Concepts of the 'Scientific Revolution'. An analysis of the historiographical appraisal of the traditional claims of science

  1. Nnaji, John Onyekachi
Dirigée par:
  1. José Luis Luján López Directeur/trice

Université de défendre: Universitat de les Illes Balears

Fecha de defensa: 12 juin 2013

Jury:
  1. José Antonio López Cerezo President
  2. Jens Oliver Todt Secrétaire
  3. Marta Isabel González García Rapporteur
  4. Juan Bautista Bengoetxea Cousillas Rapporteur
  5. Francisco Javier Rodríguez Alcázar Rapporteur

Type: Thèses

Résumé

´Scientific revolution´, as a concept, is both ´philosophically general´ and ´historically unique´. Both dual-sense of the term alludes to the occurrence of great changes in science. The former defines the changes in science as a continual process while the latter designate them, particularly, as the ´upheaval´ which took place during the early modern period. This research aims to demonstrate how the historicists´ critique of the justification of the traditional claims of science on the basis of the scientific processes and norms of the 16th and 17th centuries, illustrates the historical/local determinacy of the science claims. It argues that their identification of the contextual and historical character of scientific processes warrants a reconsideration of our notion of the universality of science. It affirms that the universality of science has to be sought in the role of such sources like scientific instruments, practical training and the acquisition of methodological routines.