Valoración de la contribución zonal a la conectividad de la red Natura 2000 en el País Vasco

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Antúnez, A. y Márquez, A.L. (1992): “Las escalas en Biogeografía”, en Vargas, J.M., Real, R. y Antúnez, A. (Eds.): Objetivos y métodos biogeográficos. Aplicaciones en Herpetología. Valencia, Asociación Herpetológica Española, pp. 31-38.
• Bennett, A. (1999): Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
• Bennett, A.F., Crooks, K.R. y Sanjayan, M. (2006): “The future of connectivity conservation”, en Crooks, K.R. and Sanjayan, M. (Eds): Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Bennett, G. y Mulongoy, K.J. (2006): Review of experience with ecological networks, corridors and buffer zones. Montreal, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Technical Series, 23.
• Broquet, T. et al. (2006): “Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana)”, Landscape Ecology, 21, pp. 877-889.
• Bruinderink, G.G. et al. (2003): “Designing a coherent ecological network for large mammals in northwestern Europe”, Conservation Biology, 17, pp. 549-557.
• Chardon, J.P., Adriaensen, F. y Matthysen, E. (2003): “Incorporating landscape elementes into a connectivity measure: a case study for the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.)”. Landscape Ecology, 18, pp. 561-573.
• De Terán, M. y Solé, L. (1968, Dir.): Geografía Regional de España. Barcelona, Ariel.
• Del Barrio, G. et al. (2000): “Aproximación para estimar la conectividad regional de las redes de conservación”, en V Congreso Nacional de Medio Ambiente. Comunicaciones Técnicas. Madrid, Colegio oficial de Físicos, Madrid, pp. 1-17.
• Del Barrio, G. et al. (2006): “Integrating multiple modelling approaches to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species’ distributions in contrasting regions: comparison and implications for policy”, Environmental Science & Policy, 9, pp. 129-147.
• Eastman, J.R. (2003): IDRISI Kilimanjaro. Guide to GIS and image processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worcester.
• Gustafson, E.J. y Gardner, R.H. (1996): “The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization”, Ecology, 77, pp. 94-107.
• Gurrutxaga, M. (2007): La conectividad de redes de conservación en la planificación territorial con base ecológica. Fundamentos y aplicaciones en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao.
• Isaaks, E.H. y Srivastava, R.M. (1989): An introduction to applied geostatistcs. Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
• Jedrzejewski, W. et al. (2005): Project of ecological corridors linking Natura 2000 sites in Poland. Mammals Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, Bialowieza.
• Jongman, R.H.G, Bouwma, I.M. y Van Doorn, A. (2006): Indicative map of the Pan-European Ecological Network in Western Europe. Alterra, Wageningen, European Centre for Nature Conservation. Alterra-rapport 1429.
• Jepsen, J.U. et al. (2005): “Evaluating the effect of corridors and landscape heterogeneity on dispersal probability: a comparison of three spatially explicit modelling approaches”, Ecological Modelling, 181, pp. 445-459.
• Klinkenberg, B. y Goodchild, M. (1992): “The fractal properties of topography: a comparison of methods”, Earth Processes and Landforms, 17, pp. 217-234.
• Kupfer, J.A., Malanson, G.P. y Franklin, S.B. (2006): “Not seeing the ocean for the islands: The influence of matrix-based processes on forest fragmentation effects”, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, pp. 8-20.
• Múgica, M. et al. (2002): Integración territorial de espacios naturales protegidos y conectividad ecológica en paisajes mediterráneos. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla.
• Palomo, L.J. y Gisbert, J. (2002): Atlas de los mamíferos terrestres de España. Madrid, Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU.
• Primack, R.B. (2006): Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. 4th Edition.
• Rothley, K. (2005): “Finding and filling the cracks in resistance surfaces for least-cost modelling”, Ecology and Society, 10, 4.
• Taylor, P.D. et al. (1993): “Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure”, Oikos, 68, pp. 571- 573.
• Theobald, D.M. (2005): “A note on creating robust resistance surfaces for computing functional landscape connectivity”, Ecology and Society, 10, 2. Disponible en: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/resp1/
• Verbeylen, G. et al. (2003). “Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape?”, Landscape Ecology, 18, pp. 791-805.
• Xu, T., Moore, I.D. y Gallant, J.C. (1993): “Fractals, fractal dimensions and landscapes a review”, Geomorphology, 8, pp. 245-262.