns in the balance of nature and related problems in quantitative biology. New York Academy Press, New York.
• WILLSON, M.F. et al. (2001): “Patterns of predation risk and survival of bird nests in a chilean agricultural landscape”. Conservation Biology 15, 447-456.
• WHITTAKER, R. (1998): Island biogeography. Ecology, evolution and conservation. Oxford University Press.
• WITH, K.A. et al. (2002): “Threshold effects of landscape structure on biological control in agroecosystems”. Ecological Applications 12: 52-65.
• WITH, K.A. y CRIST, T.O. (1995): “Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure”. Ecology 76: 2446–2459.
• WITH, K.A. y KING, A. W. (1999): “Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds”. Landscape Ecology 14: 73-82.
• WOLF, M. y BATZLI, G. O. (2002): “Effects of forest edge on populations of white-footed mice Peromyscus leucopus”. Ecography 25: 193-199.